HOME / assessment: Taking stock of people and ideas in the news.

Dave PelzerThe child-abuse entrepreneur.

Illustration by Charlie PowellDave Pelzer, the most famous author you've never heard of, has three books on the New York Times nonfiction paperback best-seller list this week. Pelzer, whose most insistent piece of advice is "don't dwell on the past," dwells on it very profitably. At 39, he has already written a trilogy of memoirs. A Child Called "It": One Child's Courage To Survive chronicles how his mother tortured him from age 4 to 12. It has sold 1.6 million copies and spent two and a half years on the best-seller lists. Its sequel, The Lost Boy: A Foster Child's Search for the Love of a Family rehashes the maternal abuse and documents his wild teen-age years. It has sold a million and had 18 months as a best seller. The final book of the trilogy, A Man Named Dave: A Story of Triumph and Forgiveness, recounts his mother's cruelty again and tells how the adult Pelzer learned to cope with the memory of it. It's been on the list much of this year. CBS, meanwhile, is making a Pelzer biopic that will air in May.

Pelzer's books come programmed for big sales. They straddle all the trendy genres: confessional memoir, childhood trauma, triumph-over-adversity, and self-help. Pelzer also owes his success to tireless marketing. For years he has crisscrossed the country lecturing on child abuse and boosting A Child Called "It." His indefatigable promotion eventually landed him on the Montel Williams Show, which rocketed A Child Called "It" to fame.

But there is a creepier reason for Pelzermania. He has turned child abuse into entertainment. Pelzer likes to be known as the guy who "makes child abuse fun." He repeatedly refers to himself as "Robin Williams in glasses." His public appearances are manic and joking, filled with imitations of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bill Clinton. He craves a career in stand-up comedy. (If Schadenfreude is joy at others' sorrow, what is joy at your own?)

Pelzer's books aren't funny, but they do entertain in a darker way. In Erotic Innocence: The Culture of Child Molesting, James Kincaid argues that child sexual abuse became a cultural obsession in the '80s in part because the stories of abuse were enthralling, at once erotic and grotesque. Pelzer's memoirs lack sexual abuse—the only kind of savagery that's missing—but they appeal to a similar sense of voyeurism and transgression. A Child Called "It" is the most sickeningly violent book I've ever read: It's snuff literature.

As Pelzer tells in A Child Called "It"—then retells in the sequels—his sweetness-and-light California family disintegrated in the mid-'60s. His dipso mother—a Mengele of the burbs—inexplicably singled out the 4-year-old for an escalating campaign of torture. Even as she treated his brothers kindly, she ground Dave's face into soiled diapers and made him eat dog shit. She starved him for weeks at a time and made him vomit after school to make sure he wasn't sneaking food. When he tried stealing scraps from the garbage, she laced the trashcan with ammonia. She forced him to take long ice-cold baths and shoved spoonfuls of ammonia down his throat. Often she locked him in the bathroom with a bucket of ammonia and Clorox: The toxic fumes in the "gas chamber" burned his esophagus and nearly killed him. She beat him with a dog chain, a broom, her fists, burned him on the gas stove, stabbed him in the chest, then left him to clean up the wound. She referred to him as "The Boy" and "It." His feckless, drunken father watched in silence, not daring to risk his wife's wrath.

After eight years of this, Pelzer's teachers rescued him and spirited him into foster care. Eventually he managed to join the Air Force, marry, earn a college degree, and straighten out. His mother escaped punishment because, he says, child-abuse laws were weak in the early '70s.

There are no people in Pelzer's book, only demons (his mother and grandmother), angels (Pelzer and a few foster parents), and incompetents. Psychological motivation scarcely interests him. He makes only a halfhearted effort to explain his mother's lunacy. The point is the suffering. As the trilogy progresses, Pelzer is forced to increase the dosage of wickedness to top what came before. (Iron law of sequels: They must be bloodier than the original.) His mother becomes more cartoonish, more Cruella De Vil. In the first book, she's horrible but erratic. By the third she is the incarnation of pure, calculating evil, saying things like, "You gave me no pleasure, so you were disposed of."

Pelzer's dialogue, which is full of such over-the-top lines, is sometimes suspicious. Though it's reconstructed 20 or 30 years after the fact, it is eerily precise. His stories often seem too elaborate, detailed, and graphic to be real. There's no doubt he was horribly abused, and no one has disputed any of his tales, but they are mostly irrefutable. Everyone who could question them—his mother, father, and grandmother—has died.

Pelzer's fame certainly can't be explained by literary merit. Unlike Mary Karr and Frank McCourt, fellow serial memoirists of terrible childhoods, Pelzer lacks prose ambition. His writing plods. "A single tear" is always rolling down someone's cheek, and he never tires of the "unconquerable human spirit."

Still, Pelzer has other virtues. He really does inspire abuse victims. Online bulletin boards overflow with gratitude from fellow survivors: If he overcame a hellish beginning and made a normal, happy life for himself, then I can too. He relentlessly encourages other troubled kids to be resilient and stop wallowing. He deserves credit for publicizing physical abuse, the déclassé stepsister of sexual molestation. In all the uproar over child sexual abuse, few writers but Pelzer have focused on physical abuse, though it's much more common and often more damaging. Most depictions of childhood trauma paint authority figures as bad-hearted and indifferent. Pelzer, who was rescued by teachers, cops, and social workers and lived with a series of benevolent foster families, honors them. Some teacher-training programs even use Pelzer's book to hearten new teachers about the good they can do.

