How long would a liberal have to cry to fill up a Liberal Tears coffee mug?

How Long Would a Liberal Have to Cry to Fill a Coffee Mug With Tears?

How Long Would a Liberal Have to Cry to Fill a Coffee Mug With Tears?

Who's winning, who's losing, and why.
Jan. 24 2017 12:21 PM

I Demand a Weep Count

How long would a liberal have to cry to fill a coffee mug with tears?

170119_POL_liberalTears

Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by iStock.

By now you have probably seen the “liberal tears” coffee mug, a post–Donald Trump riff on the “male tears” merch popular among the ironic misandrist set. Flogged on social media, as often as not beneath tweets by Trump, the mug suggests that its owner is drinking the tears of crestfallen liberals weeping over the election of Trump. How long would a liberal have to cry to fill such a mug with tears?

Long enough to watch Trump’s inaugural speech 180 times. We’ll assume the liberal in question is having a good cry, producing about 20 tears a minute, or one every 3 seconds. A teardrop is roughly 6 millionths of a liter. A standard mug is about 12 ounces, and it would take 354,882 millionths of a liter (or microliters) of liquid to fill 12 ounces—or 59,147 tears. So it would take 2,957 minutes, or more than two days of solid, relentless weeping.

170119_POL_liberalTearsMug
Advertisement

That’s not factoring in evaporation, which, given how long the crying would last, would considerably slow down the process, making the task a Sisyphean one that no human outside of perhaps John Boehner, a decided nonliberal, could ever perform.

But if the liberal did figure out how to summon superhuman determination, hydrate like a triathlete, and seal the mug to avoid evaporation, he or she could make it through quite a bit of sob-inducing material. The liberal could watch his most recent press conference 47 times, the hot-mic Access Hollywood tape 985 times, or this video of Trump’s cameo in a pornographic video 3,696 times.

One more thing

Since Donald Trump entered the White House, Slate has stepped up our politics coverage—bringing you news and opinion from writers like Jamelle Bouie and Dahlia Lithwick. We’re covering the administration’s immigration crackdown, the rollback of environmental protections, the efforts of the resistance, and more.

Our work is more urgent than ever and is reaching more readers—but online advertising revenues don’t fully cover our costs, and we don’t have print subscribers to help keep us afloat. So we need your help.

If you think Slate’s work matters, become a Slate Plus member. You’ll get exclusive members-only content and a suite of great benefits—and you’ll help secure Slate’s future.

Join Slate Plus

Molly Olmstead is a Slate assistant social media editor.