My quick profile of Rep. Trey Gowdy, who'll run the Benghazi select committee, is right over here. It reads pretty positive, and that's because the people who knew Gowdy—even two who were primaried by him on his rise to power—think the guy's basically Atticus Finch. It's really no accident that Democrats have struggled, so far, to portray Gowdy as a hack who's doing this to raise money, and have had to rely on stories of other Republicans doing so and of Gowdy mentioning Benghazi at a fundraiser for someone else.
The better knock on Gowdy (hey, it's in my piece) is that he is demanding answers to questions that have, in some form, been asked. "Why was security lacking"? That's been dealt with in several internal reports.
This is why Gowdy, and less adroit allies, emphasize that the Benghazi investigation has been confusing. It's been divided between several committees, one of them (Select Committee on Intelligence) unable to share everything it got, all of them too hard to follow.
"The White House took advantage of the fact that there were so many committees," Rep. Raul Labrador said today. "They were lying or not giving full briefings on the subject."
TODAY IN SLATE
Meet the New Bosses
How the Republicans would run the Senate.
The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers
Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.
Cheez-Its. Ritz. Triscuits.
Why all cracker names sound alike.
Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom
This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059
- Protesters Take to the Streets to Sound Alarm on Climate Change in New York, Across the World
- Knife-Carrying White House Jumper is Vet who Feared “Atmosphere Was Collapsing”
- North Korea: American Sentenced to Hard Labor Wanted to Become “Second Snowden”
- Almost One in Four Americans Support Idea of Splitting From the Union
Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?
A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.