HOME / assessment: Taking stock of people and ideas in the news.

Spike LeeWhy he should lighten up.

Illustration by Charlie PowellSomething weird is happening at your local multiplex, something that hasn't happened for almost a decade. A Spike Lee movie is playing, and it's actually … fun. The Original Kings of Comedy, which documents four black comedians in concert, isn't very funny—only Steve Harvey consistently hits his marks—but it's surprisingly likable—high-spirited, loose, and rambling.

Savor the moment, because Lee will be invading theaters in early October with a more typical Spike Lee Joint. Bamboozled, which is already making headlines in New York for its provocative ad campaign, concerns a black comedy writer trying to get fired from his white-run TV network. He writes a neo-minstrel show starring blacks in blackface, sure that it will be offensive enough to destroy his career. Instead it becomes a national sensation. The preview suggests that Bamboozled may be Lee at his most portentous and hectoring—a somber satire about comedy, if such a thing is possible.

If Bamboozled is heavy-handed, it won't be a surprise. A creeping didacticism has taken Lee hostage. He has always made message movies. His early films, especially School Daze, Do the Right Thing, and Jungle Fever, shouted out his issues: black economic empowerment, black America's color and class divisions, the danger of white hegemony, the vitality of black popular culture.

But Lee's movies were also hopped up with ambiguity, joy, and humor. Do the Right Thing remains as provocative as it was in 1989: Why does Mookie chuck the garbage can through the pizza-shop window? How much sympathy does Radio Raheem deserve? Lee, who has a sharp ear, crammed his movies with bantering and bullshitting. The three black men hanging out on the sidewalk are a profane, hilarious chorus in Do the Right Thing. Mars Blackmon, Lee's nervous Nike-wearing pest in She's Gotta Have It, is one of the funniest and most memorable characters in recent American film. Crooklyn is suffused with a charming, bittersweet nostalgia.

Lee has never stopped working or experimenting. He is endlessly ambitious. He has jumped genres from musical (School Daze) to biopic (Malcolm X) to road tripper (Get on the Bus) to concert movie (Freak). His subjects range from music (Mo' Better Blues) to black colleges (School Daze) to basketball (He Got Game) to phone sex (Girl 6) to the Son of Sam killings (Summer of Sam). Nor has he restricted himself to movies: Lee makes ads and music videos, writes books, runs a successful ad agency, and still has time for the Knicks.

But along the way, the high spirits have leached away and didacticism has swallowed his movies. Lee's recent films are cluttered with stagy speeches in which a character announces the lesson we should learn from the movie. (Get on the Bus is little else.) Lecturing has replaced questioning. Do the Right Thing succeeds partly because it's never clear who's heroic and because its characters are constantly changing. But the basketball recruiters in He Got Game are pure evil. Get on the Bus has the ethical nuance of a buddy movie. Summer of Sam ends with a heavy-handed near-lynching.

Meanwhile, Lee has sliced the humor from his serious films. Consider the characters Lee himself has played. In his early movies, he played a series of nebbishy, funny pipsqueaks, notably Mars Blackmon, Half-Pint in School Daze, and Mookie. But his characters have sobered up. Summer of Sam marks the nadir: He is a dead-eyed, mono-tonal TV reporter, a character as different from Mars Blackmon as you can imagine.

The trash-talking that crackled through School Daze, She's Gotta Have It, and Do the Right Thing has gone missing, too. Summer of Sam, a film about a tense, violent neighborhood during a heat wave, is an update of Do the Right Thing without the verbal flash and humor. Lee is recycling lines he once played for laughs as straight dialogue. The chorus of Do the Right Thing jokes about how blacks never live up to their big talk. In Get on the Bus, the callow black Republican character echoes the riff, almost word for word, but this time it's supposed to show the speaker's cruelty. (Lee repeats himself: the first time as farce, the second time as tragedy.) Lee may be suspicious of comedy because he would hate to be dismissed as a clown. But his sobriety robs his films of the leaven they need.

(Lee did, of course, just direct The Original Kings of Comedy, but even here his message is political. When Lee talks about why he made it, he never discusses how funny the comedians are. Instead, he focuses on the importance of publicizing black entertainers ignored by white America.)

Lee's directing style—why do it when you can overdo it?—emphasizes his didacticism. His films are stagy and expressionist. He favors bizarre camera angles and histrionic lighting. He repeats intrusive film-school techniques movie after movie, notably his distracting practice of having supposedly walking characters rolled on dollies. As my colleague Slate film reviewer David Edelstein puts it, "He has an unbelievably self-conscious style. He never wants you to forget his presence as the director." Because he permits no respite from his message or his direction, Lee's movies feel claustrophobic. (The Original Kings of Comedy does not feel this way because you can't turn stand-up into a sermon and because you can't play too many directing tricks on a live stage show.)

