
Richard Blumenthal He was supposed to be president. So why is he only Connecticut's attorney general?
Posted Friday, Sept. 15, 2000, at 8:30 PM ET
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal—catalyst of state lawsuits against Microsoft, Big Tobacco, and now HMOs—is inspiring an emotion that he surely has never inspired before: sympathy. Blumenthal, after all, is the perennial golden boy of New England politics. He's smart, handsome, and rich. He has a great job suing the bejesus out of nefarious corporations. He's nicknamed "Mr. Perfect." Why would anyone feel sorry for him?
Blumenthal, once one of the most promising young Democratic pols in the nation, is languishing. He saw his bid for a federal appeals court judgeship collapse this summer, as the Clinton administration decided he couldn't win Senate approval before Clinton's term ends. Then, when Al Gore named Joe Lieberman as his running mate, Blumenthal seemed to have a free pass to Lieberman's Senate seat. If Lieberman decided to drop his Senate campaign, Blumenthal would have replaced him on the November ballot and waltzed to victory. (There is only token GOP opposition.) But Lieberman is continuing his Senate campaign, so if Gore loses the presidential race, Lieberman will remain in the Senate. And if Gore wins, GOP Gov. John Rowland will appoint a Republican to replace Lieberman. To move up to Washington, Blumenthal would have to wage a tough fight against the GOP incumbent in 2002. (It's also possible that the legislature could call a special election for 2001.) Blumenthal was supposed to be "the Jewish Kennedy." Now the 54-year-old finds himself in the autumn of his career fighting for Joe Lieberman's sloppy seconds.
Blumenthal is blessed with every political virtue except recklessness and luck. His résumé makes Gore's look like a high-school dropout's. Son of a wealthy German immigrant, he graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Harvard, captained the swim team, and was editorial chairman of the Harvard Crimson. He interned a year at the Washington Post, where he became publisher Katharine Graham's aide-de-camp (an early sign of his talent for befriending the rich and powerful).
Pat Moynihan liked Blumenthal's senior thesis on the failure of poverty programs so much that he incorporated much of it into his own book and recruited Blumenthal to work for him in the Nixon White House. At 24, Blumenthal turned down the directorship of VISTA. He enlisted in the Marines rather than duck the Vietnam draft. Then he went to Yale Law School, where he edited the Yale Law Journal, of course. He followed that by clerking for Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, then serving as right-hand man to Sen. Abe Ribicoff. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter appointed him U.S. attorney for Connecticut, making him, at 31, the youngest U.S. attorney ever. He climbed ever upward in the '80s, winning election to the state House and Senate, marrying a rich and beautiful woman, fathering four kids, and still finding time to save an innocent man on death row.
In 1990, Blumenthal was elected to succeed Lieberman as attorney general. AG—a k a "Aspiring Governor"—was supposed to be a transitional job on the way to senator or governor, as it had been for Lieberman. Lieberman had transformed the Connecticut AG's job from part-time backwater into full-time consumer advocacy. What Lieberman had begun, Blumenthal perfected. He turned consumer advocacy into high art and helped lead the nationwide trend of AG activism. According to Yale legal scholar Akhil Reed Amar, Reagan-era deregulation and congressional gridlock left a power vacuum, especially in antitrust law and consumer protection. AGs, always trolling for power and press, rushed to fill it.
Blumenthal proved a master. Ambitious, independent, and fiercely committed to progressive activism, he was creative in finding causes related (however tenuously) to the well-being of Connecticut. He joined the anti-tobacco posse early then led the AGs as they piled on the Justice Department's Microsoft suit. Blumenthal spearheaded the national campaign against deceptive sweepstakes mailings and has taken a prominent role in negotiating with gun manufacturers. (For Jacob Weisberg's analysis of what's wrong with all this AG activism, read "Microsuits.")
Blumenthal attached himself to any popular local crusade he could find. He almost single-handedly banned ATM fees in Connecticut, sued Midwestern power plants for polluting Connecticut air, investigated possible conspiracies to deprive Connecticut of pro sports teams, warred against telephone companies for the practice of "slamming," and pioneered the distribution of "Wanted" posters for deadbeat dads.
He rapidly made himself the state's most popular politician—"a secular saint," as his 1998 GOP opponent Santa Mendoza calls him, sarcastically—because he combined his populist causes with masterful PR and relentless campaigning. His critics smack him with the old line, "The most dangerous place in Connecticut is between Dick Blumenthal and a TV camera." He virtually moved into the CNN studio during the Microsoft proceedings. And Blumenthal is a Terminator on the campaign trail: He attends every funeral and gala and works rope lines as though his life depends on it. Blumenthal isn't a natural glad-hander or even a good one—he's stiff and chilly—but he works like the devil at it.
His endless labor has gone unrewarded because he had nowhere to climb. Fellow Democrats Lieberman and Chris Dodd locked down the two Senate seats, the jobs he most wanted. Blumenthal could have run for governor in 1994, but he didn't want to risk losing in that Republican year. In 1998, he blanched at the prospect of challenging popular incumbent Gov. Rowland. Instead, he ran again for attorney general. Blumenthal is the kind of meritocratic pol who would have done better in a time when politics was more hierarchical. A generation or two ago, a politician with Blumenthal's brains and drive would have been reserved a Senate seat because Democratic Party elders would have ensured it. But in today's more chaotic politics, the prudent Blumenthal has kept waiting and waiting and waiting for his turn. "He's intelligent. He's a decent guy. He just doesn't have the fire for a tough run," says New Haven Advocate political columnist Paul Bass. "He wants it to be handed to him, and it never was."
Unlike most politicians, who become more restrained the longer they serve, Blumenthal has responded to his years of frustration by becoming ever more feisty as attorney general. He pushed the Microsoft suit even as he was passing on the 1998 governor's race. He joined the AGs' assault on gun manufacturers as his potential appeals court seat was slipping away. Last week, as it became clear that Lieberman wouldn't step aside for him, Blumenthal filed the first major class-action lawsuits against HMOs, demanding that four Connecticut insurers improve their patient appeal process, pay doctors promptly, and provide better information about prescription drug coverage. It is just the kind of nasty, fun, popular, and questionable legal battle Blumenthal relishes, and just what he would miss if he ever does make it to the Senate.
If you liked this Assessment column, check out Backstabbers, Crazed Geniuses, and Animals We Hate, a collection of our all-time funniest, meanest, sweetest, and weirdest profiles.












Is It More Important for Your Turkey To Be Organic or Local?
Why Gift Cards Are a Terrible Gift
Is Sarah Palin's Approval Rating Really as High as Barack Obama's?
Justice Scalia's Most Eccentric Habits
Adam Lambert's Refreshing Non-Apology on the CBS Early Show
Democrats Have a Lot To Be Thankful For
Reader Comments from The Fray:
Plotz's article on Blumenthal is the best illustration I've seen of what is wrong with liberal politics. Blumenthal is "smart, handsome, and rich. He has a great job suing the bejesus out of nefarious corporations. He's nicknamed 'Mr. Perfect.' Why would anyone feel sorry for him?" Well, it's thunderingly obvious that's he's a grandstander and ego-tripper. The tobacco suits aren't going to stop smokers from smoking. Banning ATM fees is going to lead to fewer ATMs. Distributing Wanted posters of deadbeat dads isn't going to put the dads in a position to pay. Suing gun manufacturers isn't going to stop criminals. Suing HMOs isn't going to deal with the question of how to control healthcare costs. Blumenthal parades as a moralist but almost none of his initiatives show any understanding of how things work. But what's the use of saying so? He, and Plotz, probably know this but feel good about the charade because it is "fun."
--Oliver O. Ololiuqui
(To reply, click here.)
You won't find me crying any tears along with Slate for poor old Richard Blumenthal. Blumenthal personifies one of the worst aspects of the so-called justice system: the use of civil class action for extortion and/or achieving through fiat what he could not get from a legislature. Tobacco was pure extortion. State governments are not using most of the money to remedy the alleged damages. And if there was any fair (if morbid) accounting, states should be paying the tobacco companies for killing off people before they become longterm health liabilities. If Blumenthal is upset about guns, then let him work to pass a law the old-fashioned way. And who in the world wants Blumenthal, Janet Reno or David Boies deciding what should be on their computer? Blumenthal had the most tenuous of reasons to be in the case in the first place, yet he and his fellow state AG jackals are apparently a major reason why a reasonable deal was impossible.
Let's hope he rots on the vine of Connecticut politics and spares the rest of his the benefits of his "leadership".
--Joe Russin
(To reply, click here.)
Blumenthal is probably not crying over "just" being Attorney General of Connecticut. Far from it. He garners much more publicity and respect by being AG of Connecticut than he would by being a freshman member of the Senate. Like Mike Moore of Mississippi who has turned down numerous opportunities to move on to "better" jobs, Blumenthal knows where the power is, and likes it there. Is it really that clear that he would run for Senate this year had Lieberman stepped aside?
As for 1994, no one knew going in that it was going to be such a great Republican year. After all, Democrats from states such as Oklahoma, Michigan, Tennessee and Maine gave up safe House seats to run for the Senate.
--Peter Friedman
(To reply, click here.)
(9/18)