Pelzer is magnificently free of the New Age spirituality that clogs so much self-help literature. He's Ayn Randian. He survived because of his own strength, not divine intervention. The only god he worships is the god of the self. Unfortunately, he worships it all too much. Pelzer is unspeakably self-congratulatory: "I'm the real deal." He reminds readers of every award: "Here I was, an Outstanding Young Person of the World." His other characters constantly tongue-bathe him: "You're the most inspirational person I know." His book "is one in a million." Everyone else speaks in "ain'ts" and dialect, but Dave always sounds like a Rhodes scholar. He exaggerates his accomplishments. He refueled planes during the Panama invasion and the Gulf War: This he describes as "play[ing] a major role in operations Just Cause, Desert Shield, and Desert Storm." He calls himself a "Pulitzer nominee," though he wasn't a Pulitzer winner or "nominated finalist." Someone may have submitted his book for the award, but by that standard, if you mailed this article to the Pulitzer judges, I would be a "Pulitzer nominee" too.

Out of memoirs (at least for the moment—I'm waiting for A Geezer Called "It"), Pelzer is making a career switch. He doesn't want to be a professional victim anymore. Now he is a guru. His fourth book, Help Yourself: Celebrating the Rewards of Resilience and Gratitude, comes out Monday, and as the title suggests, it's pure self-help. Pelzer does mine the old maternal cruelties again: Every chapter begins with another remembrance of a childhood agony. But the bulk of the book is advice—mostly anodyne. ("You don't need to be a victim"; "Get rid of the garbage in your life"; etc.)

The career switch does not bode well. Pelzer's readers are greedy for horror, and for three books Pelzer has managed to satisfy them. But he is out of goodies. He's rich. He's happily married. He's a loving father. He's learned to deal with the memory of abuse. He's a confessional author with nothing left to confess. He really is just A Man Named Dave, and—take it from another man named Dave—that's rarely enough to sell a million copies of anything.

If you liked this Assessment column, check out Backstabbers, Crazed Geniuses, and Animals We Hate, a collection of our all-time funniest, meanest, sweetest, and weirdest profiles.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
David Plotz is Slate's editor. He is the author of Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned When I Read Every Single Word of the Bible. You can e-mail him at .
COMMENTS

Reader Comments from The Fray:


[Note from the Fray Editor: Was this article like kicking a dog, as one reader complained? There were some heart-wrenching stories in The Fray, and some heated arguments. There was an interesting post from Lynn called "Child Abuse: the next generation". Nearly everyone had great sympathy for Dave Pelzer, but reaction to the books and to the article was divided:]


I have seen Dave Pelzer speak and was concerned for his true mental health. He appeared very rigid regarding scheduling and expectations and almost in a manic stage for most of his speech. I have a Master's degree and have spent 15 years focusing my clinical practice on abused children, and found some of what he relayed to be sensationalized and somewhat self-serving. I do think he has unresolved issues and would do himself some good by tending to them more honestly. Being abused does not necessarily make one an expert on how to best treat it. And yes, I had also suffered extensive abuse as a child, but that part of my life does not give me the expertise to assist others in dealing with their issues--it may give me insight and developed empathy ability. I am concerned about his giving advice as if he is a professional in the field of treatment. I do applaud his efforts to succeed and make it work for him, though.

--Abby

(To reply, click here.)


Obviously and fortunately for you, you have never known what it was like to be a child abuse victim. His books are redundant, but so was his abuse. One of the best ways to write a book to make sure it sells is to write about what you know. Pelzer does this in his own way. In doing so, he also leads the reader down a path to understand and maybe explain hidden areas in their life that they couldn't understand before. I have read all three of his books, and as an adult victim of child abuse, I thought they were excellent in more ways than the average reader ever could understand.

--DB

(To reply, click here.)


Childhood abuse has subtle effects that are not obvious to the unreceptive eye. One of the effects is that once someone will listen, the abused person often is like a dam bursting and needs to express their pain and re-establish their strength continuously until they basically run it to the ground and hopefully eventually can put the past on a back burner. Though Pelzer may be good at helping others and also helping himself he may have issues that in a personal way he can not let go of, and possibly his jovial nature is for his own personal protection.

--Susan Kulkowitz

(To reply, click here.)


It takes courage, as the author of this article displays, to attack sacred cows. We live in a society that has a presumption of innocence, and in a society that says that accused have a right to confront an accuser. And it is proper to point out that such confrontation has never occurred. Or, do we say, that's okay, everyone except accused child abusers have that right. It's proper to point out that Pelzer has made millions on uncorroborated allegations, that it is in his interest that his parents be demons. The author, quite rightly, points out that Pelzer has helped many people rebuild their lives. Good for them, and him. But I suggest that if this man's story is a lie, the harm done to our society by perpetuating a myth exaggerating the prevalence and depth of child abuse has been far greater than any good done.

--Dwight W. Short

(To reply, click here.)

(10/2)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Opposites attract.75/090706_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on race.93/090706_TC.jpg
The apple and the orange.70/090706_TD.jpg