The New York Times Doesn't Seem to Understand What Google Plus Is

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Feb. 18 2014 6:56 PM

The New York Times Doesn't Seem to Understand What Google Plus Is


Photo of Google.

Google Plus is more than a social network. It's an identity service. That's why Google hasn't seemed particularly bothered when people rag on Plus for being a backwater, or push back about forced Google Plus integration. Google gets a lot out of information out of knowing who you are when you create content online and do other Internet-y things, and it's not giving that up.

Lily Hay Newman Lily Hay Newman

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.

But is there something afoot? A recent New York Times story about Plus says:

Before Google released Plus, the company might not have known that you were the same person when you searched, watched videos and used maps. With a single Plus account, the company can build a database of your affinities.

Bradley Horowitz, the vice president of product management for Google Plus, tells the Times, “Google Plus ... gives Google that common understanding of who you are.” That sounds terrifying, which is why ValleyWag headlined its story, “Google Admits Google+ Was Just A Ploy To Track Your Behavior Online.”

But Horowitz isn't really admitting anything. Google has been up front about this strategy for 10 years, which in tech time is pretty much an eon.

It's true that since Plus came on the scene in June 2011, Google has focused significant development power on integrating data from Plus so it can sell more targeted ads and figure out whether you're searching for Owen Wilson the celebrity or Owen Wilson your high school friend. But Google was on to you long before Plus ever came along, and your central Google login could endure if Plus were to suddenly disappear tomorrow.

In the last cross-service Google privacy policy before Plus, published in October 2010, Google clearly outlines its desire and ability to track a user across services and synthesize the data freely for advertising, search optimization, content harvesting, or anything else.

When you sign up for a Google Account, we ask you for personal information. We may combine the information you submit under your account with information from other Google services or third parties in order to provide you with a better experience and to improve the quality of our services.

If you click the "Google Account" link, you're taken to a definition that explains:

You may access some of our services by signing up for a Google Account and providing us with some personal information (typically your name, email address and a password). This account information will be used to authenticate you when you access Google services.

Wait, that sounds kind of like that other thing. But it was 2010, six months before Plus debuted. It would be reasonable to think that Google knew what was coming and the company was just setting the stage. Except there has been similar language about Google tracking your data as an individual since the July 2004 privacy policy.

If you have an account, we may share the information submitted under your account among all of our services in order to provide you with a seamless experience and to improve the quality of our services.

That sounds pretty much ... exactly the same. And even if Google Plus were the kernel of an idea in 2004 (which it probably wasn't), it certainly wasn't fleshed out enough to merit a placeholder in the privacy policy. Google has known who you are and what you were doing all along and has been tracking it. Plus is just the tip of an enormous data iceberg.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.


Sports Nut

Grandmaster Clash

One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company


The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.


How to Order Chinese Food

First, stop thinking of it as “Chinese food.”

Scotland Is Inspiring Secessionists Across America

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Sept. 18 2014 10:42 AM Scalia’s Liberal Streak The conservative justice’s most brilliant—and surprisingly progressive—moments on the bench.
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
Sept. 18 2014 12:30 PM “Alt-Ac” to the Rescue? Humanities Ph.D.s are daring to enjoy their “regular” jobs, and the definition of academic success is changing. Sort of.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 18 2014 12:03 PM The NFL Opines on “the Role of the Female”
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 18 2014 11:48 AM Watch the Hilarious First Sketch From Season 4 of Key & Peele
Future Tense
Sept. 18 2014 10:07 AM “The Day It All Ended” A short story from Hieroglyph, a new science fiction anthology.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 18 2014 7:30 AM Red and Green Ghosts Haunt the Stormy Night
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.