For all his talent, Lee is not much imitated as a film director. His TV commercials, with their quick wit and quick cuts, have been widely copied, as has his entrepreneurial style. But not his artistry. No director, except perhaps John Sayles, shares Lee's unflagging seriousness. And actors are too powerful in Hollywood to allow many control maniacs like Lee to flourish. (When Martin Scorsese directs a film, it can be an "Al Pacino movie" or a "Robert De Niro movie." When Steven Spielberg directs, it can be a "Tom Hanks movie." But a Spike Lee film is never a "Denzel Washington movie" or a "Wesley Snipes movie." It is always a Spike Lee Joint.)

There is a medium where Lee is not disappointing these days: documentary. Perhaps the best movie he has made in the past decade is 4 Little Girls, a nonfiction account of the 1963 Birmingham, Ala., church bombing that killed four black girls. He brought his visual energy and fierce intelligence to the project, but documentary subdued his style. There was only so much "directing" he could do. He was locked to the facts. He didn't have actors he could order around. He had to work with real people. This restraint made 4 Little Girls clear, smart, and passionate.

No one who pays $8 for a feature film on a Friday night really wants speechifying and moralizing, which is why watching recent Lee features is often irksome. But documentary-goers expect and even demand speechifying and moralizing, which is why watching 4 Little Girls isn't.

If you liked this Assessment column, check out Backstabbers, Crazed Geniuses, and Animals We Hate, a collection of our all-time funniest, meanest, sweetest, and weirdest profiles.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
David Plotz is Slate's editor. He is the author of Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned When I Read Every Single Word of the Bible. You can e-mail him at .
COMMENTS

Reader Comments from The Fray:


What Plotz apparently doesn't understand at all about black culture, and what Lee understands so well, is that we blacks have indeed throughout our history always made speeches. That's what the marginalized and powerless and scorned do. They often can't do much else. And they are often ridiculed in their own communities--and in their own minds--for doing so. But this is a crucial feature of black self-identity and survival. It's also much of the subtext of the black comedy that Plotz claims to understand and admire. And it's why Lee's Get on the Bus is such a moving piece of work; that movie showed black men trying to talk their way into recognition and dignity and respect because they were having so much trouble securing those things in real terms in the real world.

I haven't admired every moment of every Spike Lee film. Like any artist, he can sometimes lose focus. But thank goodness he's not making films for, as Plotz has it, those who spend "$8 for a feature film on a Friday night" and who therefore, supposedly, don't want to hear speeches. So, what do they want? Well, let's just remember that it's Plotz, the critic, who's posing that crowd-pleasing question, not Lee, the artist, who's trying to make films that make a difference--seven days a week.

--Ivan Webster

(To reply, click here.)


The absence of a speech is a speech. And that certainly goes for "entertainment, that people are willing to pay $8 for" as well. Anybody will concede that Malcom X was less "pleasant" to watch than Do the Right Thing. Both are works of a truly vital filmmaker--as is the incredible cultural tour de force of an actually subversive Jaguar ad.

--Manuel Cruz

(To reply, click here.)


I get the feeling from Plotz's article that he'd like Lee's movies more if they undercut themselves more, if they employed the self-distancing irony endemic to most 'hip' filmmaking and fairly visible in the mainstream.

The demand for humor is typical of white audiences. The demand for ambiguity is similar. It's historically specific, middle-class, and slightly tinged with a sense that we could live a little easier with white guilt if we heard the occasional "just kidding." Well, no serious story teller of Black America owes any audience a "just kidding." And any is free to provide it to suit the ends of the story.

Having leapt to Lee's defense, let me bash him unambiguously on one front: his shameless shilling for Nike depends on a racist willingness of Americans to exploit non-whites the world over. The question is never really put that way, but one wonders how Lee would respond if Nike extracted as much wealth from African countries as it does from Pacific Rim and Central American lands.

--Wrongshore

(To reply, click here.)


The reviewer forgot the brilliant and seriously under-rated work Spike did in Clockers. He also could take some of his own advice because the article was as preachy and opinionated as he claims Spike's movies are. There are enough other filmmakers out there working in the ghetto-lite genre already, there is no need for Spike to join the fray. My real beef with the more recent joints is that he has wallowed in exploitative sex scenes involving white women. He treats black sexuality with a good deal more tenderness and respect, even when the sex is casual.

--Kathryn Ross

(To reply, click here.)


[Notes from the Fray Editor: Felix Salmon says Martin Scorsese has never made a movie in which Al Pacino appears, while another poster compares Lee's take on inter-racial relationships with that of D.W.Griffith. And other readers thought Bamboozled sounded like an Isaac Asimov story, Author Author, or the Mel Brooks film The Producers.]

(9/5)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Very superstitious.90/091113_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on unemployment.50/091113_TC.jpg
Streep 2.0-8.0. 1/122939/2183724/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg