My latest piece covers a day on the Hill when the defenders of the NSA (the House intel committee, basically) offered civil libertarians a deal—like the administration, they were ready to end the government's bulk data collection program. The civil libertarians, led by Sens. Rand Paul, Ron Wyden, and Mark Udall, took the deal, gathering in a power circle and declaring victory.
Except for Paul. Sort of. Paul had made international news by launching a civil suit against the Obama administration, on behalf of anyone whose metadata was collected. He insisted that there remained a Fourth Amendment problem and that the Supreme Court would have to be the final arbiter. This afternoon, he and FreedomWorks (who joined him in the suit) announced their next steps.
While the White House has indicated that new legislation is needed to end mass data collection, a court settlement would put an immediate halt to this illegal and unconstitutional activity. Lead Counsel Ken Cuccinelli sent a letter today to the Department of Justice outlining the terms of a settlement which would accomplish exactly what the White House has called for in the press.
What're the terms of the settlement? Neither Paul nor FreedomWorks said, in their identical statements, and follow-up questions were not answered. Suffice to say that the media-driving lawsuit is not over just because the administration is abandoning the policy that sparked it.
UPDATE: And the settlement language is here:
TODAY IN SLATE
Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola
Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is
I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights
Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.
It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.