I agree with you that there could be this worry that you’re letting this person get a view of your life and this person is not part of your life anymore, in your family anymore. But you decide who you want to let into your circle based on relationships, right? So if the divorce in the real world has changed the relationship, if you feel this person should not belong in your family, if you don’t like her, then you decide to close her out of the loop. But if you’re friends with her, I think it’s fine. I think if there’s no problems with the brother, it should continue.
Emily: I dislike people saying, “Okay, you have to take sides now,” unless it’s some truly grotesque violation. If it’s the normal “it didn’t work out,” let other people decide on their own relationships with your ex.
I wanted to ask, is there a special Facebook corral for former in-laws who I don’t want to be rude enough to un-friend but I want to put in a special thing where they don’t know where we’re all going for Thanksgiving? Can you do that?
Farhad: Yeah, you can do that. It takes some work. You have to put them in a special list and make sure you don’t post stuff that goes out to that list of people, but it’s possible. I don’t know if all Facebook users can navigate the site well enough to accomplish that, but it’s possible.
Emily: Okay, Mark Zuckerberg, we need a special ex-in-law button.
Farhad: I think that over time people will use that function more. I hope they make it even easier. I think that’s really what our real life relationships are. We don’t all have one level of acquaintance called “friend” or “not friend.” We have close friends; we have family; we have work friends; we have college friends. For each of those different kinds of groups, we want to send out a different image of ourselves and a different level of access. I think that’s where Facebook and Google+ and others are going. I hope that becomes easier over time.
Emily: I agree with the point you made that this now former sister-in-law may also be feeling, “Oh, geez, the last thing I want is this stream of information about this family that I’m just not part of anymore.” She may be debating if it’s rude for her, to quote Mitt Romney, and “self-deport” herself off the page of in-laws who are now ex in-laws.
Farhad: The thing that people should know about un-friending is you don’t get a notice when someone un-friends you on Facebook. It’s a pretty subtle thing. You have to look and see when you’ve been un-friended. If you feel like you just don’t want to be friends with someone, even because of that, because you’ve left the family, I think that’s fine to do.
Emily: We agree. There’s no protocol for casting out the former in-law. It really depends on your relationship. If you have your own relationship, your own friendship, no you don’t have to wipe this person off your Facebook page.
On the other hand, if things are such a nature that you realize “I like to cull my friends and take people out who I don’t have relationships anymore,” that’s something people are entitled to do.
Farhad: I think Facebook should mirror your real-life relationships.
Emily: Send us your questions about shifting etiquette in the online age. Our address is firstname.lastname@example.org
Farhad: You can also join our Facebook page where we carry on the conversation throughout the week. Go to www.Facebook.com/digitalmanners.
Emily: And we’ll talk to you next time on Manners for the Digital Age.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Ebola Story
How our minds build narratives out of disaster.
The Budget Disaster That Completely Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola
PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer
The Shooting Tragedies That Forged Canada’s Gun Politics
A Highly Unscientific Ranking of Crazy-Old German Beers
Welcome to 13th Grade!
Some high schools are offering a fifth year. That’s a great idea.
The Actual World
“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.