Every Wednesday on Future Tense, we will highlight a talk from a leading thinker from Drone U speaking on the topic of what our drone future may look like. Drone U is produced in cooperation with the New America Foundation. (Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State University.)
This week, Drone U features Amie Stepanovich, director of the Domestic Surveillance Project at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. In this episode, Stepanovich discusses the privacy implications of domestic drone use, and suggests legal measures to ensure that individual rights are not eroded as drones are integrated into domestic airspace.
Stepanovich perfectly articulates a tension I frequently hear in conversations about our drone future. On one hand, there is a sense of amazement at what drone technology will provide us: monitoring of environmental abuse, enhanced search and rescue functions, new tools for investigative journalism, speedy taco delivery. But at the same time, many—including myself—have serious qualms that drones can all too easily be co-opted for unsavory purposes. Part of this anxiety is that, just as with any technology, it’s impossible to predict exactly what novel uses the future will conjure up. There are already a few unforeseen uses, as Stepanovich explains, including potential drone-enabled peeping toms and what sounds like a drone lending library maintained by Customs and Border Protection.
What we do know is that drones are excellent platforms for existing surveillance technologies. Stepanovich names facial recognition tools, thermal imaging cameras, automated license plate readers, and stingray receptors (devices used to locate and communications from cellphones and other wireless devices) as just a few examples. This is a sobering reminder that much of our existing privacy protection has been wrapped up in technological limitations, not enshrined in legal protection. Those technological limitations are evaporating—and drones are playing a part.
How do we prevent a future where around-the-clock visual surveillance is commonplace, but protect a future full of useful, airborne innovation? Stepanovich focuses on the former by contributing thoughtful recommendations on the best ways to provide the proper level of civil liberties protection. In doing so, she kicks off a conversation on privacy and innovation that I am certain we will continue to have over at Drone U.
Join us on July 31 for the next episode from Drone U, featuring Michael Toscano, president and CEO of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International.
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.