Wage Against the MachineIf Costco's worker generosity is so great, why doesn't Wal-Mart imitate it?
By Liza FeatherstonePosted Friday, June 27, 2008, at 7:29 AM ET

Nearly everyone who's looked at Wal-Mart's practices as an employer—its union busting, sex discrimination, low wages, and minimal benefits—has concluded that it's America's retail bad guy. By contrast, many who've examined the practices of Wal-Mart's competitor Costco—including New York Times labor reporter Steven Greenhouse in his recent book The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for the American Worker—conclude that it's the good guy. Costco CEO and founder Jim Sinegal repeatedly insists to Greenhouse that treating employees well is "good business."
That makes a pleasing sound bite, and assume for a moment that Sinegal's assertion is true. Why, then, wouldn't Wal-Mart do everything it could to make itself more like Costco? Now assume that Sinegal's assertion is false. Why, then, does Costco treat employees better if that's against the company's financial interests?
It's not hard to make a case that Costco pays employees more. The most relevant comparison is between Costco and Sam's Club, Wal-Mart's membership warehouse, since both business models rely on membership fees for a large percentage of revenues. A Sam's Club employee starts at $10 and makes $12.50 after four and a half years. A new Costco employee, at $11 an hour, doesn't start out much better, but after four and a half years she makes $19.50 an hour. In addition to this, she receives something called an "extra check"—a bonus of more than $2,000 every six months. A cashier at Costco, after five years, makes about $40,000 a year. Health benefits are among the best in the industry, with workers paying only about 12 percent of their premiums out-of-pocket while Wal-Mart workers pay more than 40 percent.
Some proponents of corporate generosity argue that better-paid workers are more productive. That may be the case here, since Costco's revenues per employee are about five times as high as Wal-Mart's. (No separate financials are available for Sam's Club.) Then again, it's also the case that Costco sells more expensive stuff—high-end French wine, triple-cream brie, and Cartier watches, all of which presumably have high margins—along with the cheap toilet tissue. Take a look at the two retailers' summer offerings: While Wal-Mart sells a $199 swing set, at Costco we find a "summer fortress play system" for $1,499.99. A set of patio furniture at Wal-Mart was $199 in early summer; a patio heater at Costco is the same price. Costco's Web site promotes a $5,000 hot tub with a stereo. On Wal-Mart's site last week, the most prominent item was a $48 bike—after all, its impoverished customers can't afford gas these days.
Another theoretical benefit is that Costco employees, being better paid, are less likely to leave the company. Again, some data back that up: Greenhouse points to Costco's low turnover rate, which is 20 percent and, among employees who stay at least a year, 6 percent. Wal-Mart's is about 50 percent. But is this a business advantage for Costco? While Greenhouse points to the costs of training and hiring new employees, a widely leaked 2005 memo from Wal-Mart offers a different perspective. In it, Wal-Mart's senior vice president of benefits argued that the company's turnover rate was too low. After all, she explains, long-term employees are more expensive and not necessarily any more productive. Such reasoning—though sinister—may actually help explain why Wal-Mart's profit margins are twice as high as Costco's (3.36 percent compared with 1.75 percent).
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
moneybox
columns
- The Eco-Friendliest Product You Can Buy
How my new pool cover is saving the planet.
Daniel Gross
posted Sept. 5, 2008 - The Bad News About Falling Oil Prices
If commodity prices are dropping, how come inflation might be getting worse?
Daniel Gross
posted Sept. 3, 2008 - The Death of the Credit Card Economy
Car leases, student loans, no-money-down mortgages, and high credit limits are vanishing.
Daniel Gross
posted Aug. 30, 2008 - Sorry, Pal, but You're Rich
The deluded business pundits and Obama critics who think $250,000 is a middle-class salary.
Daniel Gross
posted Aug. 27, 2008 - The Gold Medal in Medal-Predicting Goes To ...
Did economists correctly predict who'd win in the Beijing Olympics?
Daniel Gross
posted Aug. 25, 2008 - Search for more moneybox articles
- Subscribe to the moneybox RSS feed
- View our complete moneybox archive
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Accident Reconstructionist A Hit At Family Reunion
Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:00:25 -0400 - [video] Pre-Game Coin Toss Makes Jacksonville Jaguars Realize Randomness Of Life
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:08:09 -0400 - [audio] Astronomer Discovers Black Hole At Center Of Own Marriage
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:00:14 -0400 - » More from the Onion
In Palin's DefenseTelnaes Animation | John McCain makes a case for his running mate's foreign policy expertise.
Editorial: Sarah vs. Big Oil
- Mallaby: McCain Caves to Conservative Fanatics
- David Kay: Discussing Iran's Nuclear Future
- Diehl: Georgia's Troublemaker-in-Chief
- Andrew Cherlin: The American Family '08 | Q&A
- Today's Headlines
- Sarah Palin: An Apostle of Alaska
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:12:32 GMT - Rethinking the War on Cancer
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:55:51 GMT - The Taliban's No. 2 cash source: ransom kidnapping
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:01:39 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Kumbaya?
Fri, 5 September 2008 17:43:58 GMT - More Physicists, Fewer Fullbacks
Fri, 5 September 2008 19:14:17 GMT - Food Coloring
Fri, 5 September 2008 20:06:00 GMT - » More from The Root

moneybox









