Google Is About to Let Total Strangers Email You. Here's How to Opt Out.

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Jan. 9 2014 6:14 PM

Google Is About to Let Total Strangers Email You. Here's How to Opt Out.

Google Plus users can now send emails to your Gmail even if they don't know your address.
Google Plus users can now send emails to your Gmail even if they don't know your address.

Image via the Official Gmail Blog

Google just announced a big change that, as far as I can tell, no one was asking for except perhaps the people who run Google Plus, its failed Facebook clone ubiquitous online identity service.

Starting today, the company is rolling out a feature that lets anyone with a Google Plus account send emails to Gmail users, and vice versa, unless the recipient has opted out. Here's how a Google product manager explains it:

Have you ever started typing an email to someone only to realize halfway through the draft that you haven't actually exchanged email addresses? If you are nodding your head 'yes' and already have a Google+ profile, then you’re in luck, because now it's easier for people using Gmail and Google+ to connect over email. As an extension of some earlier improvements that keep Gmail contacts automatically up to date using Google+, Gmail will suggest your Google+ connections as recipients when you are composing a new email.
Advertisement

Here's what that looks like:

Gmail suggests Google+ contacts

Image via Official Gmail Blog

That sounds potentially useful if you're the sender—and rather invasive if you're the recipient. Google does let you opt out, and every Gmail user will get an email from the company notifying them and pointing them to the privacy settings when the feature goes live. Here's what those privacy settings look like:

How to opt out of "Anyone on Google+" in Google settings

Image via Official Gmail Blog

But a Google spokesperson confirmed to me that the default setting will be "anyone on Google+," so you'll have to change it if you don't want strangers cluttering your inbox. Some critics have quite understandably objected to Google's making this an "opt-out" rather than "opt-in" feature.

Will Oremus Will Oremus

Will Oremus is Slate's senior technology writer.

Google is careful to note that people who send you messages in this way don't actually see your email address. In some ways that seems like splitting hairs—who needs your email address when they can send you emails without it?

But there is a difference, in that strangers can only email you once using the Google Plus feature. If you don't reply or add them to your circles, they won't be able to keep spamming you. Additionally, when someone who's not in your Google Plus circles uses the service to email you, it will go to your "Social" tab in Gmail rather than your "Primary" tab, provided you have tabs enabled. (That's yet another reason to go ahead and enable them if you haven't already.)

On balance, it sounds like this service had the potential to be convenient without being invasive—if Google had made it "opt-in" instead of "opt-out." As it is, my guess is that it's likely to annoy and confuse a lot of Gmail users who barely even know what Google Plus is and won't understand exactly what it is that Google's asking them. A Google spokesperson acknowledged that there's something to be said for "opt-in" policies from a privacy standpoint, but told me that Google felt it was better on balance to make it "opt-out" so that people could first see what it is they're opting out of.

In other words—and to be clear, these are my words, not Google's—they were afraid no one would use it. And that fear overrode the privacy concerns.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

TODAY IN SLATE

Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Video

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

Subtle cues from FedEx, Amazon, and others.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

A No-Brainer Approach to Fighting Poverty: Better Birth Control

  News & Politics
The World
Sept. 16 2014 11:56 AM Iran and the U.S. Are Allies Against ISIS but Aren’t Ready to Admit It Yet
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 12:22 PM Poverty Rate Falls for First Time Since 2006, Remains Way Too High
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 1:51 PM Why Not Just Turn Campus Rape Allegations Over to the Police? Because the Police Don't Investigate.
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 12:30 PM How Steven Moffat Made the Best Doctor Who Episode in Years
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 12:01 PM More Than 3 Million Told the FCC What They Think About Net Neutrality. Why Hasn't Obama?
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 16 2014 7:30 AM A Galaxy of Tatooines
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 8:41 PM You’re Cut, Adrian Peterson Why fantasy football owners should release the Minnesota Vikings star.