How Was a Legally Blind 107-Year-Old Able to Buy a Handgun?

Crime
A blog about murder, theft, and other wickedness.
Sept. 10 2013 4:18 PM

How Was a Legally Blind 107-Year-Old Able to Buy a Handgun?

168159753
A file photo of a semi-automatic pistol.

Photo by Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images

Earlier today I wrote about a 3-year-old girl who shot and killed herself with her father’s handgun. Now I’m going to rotate the circle of life and ask a question that’s been on my mind for a couple of days: How does a 107-year-old man who is nearly deaf and legally blind get cleared to buy a handgun? That’s what I want to know after reading about Monroe Isadore, the Arkansas centenarian who died in a bizarre shootout with police last weekend. As Slate’s Daniel Politi wrote on Sunday, the trouble began when Isadore pointed a gun at two people in the house where he lived; the police were called, a shootout ensued, and Isadore was shot to death. A family friend told katv.com that Isadore had purchased the gun only a month earlier. That should not have happened.

If you’re 18 or over, it’s very easy to acquire a gun in Arkansas. You don’t need a permit, you don’t need a gun license, you don’t need to register the firearm with the state. All you need, apparently, is a valid credit card and a ride to Bass Pro Shops, and you can walk away with the gun of your choice.

Advertisement

But even the states with the most relaxed gun laws realize that, at a certain point, an individual’s right to bear arms is trumped by broader concerns over public safety. And, indeed, in Arkansas you can’t own a gun if you’ve been convicted of a felony, involuntarily committed to a mental institution, or are “adjudicated a mental defective.” These restrictions make sense: it’s a public health risk to put a gun in the hands of someone who is likely to be a danger to himself and others.

By all accounts Monroe Isadore was a peaceful, churchgoing man who was not mentally defective. But he was still 107 years old, unable to see and hear properly, and quite likely plagued by other infirmities. Even if his mind was sharp, he still lacked full command of his senses; even if he was able to hold a gun steady, he still would’ve had trouble knowing what he was shooting at. Some of Isadore’s friends have said that this weekend’s shootout happened because Isadore was disoriented and could not understand what was going on, which seems plausible given his age and apparent decrepitude. In order to safely operate a firearm, you need to be fully aware of your surroundings. Monroe Isadore was physically unable to be aware of his surroundings.

I think it’s clear that he shouldn’t have had a gun. But it’s not immediately clear how Arkansas could have stopped him. Many disability rights advocates believe it is discriminatory to stop people from bearing arms simply because they are blind or physically disabled. (There’s a big debate right now in Iowa over this very issue.) While several states require applicants to take a vision test in order to acquire a concealed-carry permit—Nebraska, South Carolina, others—I’m not aware of any state that bars you from owning a gun for home defense simply because you are old and blind.

You can see the dilemma here. It’s a bad idea to categorically bar the old and infirm from owning guns. But there also ought to be some way for states to weed out people like Isadore whose various health problems might make them a danger to others. This is basically the case for handgun licensing, which Arkansas does not have. In New York state, for instance, you have to apply for a license before you can carry a handgun; licensing officals look at each individual application, and, on a case-by-case basis, approve or deny permits based on their own discretion. This isn’t a perfect system, and it’s certainly subject to abuse, but it probably would have worked well enough to stop an easily disoriented, legally blind, 107-year-old man from buying a handgun, firing it at police, and dying unnecessarily.

Justin Peters is a writer for Slate. He is working on a book about Aaron Swartz, copyright, and the rise of “free culture.” Email him at justintrevett@fastmail.fm.

TODAY IN SLATE

Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

Even When They Go to College, the Poor Sometimes Stay Poor

Here’s Just How Far a Southern Woman May Have to Drive to Get an Abortion

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Marvel’s Civil War Is a Far-Right Paranoid Fantasy

It’s also a mess. Can the movies do better?

Behold

Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Watching Netflix in Bed. Hanging Bananas. Is There Anything These Hooks Can’t Solve?

The Procedural Rule That Could Prevent Gay Marriage From Reaching SCOTUS Again

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 20 2014 3:53 PM Smash and Grab Will competitive Senate contests in Kansas and South Dakota lead to more late-breaking races in future elections?
  Business
Moneybox
Oct. 20 2014 5:39 PM Whole Foods Desperately Wants Customers to Feel Warm and Fuzzy Again
  Life
Outward
Oct. 20 2014 3:16 PM The Catholic Church Is Changing, and Celibate Gays Are Leading the Way
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 20 2014 1:10 PM Women Are Still Losing Jobs for Getting Pregnant
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 20 2014 7:15 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 9 A spoiler-filled discussion of "Flatline."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 20 2014 5:03 PM Marcel the Shell Is Back and as Endearing as Ever
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 20 2014 4:59 PM Canadian Town Cancels Outdoor Halloween Because Polar Bears
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Oct. 20 2014 11:46 AM Is Anybody Watching My Do-Gooding? The difference between being a hero and being an altruist.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.