Can You Be an Environmentalist Without Embracing Nuclear Energy?
Thirty-nine years after the meltdown at Three Mile Island and almost five years post-Fukushima, nuclear power seems to be emerging from its long funk as a promising alternative to the carbon economy. Innovative new designs are changing the landscape of nuclear power and have the potential to redefine affordable, emission-free, and carbon-free clean energy. So why is it still a hotly contested issue?
Will proliferation of nuclear energy be among the solutions the world seeks, or will our long memory of the fallout from first and second generation reactors prevent us from embracing the promise of clean energy that new models provide?
Join Future Tense on Monday, Feb. 22, at 12:15 p.m., for lunch and conversation in Washington, D.C., to consider whether you can truly be an environmentalist without embracing nuclear energy. For more information and to RSVP, visit the New America website.
Participants:
Steve LeVine
Washington correspondent, Quartz
Future Tense fellow, New America
Adjunct professor, Center for Security Studies, Georgetown University
Aaron VanDevender
Chief scientist and principal, Founders Fund
Jennifer Richter
Assistant professor, School for the Future of Innovation in Society and School of Social Transformation, Arizona State University
Robert Hill
Technical director, Nuclear Energy R&D, Argonne National Laboratory
Joseph Romm
Founding editor, ClimateProgress.org
Senior fellow, Center for American Progress
Author, Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know
Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University.