Facebook's for middle-aged narcissists, Twitter for young ones.

Facebook's for Middle-Aged Narcissists, Twitter for Young Ones

Facebook's for Middle-Aged Narcissists, Twitter for Young Ones

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Sept. 24 2013 1:47 PM

Facebook's for Middle-Aged Narcissists, Twitter for Young Ones


Mark Zuckerberg, enabler of middle-aged narcissists worldwide.
Mark Zuckerberg, enabler of middle-aged narcissists worldwide.

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

This item was originally published on the Conversation.

An increasing number of studies into the correlation between social media and narcissistic tendencies confirm what many of us already suspect. We see teenagers spending hour after hour with their phones looking at Facebook, consumed with how they present themselves online and how others respond to their profiles. We read about self-obsessed celebrities promoting themselves on Twitter, even when they appear to be in the midst of a nervous breakdown. Narcissism on social media runs across the spectrum of users.


But it is interesting how the correlation varies between different sites. In a study we conducted on users of Facebook and Twitter, published in Computers in Human Behaviour, we wanted to understand how social media reflected or amplified narcissism. We measured this by asking questions about usage and personality assessments that revealed different narcissistic traits such as exhibitionism, superiority, and authority.

We found some young adult university students who had scored higher in certain types of narcissism posted more often on Twitter. But those with narcissistic tendencies in middle-aged adults from the general population tended to post more frequently on Facebook. We concluded that those in middle age had usually already formed their social selves and used Facebook to gain approval from their peers whereas narcissistic university students used Twitter to broadcast views to broader social circles.

Share and share a “like”
Studies also suggest a link between the amount of time spent on Facebook and the likelihood of showing narcissistic traits, in particular exhibitionism. However, the frequency with which users post status updates is a better predictor and so a less simplistic measure. We can also begin to dig deeper—if posting frequency is linked to narcissistic traits then it’s important to determine whether this applies to any kind of posting (like linking to a news story) or only postings related to one’s own thoughts, feelings, and accomplishments.

Future research would also determine whether narcissists differ from others in their expectations of how others respond to their posts. For those who receive many comments or “likes” on a picture or status update, frequent posting can be a means of conversation. If you’re a narcissist, how does it affect you if you post but don’t receive any feedback?


Research recently carried out at Penn State University also suggests that how we behave in social media reflects our levels of self-esteem. Participants were asked questioned about the types of personal data they included on their profiles, how often they changed and updated information, and how they saw their self-worth. From this the researchers suggest that users with lower self-esteem continuously monitor their walls and delete unwanted posts from other users. From a practical perspective, the researchers suggest that app developers could develop ways of customizing walls and profile pages to tap into these concerns.

Measure for measure
Social media use has developed over the years. So there is a risk in this type of research of producing fragmentary evidence that doesn’t add up to anything meaningful. And the more specific a measure is (measuring Facebook “pokes,” for instance), the more likely the practice that is being measured is to fall out of use, leading research to become inscrutable to future readers. (What, exactly, did it mean to “poke” someone?)

Instead we need to consider the bigger picture by analyzing attributes and behaviors that stick around long after the latest iteration of the most popular social media site has vanished. No one may be poking or tweeting 10 years from now, but it’s a relatively safe bet that people will post information about themselves and their accomplishments with varying frequency and with various expectations about their audiences.

Moral panic
Some have responded to critiques of social media by likening it to the overblown “moral panics” over the effect of comic books and television on children. A common defense of social media (and media generally) is that its use is merely an extension of existing behavior. Teenagers of yesteryear congregated in parking lots; today, they congregate online.


This outlook is productive because it helps us to avoid an irrational bias in favor of face-to-face interaction and against all things digital. However, it fails to acknowledge how certain attributes of online life—immediate gratification, the expanded audience—may fundamentally change how we interact and develop as human beings. Keeping on eye on the relationships between social media use and psychological traits such as narcissism helps us know whether certain kinds of online socializing strengthen our social fabric while other kinds divide us further.

More than 1 billion people now have Facebook accounts, and we know that social media use is associated with desirable things such as increasing social support. It also appears to help those who are shy form meaningful relationships. But we have to understand the good and the bad.

The Conversation

Research findings on narcissism and social media use should help us fill in some of the missing pieces about how we are developing relationships and interacting in a digital age. We still don’t know whether social media itself causes increases in narcissism, if narcissists merely seek out social media, or if both form a kind of vicious cycle. The rapid, widespread adoption of any technology is oft met with the dual responses of fear and claims of exaggeration. Understanding the limitations of findings—and the benefits—is the best way to separate knowledge from controversy.

Future Tense is a partnership of Arizona State University, the New America Foundation, and Slate.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.