Oregon Ducks chant “no means no”: Players and commentators shame Jameis Winston after FSU’s Rose Bowl loss.

FSU's Rose Bowl Loss Was Not a Victory for Rape Victims

FSU's Rose Bowl Loss Was Not a Victory for Rape Victims

The XX Factor
What Women Really Think
Jan. 2 2015 11:33 AM

FSU's Rose Bowl Loss Was Not a Victory for Rape Victims

455874644-jameis-winston-of-the-florida-state-seminoles-on-the
TALLAHASSEE, FL - SEPTEMBER 20: Jameis Winston #5 of the Florida State Seminoles on the field during pregame against the Clemson Tigers at Doak Campbell Stadium on September 20, 2014 in Tallahassee, Florida. (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

The Oregon Ducks trounced the Florida State Seminoles in Thursday night’s Rose Bowl, sending Oregon to the first-ever College Football Playoff national championship, and marking the (likely) end to Jameis Winston's college football career in the most embarrassing way possible. Fans of Oregon football delighted in the team’s win, but critics of FSU quarterback Winston—the guy who finally evaded a rape charge after years of dawdling by Tallahassee and university investigators—reveled in the moral victory suggested by Winston’s loss.

USA Today’s Christine Brennan ripped Winston’s performance in the game but admitted in a tweet that her words were fueled by “2-years worth of pent-up karma” originating from Winston’s actions off the field. Rolling Stone’s Janet Reitman deemed the game the “Best Rose Bowl ever,” tweeting that “Oregon is doing to ‘alleged’ rapist Jameis Winston what [Florida authorities] refused to do.” (Reitman later deleted the tweet.) After the game, Ducks players joined in the sexual assault awareness gloating, chanting “No Means No” to the tune of the Seminoles’ (racist) “tomahawk chop.” Oregon coach Mark Helfrich says that the players who participated in the post-game chant will be disciplined.  

Advertisement

As Jezebel notes, some “Ducks defenders argued that the players were just loudly, vigorously stating their support for sexual consent.” As one critic put it: “Oregon players will be disciplined for supporting women.” Nah. The Oregon players are being disciplined for banal reasons that have nothing to do with the content of the chant. There’s no rape exemption to good sportsmanship guidelines. In this case, “The University of Oregon expects our student-athletes to always maintain an attitude of respect toward our opponents.” Even if that opponent is Jameis Winston.

This was, in the end, just a game. Football encourages emotional investment from its fans and bequeaths role model status to its players, but it's a step too far to grant the sport some moral authority when it comes to sexual assault. That's how Winston got off so easy in the first place.