America Needs Immigration Reform, but Amnesty Is Not the Answer

Tackling the most important issues of the next 30 years.
Oct. 8 2013 11:58 AM

Amnesty Is Not the Answer

Our current notion of comprehensive immigration reform will boomerang on future generations.

Immigration Reform
America has been—and can continue to be—the most attractive destination for immigrants.

Photo illustration by Lisa Larson-Walker. Photo by Reuters.

This article is part of a series presented by the American Prosperity Consensus in partnership with Slate. To read all the stories in the series, click here.

Over the next two decades, immigration will be a defining issue for America. Immigration strengthens our country and is especially important as native-born Americans have fewer children. A major driver of population growth between now and 2040, in fact, will come from immigration. But it is necessary to differentiate between legal and illegal immigration, and that’s why how we reform the immigration system will determine our nation’s future.

Immigration, of course, also helps those who come here. America is a place of tremendous opportunity for those who seek to work hard and obey the law, and people around the world have taken note. As a result, America has been—and can continue to be—the most attractive destination for immigrants. From Andrew Carnegie to Sergey Brin, many of the greatest American entrepreneurs have been immigrants.

Advertisement

Yet our current system’s bureaucratic delays discourage legal immigration. Likewise, restrictions on those most ready and able to contribute immediately to the economy and the government’s fiscal health—those with in-demand skills and advanced education—in turn restrict America’s ability to benefit from immigration. At the same time, granting amnesty to those who have circumvented the system does a disservice to everyone. It’s vital that we know who is in the country and restrict entry for those who threaten national security, which is why embracing amnesty for those here unlawfully—something enacted in 1986 and proposed again in the Senate’s “comprehensive” approach—would be unfair, costly, and unworkable.

First, it’s unfair because of those already in line. Under our current system, in which we don’t really enforce the law, those who respect the law and wait to come are languishing in line. Those without such scruples are allowed to reside here and ultimately get legal status.

Second, it’s costly because of the generous welfare state. Nobel Prize–winning economist Milton Friedman explained that a nation can’t have both open borders and a welfare state. The share of federal expenditures going to transfer payments (from Social Security, unemployment insurance, and so on) has skyrocketed from 3 percent to 66 percent since 1935. The less-educated tend to have lower incomes and thus receive far more in benefits and services than they pay in taxes; the average illegal immigrant has a 10th-grade education. We can’t afford to worsen our already unsustainable entitlement and welfare programs by allowing unlawful immigrants access to the full panoply of benefits.

Third and last, amnesty is unworkable because it sets us up for more of the same. When Congress and President Reagan granted amnesty in 1986 to some 3 million people, the package included promises to limit future illegal immigration. Those promises didn’t come to fruition, and today we have more than 10 million illegal immigrants.

In predicting the results of the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by the Senate and sent on to the House, the Congressional Budget Office concluded the legislation would reduce illegal immigration by as little as one-third. That means millions would defy the law to enter the country or stay here—and more than likely we’ll be debating another amnesty within a generation. Instead, President Obama should enhance border measures and follow through on the promises of interior enforcement.

America should welcome immigrants from around the globe. In particular, we should welcome those in high-demand occupations such as agriculture (where there indeed may be a labor shortage) and those with higher education (who likely will pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits and services).

Immigration is a defining issue for the future of our country. However, we need to make sure immigration reform is done correctly so as not to create further drag on an already heavily burdened system. As we look toward 2040, the U.S. must recognize that we can  make immigration reform a priority without amnesty.

What do you think is the most pressing issue facing the United States over the next generation? Have your say in the comments section by clicking on the “comment” icon. Your contribution will help define the American Prosperity Consensus project. You can follow the project at america2040.com.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Science

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

The Ungodly Horror of Having a Bug Crawl Into Your Ear and Scratch Away at Your Eardrum

We Could Fix Climate Change for Free. What Exactly Is Holding Us Back?

  News & Politics
Politics
Sept. 17 2014 5:21 PM Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS But the next president might. 
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Gentleman Scholar
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM Should Men Still Open Doors for Women? Or is it ungentlemanly to do so at all?  
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 5:56 PM Watch Louis C.K., Dave Chappelle, Bill Hicks, Mitch Hedberg, and More on New YouTube Channel
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 5:26 PM If Fixing Global Warming Is Free, What’s the Holdup?
  Health & Science
Jurisprudence
Sept. 17 2014 4:49 PM Schooling the Supreme Court on Rap Music Is it art or a true threat of violence?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?