Does Pope Francis Support Gay Civil Unions?

Outward
Expanding the LGBTQ Conversation
March 5 2014 3:30 PM

Does Pope Francis Support Gay Civil Unions?

Pope Francis waves at the end of his weekly general audience on March 5, 2014.
Pope Francis waves at the end of his weekly general audience on March 5, 2014.

Photo by Andreas Solaro/AFP/Getty Images

In an interview with Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera that appeared today, Pope Francis suggests that some forms of civil unions may be tolerated by the Catholic Church. The pope acknowledged  “diverse situations of cohabitation,” focusing his response on government recognition of nonmarital relationships, for example, where one party may need access to health care. This is the latest in a wave of statements many interpret as the Vatican softening its stance on homosexuality. Don’t be fooled. Francis is not the first pro-gay pope.

Pope Francis reinforced this impression in his response, when he said—-as he has always said—that “matrimony is between a man and a woman.” Despite the pope’s clear and consistent opposition to marriage equality, many media outlets broadcast misleading headlines, tantalizing the millions of liberal, gay-friendly, marriage-equality-supporting Catholics here in the United States. Earlier today, CNN’s homepage declared, “Pope opens door to same-sex unions.” Above a stock photo festooned with a rainbow flag, the Huffington Post said, “Pope Francis Suggests Gay Civil Unions May Be Tolerable.” Neither could be further from the truth.

The pope’s statement could easily be interpreted to mean the extension of legal rights to a caregiver living with a terminally ill loved one. Some civil unions also allow widows who wish to form a new romantic partnership to keep Social Security survivor’s benefits. To give you an idea of how slow things are moving here, this represents progress: Church leaders previously suggested that widows should “have consecrated to God their remaining years in the unmarried state.” Being exceedingly careful not to issue any errant endorsements of a loving commitment between same-sex partners, the pope only suggests that the Vatican should examine and evaluate the circumstances of governmentally recognized relationships.

Advertisement

Bigoted lawmakers in many U.S. jurisdictions used similar logic when drafting anti-marriage equality amendments during the mid-aughts. In 2006, focusing on the perceived illegitimacy of same-sex marriages, Virginia voters approved a referendum that prohibited the “[recognition of] a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage.” In other words, lawmakers made sure that civil unions (including those entered into in other states) didn’t provide a backdoor method for recognizing same-sex partnerships. By denying the very legitimacy of certain relationships, one may also deny the legal rights associated with them. The Catholic Church uses the same logic today.

When Pope Francis reiterated his opposition to same-sex adoption back in December, Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern outlined some theories for why so many were hailing the pontiff as a progressive hero. Stern suggested that liberal Catholics were simply “reviving the old urge for acceptance.” Apparently, the Vatican is fully aware of that desire, having installed a charismatic, tactful, and generally likable pope after the public relations disaster they now call their Pope Emeritus. The church needed a media darling, and it put one into place.

While he may flub his words now and again, Francis’ message is consistent. He is quite capable of playing on popular sentiment in order to gain support. By acknowledging that gay people exist and are—wait for it—worthy of love, Pope Francis endeared himself to legions of followers who clung desperately to their faith through the Benedict years. By entertaining a discussion of gay rights—without ever endorsing them in any fashion—many see hope for acceptance of the LGBTQ community in the future. Upon close examination, though, the pope’s words are calculated, precise, and unforgiving. Same-sex families are not legitimate in the eyes of the Vatican. In the Catholic Church, gays—being humans—have inherent human rights. Gay rights, however, are not human rights.

Tyler Lopez is a writer living in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race

Here’s Just How Far a Southern Woman May Have to Drive to Get an Abortion

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Marvel’s Civil War Is a Far-Right Paranoid Fantasy

It’s also a mess. Can the movies do better?

Behold

Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Watching Netflix in Bed. Hanging Bananas. Is There Anything These Hooks Can’t Solve?

The 2014 Kansas City Royals Show the Value of Building a Mediocre Baseball Team

  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 20 2014 1:50 PM Why We Shouldn’t be Too Sure About the Supposed Deal to Return the Abducted Nigerian Schoolgirls
  Business
Moneybox
Oct. 20 2014 12:37 PM The Fed Will Probably Stop Injecting Huge Sums of Money Into the Economy This Month
  Life
Atlas Obscura
Oct. 20 2014 1:43 PM Chouara: A Striking 11th-Century Tannery in Morocco
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 20 2014 1:10 PM Women Are Still Losing Jobs for Getting Pregnant
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 20 2014 7:15 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 9 A spoiler-filled discussion of "Flatline."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 20 2014 1:26 PM This $248 Denim Jumpsuit Is the Latest Example of a Horrible Fashion Tradition
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 20 2014 1:51 PM Will Amazon Lead Us to the Golden Age of Books? A Future Tense Event.
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Oct. 20 2014 11:46 AM Is Anybody Watching My Do-Gooding? The difference between being a hero and being an altruist.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 10:23 AM Where I Was Wrong About the Royals I underestimated the value of building a team that’s just barely better than mediocre.