Intelligence Squared debate: Do Grandma's benefits imperil Junior's future? Oct. 4 at NYU.

Live debates about fascinating and contentious topics.
Sept. 23 2011 3:46 PM

Grandma's Benefits Imperil Junior's Future

How you can watch—and participate in—the live Slate/Intelligence Squared debate Oct. 4 at NYU.

Child and her grandmother.
Is entitlement reform necessary for future generations?

As Texas Gov. Rick "Ponzi scheme" Perry may be learning, entitlement reform is a risky issue for any politician seeking national office. Sixty percent of Americans oppose cutting Social Security or Medicare benefits. A candidate with an interest in, say, winning the election, is more likely to support the status quo than advocate for benefit slashing. Off the campaign trail, many economists and politicians insist that cutting entitlements is the key to future fiscal security. Another group counters that other government programs are far more problematic, and should be cut first.

This contentious question of entitlement reform is the subject of the next Slate/Intelligence Squared U.S. live debate on Oct. 4. We'd like to invite you to attend the debate—we're offering Slate readers a 30 percent discount on tickets (see below)—and you're invited to submit questions for the debaters. We'll pick the most interesting one and moderator John Donvan will ask it at the debate.

The proposition of the debate is "Grandma's benefits imperil Junior's future." In other words, do entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid saddle young Americans with unmanageable debt, asking them to sacrifice their future for the sake of today's elderly and poor? Or if we cut these programs, would we be balancing the budget on the backs of the aged and sick, leaving behind society's most vulnerable?

Can't be at the event? Come back here Tuesday night to watch streaming video of the event.

Watch live streaming video from intelligencesquaredus at livestream.com

Join us at NYU's Skirball Center in New York City for an Oxford-style live debate. Fox News commentator Margaret Hoover and Mort Zuckerman, chairman and editor-in-chief of U.S. News & World Report will argue for the motion. Howard Dean, the former DNC Chairman and Gov. of Vermont will team up with Jeff Madrick, the editor of Challenge magazine, to argue against the motion.

If you've got a question for the debaters, write it below in the comments section of this article. We'll select one to read live at the debate. Be sure to include your full name and hometown with your question.

The details about the debate:

When/Where: Oct. 4, 2011 at Skirball Center for the Performing Arts, New York University, located at 566 LaGuardia Place (at Washington Square South).

The evening begins at 5:45 p.m. with a cash-bar reception for panelists and audience members; the live debate starts at 6:45 p.m. and ends at 8:30 p.m. For venue information, click here.

Tickets: $40 ($12 for students with ID). Purchase tickets here, and be sure to enter the special Slate promotional discount code, Slate30, to receive 30 percent off your ticket.

About the Debaters

For the motion:

Margaret Hoover is a Fox News Contributor and the author of the book American Individualism: How a New Generation of Conservatives Can Save the Republican Party. Hoover is a veteran of the Bush Administration White House, where she worked in the Office of Management and Budget and served as associate director in the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs. She's also worked on two presidential campaigns, at the Department of Homeland Security, and on Capitol Hill. Hoover is committed to renewing the Republican Party to enable it to connect with a new generation of Americans, by embracing a conservatism that emphasizes individual freedom and fiscal conservativism as its central pillars.

Mort Zuckerman is chairman and editor-in-chief of U.S. News & World Report and publisher of the New York Daily News. He is also the co-founder, chairman, and CEO of Boston Properties. A frequent commentator on The McLaughlin Group, Zuckerman argues, "A new era of American austerity is the only way to put things right." A recipient of three honorary degrees and a graduate of McGill University, McGill Law School, Wharton Graduate School of Business, and Harvard Law School, Zuckerman is a trustee of Memorial Sloan-Kettering and a member of the International Peace Institute, the Bank of America Global Wealth & Investment Management Committee, and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Against the motion:

Howard Dean is theformer DNC Chairman and governor of Vermont. In 1982, Dean transitioned from a full-time practicing physician to an elected representative in Vermont, serving as governor for 12 years. Dean left office in 2003 to run for president, during which he implemented innovative fundraising strategies via the Internet. During his tenure as the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Dean created the "50-state strategy," a strategy credited with helping Democrats make historic gains in 2006 and 2008. A graduate of Yale University and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Howard Dean currently works as an independent consultant focusing on health care, early childhood development, alternative energy, and the expansion of grassroots politics around the world.

Jeff Madrick, a former economics columnist for the New York Times and current editor of Challenge magazine, is a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books. The author of several award-winning books, Madrick recently authored Age of Greed: The Triumph of Finance and the Decline of America, 1970 to the Present, a Publishers Weekly Top Ten pick for spring 2011 and a Washington Post political bestseller. Age of Greed outlines a vivid history of how greed bred America's economic ills and of the men most responsible for it. Madrick has also served as a policy consultant and speech writer for Senator Edward M. Kennedy and other U.S. legislators.

The moderator:

John Donvan is a correspondent for ABC News Nightline. He has served as ABC White House correspondent, along with postings in Moscow, London, Jerusalem, and Amman.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

The Democrats’ War at Home

How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?

Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best

Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke

Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10

Homeland Is Good Again! For Now.

Politics

Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.

How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.

Building a Better Workplace

You Deserve a Pre-cation

The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.

The Ludicrous Claims Women Are Pitched at “Egg Freezing Parties”

Piper Kerman on Why She Dressed Like a Hitchcock Heroine for Her Prison Sentencing

Behold
Oct. 1 2014 11:48 AM An Up-Close Look at the U.S.–Mexico Border
  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 1 2014 12:20 PM Don’t Expect Hong Kong’s Protests to Spread to the Mainland
  Business
Business Insider
Oct. 1 2014 12:21 PM How One Entrepreneur Is Transforming Blood Testing
  Life
Outward
Oct. 1 2014 11:59 AM Ask a Homo: A Lesbian PDA FAQ
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 1 2014 10:54 AM “I Need a Pair of Pants That Won’t Bore Me to Death” Troy Patterson talks about looking sharp, flat-top fades, and being Slate’s Gentleman Scholar.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 12:26 PM Where Do I Start With Leonard Cohen?
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 11:48 AM Watch a Crowd Go Wild When Steve Jobs Moves a Laptop in This 1999 Demonstration of WiFi
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 1 2014 12:01 PM Rocky Snow
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 30 2014 5:54 PM Goodbye, Tough Guy It’s time for Michigan to fire its toughness-obsessed coach, Brady Hoke.