What Pope Francis told President Obama about abortion.

What the Pope Told President Obama About Abortion

What the Pope Told President Obama About Abortion

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 28 2014 1:01 PM

What the Pope Told President Obama About Abortion

President Obama and Pope Francis laugh as they exchange gifts during a private audience on March 27, 2014, at the Vatican. Obama might not be laughing when he reads his gift.

Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Reporters following the president in Rome asked a natural question after his meeting with Pope Francis. Did, uh, the whole contraceptive mandate issue come up?

"He actually did not touch in detail on the Affordable Care Act," said the president. "In my meeting with the Secretary of State, Cardinal Parolin, we discussed briefly the issue of making sure that conscience and religious freedom was observed in the context of applying the law.  And I explained to him that most religious organizations are entirely exempt."


The Vatican's own statement was a little less circumspect: The president, it said was told of the Vatican's concern about "religious freedom." This synced perfectly with the emerging (actually pretty standard now) conservative messaging on the mandate, and the arguments heard this week before the Supreme Court. And just as interesting was the pope's gift to Obama, a copy of Evangelii Gaudium. If Obama reads the thing, he'll eventually get to these paragraphs.

Among the vulnerable for whom the Church wishes to care with particular love and concern are unborn children, the most defenceless and innocent among us. Nowadays efforts are made to deny them their human dignity and to do with them whatever one pleases, taking their lives and passing laws preventing anyone from standing in the way of this. Frequently, as a way of ridiculing the Church’s effort to defend their lives, attempts are made to present her position as ideological, obscurantist and conservative. Yet this defence of unborn life is closely linked to the defence of each and every other human right. It involves the conviction that a human being is always sacred and inviolable, in any situation and at every stage of development. Human beings are ends in themselves and never a means of resolving other problems. Once this conviction disappears, so do solid and lasting foundations for the defence of human rights, which would always be subject to the passing whims of the powers that be. Reason alone is sufficient to recognize the inviolable value of each single human life, but if we also look at the issue from the standpoint of faith, “every violation of the personal dignity of the human being cries out in vengeance to God and is an offence against the creator of the individual."
Precisely because this involves the internal consistency of our message about the value of the human person, the Church cannot be expected to change her position on this question. I want to be completely honest in this regard. This is not something subject to alleged reforms or “modernizations”. It is not “progressive” to try to resolve problems by eliminating a human life. On the other hand, it is also true that we have done little to adequately accompany women in very difficult situations, where abortion appears as a quick solution to their profound anguish, especially when the life developing within them is the result of rape or a situation of extreme poverty. Who can remain unmoved before such painful situations?

Very subtle, no international incident required.

David Weigel is a reporter for the Washington Post.