HOME / the horse race: Pundits analyze the elections; we analyze the pundits.

The Horse Race charts the presidential election campaign using three measures: 1) the opinion polls (we use primarily the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll); 2) the Iowa Electronic Markets; 3) our own index of pundit opinion. (Movements in the Pundits' Index are justified and analyzed below.)

The Iowa Electronic Markets are a project of the University of Iowa College of Business administration. They are real markets, with real money at stake. We follow two. Both trade in shares that pay out after the election. The Winner Take All market will pay $1 for each share in the winner. (Thus WTA share prices reflect the market's judgment, at any moment, of the chance of a candidate winning.) The Vote Share market will pay each share a fraction of a dollar equaling that candidate's fraction of the popular vote. (Thus VS share prices reflect the market's judgment of the likely popular vote.)

The Iowa folks' thesis is that markets are better prognosticators than opinion polls or pundits. You be the judge. For more information, or to invest, visit the Iowa Electronic Markets site.

Starting soon, "The Horse Race" will also include the race for control of Congress.

NOTE: Because of the details of how these markets work, the prices on Clinton and Dole don't add up to $1. Because the opinion polls allow for "undecided," poll numbers and the Iowa VS prices are not directly comparable.

IEM Vote-Share Market vs. NBC/WSJ Poll

Winner Take All vs. Pundit Index

Iowa Electronic Market, 6/27/96
Vote Share Winner-Takes-All
Dole Clinton Dole Clinton
Open 43.5% 50.1% 40.3% 56.2%
Close 43.5% 50.9% 39.2% 56.8%
Pundits' Index
Clinton: 67%, down seven points from last week
Dole: 33%, up seven points from last week


The White House has managed finally to alarm even the jaded Washington press corps, to whom shady business deals (Whitewater) are boring but invasions of privacy (Filegate) are outrageous. The upshot is a record shock to the Clinton bull market.

Just as undaunted investment in mutual funds has suppressed Wall Street analysts' suspicions that financial stocks are overvalued, undaunted support for Clinton in the polls had suppressed, for more than a month, the pundits' sense that Clinton's political stock was due for a sharp correction. Filegate has now spooked the market out of its complacency, with a few trusty bulls holding firm (Jeffrey Birnbaum waved it off as "fileflap") but most (e.g. Nina Totenberg, Mara Liasson, Eleanor Clift) scaling back their exposure on calculations of a "serious" scandal and a "horrendous" week. Trading volume hit a new high as Filegate and Whitewater engulfed the weekend chat and quiz shows.

Filegate: The bears, spearheaded by Gerald Seib's Wednesday back-pager in the Wall Street Journal , gave four reasons why Filegate will hurt worse than Whitewater: It's freshly discovered; it happened in the current White House, not years ago in Arkansas; it's easy to explain; and Congress will hold hearings on it throughout the fall. Herd metaphor of the week: Watergate.

Whitewater: Embarrassed by their new riches of scandal material, most right-leaners gave the old stuff a rest. Kate O'Beirne conceded voters are "bored to tears" with Whitewater. Left-leaners wished it away on political grounds; Mark Shields said voters were "giving a verdict of 'not interested.'"

Dole: Who? Even right-leaners refused to liquidate more of their shares in Clinton until the other candidate proved himself worth buying. As Jack Germond put it: "People have not made a connection between their distrust of the Administration" and voting for Dole "because the Dole campaign is so out of it." Right-leaners fret that Filegate might sucker Dole into thinking he could win without presenting a positive vision. Meanwhile, neutrals began snoring at Dole's running-mate prospects without Powell (Cokie Roberts: "This is not a list that is going to wake up America").

Has the bottom fallen out of the Clinton market? Not quite. Scandal fatigue persists, and the pundits seem unwilling to panic until they see movement in public opinion. As Evan Thomas put it, to chuckles of agreement from the Inside Washington panel: "The polls show, one, the public thinks the worst about the White House, doesn't believe 'em, thinks they're all a bunch of lying crooks--and two, they're still gonna vote for Clinton anyway." Shields joked: "Two more bad weeks like this, and he'll have a 40-point lead."

Looking ahead: The Yeltsin-Lebed alliance has dissolved fears that Russia's upcoming presidential runoff might restore the Communists and hurt Clinton. Next on the crisis radar is ValuJet. The quiz and chat shows are already simmering with talk of an FAA scandal and the beheading of Transportation Secretary Federico Pea, though the pundits doubt that an anti-regulation GOP can score points over lax federal supervision. And the titillation has commenced over Hillary's "seances" with Gandhi and Eleanor Roosevelt.

--William Saletan

William Saletan is a Washington, D.C., political writer. He co-founded and edited The Hotline, a daily digest of political news, and is the author of a book on the politics of abortion, forthcoming from the University of California Press.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
William Saletan is Slate's national correspondent and author of Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War. Follow him on Twitter here.
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Summer in December.36/091207_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on unemployment.13/091207_TC.jpg
Use the steering wheel.86/091207_TD.jpg