Every week on Future Tense, we highlight a talk from a leading thinker from Drone U speaking on the topic of what our drone future may look like. Drone U is produced in cooperation with the New America Foundation. (Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State University.)
This week, Drone U features a podcast from Mickey Osterreicher, general counsel for the National Press Photographers Association. Osterreicher examines whether there is a First Amendment “right to drone” and the use of drones for news gathering.
Osterreicher notes that currently the FAA prohibits the operation of drones by news organizations because it is considered “commercial use,” which won’t be allowed except under special circumstances until late 2015 at the earliest. Even public universities that are simply training students on how to use drones as news gathering tools face FAA restrictions.
In looking at privacy issues on behalf of the National Press Photographers Association, Osterreicher has been a strong advocate of the right to photograph and record in public. However, Osterreicher notes that these First Amendment rights are subject to time, place, and manner restrictions. When the regulations do open up to allow use of drones by news organizations, he expects to see the courts weigh competing interests between the rights of the press to operate these systems and public safety concerns.
Join us on Nov. 13 for the next episode from Drone U.
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter
The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge
The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems
Giving Up on Goodell
How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.