
The Brother From Another PlanetTalk to us, Tiger: What's the secret of life?
Posted Tuesday, Aug. 22, 2000, at 3:00 AM ET
I think Tiger Woods owes the world an explanation. With yesterday's victory in the PGA tournament, he put still more distance between himself and all mortals who have ever played golf. Even Jack Nicklaus, long considered the greatest ever, now concedes that he was never this good. The only question left is: What exactly is Woods' secret? That is the question that Woods is now morally obliged to address.
For Woods not to reveal his secret is to hoard a precious resource. It's like OPEC deciding to stop oil production altogether. In fact, it's worse than that. Oil is just oil. What Woods possesses is the secret of life. After all, the things that keep you from succeeding in golf (I speak from experience) are things that can keep you from succeeding in life: getting unhinged by recent mistakes, getting nervous about what observers will think of you, letting your intense dislike of rivals distract you from the important task of abjectly humiliating them, and so on. The key to golf is focus, the key to life is focus, and Tiger has the key.
I've done my share of armchair theorizing about what makes Woods great. I've argued that he uniquely manages to reconcile Attila the Hun's competitive fury with a Gandhiesque equanimity. I've argued that his Buddhist upbringing was essential to the equanimity part. But enough speculation. It's time for Woods to venture beyond the terse, stock answers he gives on those network TV interviews, to speak candidly about matters of golf and spirit. He needs to spend an hour with a probing interviewer. I volunteer for the job.
Now, I realize Woods is a busy man. So I hereby offer him FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS to sit down for an in-depth chat with me. And I may be able to use my Slate connection to land a matching grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which would bring the total up to a cool one thousand. Plus, Slate's editor, Mike Kinsley, after some cajoling, has agreed to throw in a dollar. Let me summarize: As much as ONE THOUSAND AND ONE DOLLARS can be Tiger's for answering a couple of dozen questions about life and golf, and one or two questions about my backswing.
I'm serious—not about me doing the interview, but about the need for somebody to do a revealing interview. TV interviewers typically use their two or three minutes with Tiger to ask questions such as: How does it feel to win the U.S. Open on Father's Day? (Correct answer: good.) We need questions that will generate news you can use. For example:
1) Woods has said Buddhism is important in his life, but, to my knowledge, he hasn't elaborated. Does he meditate every day? By answering "yes" he could change the daily rhythms of life for millions of golfers, maybe even inject a little ashram ambience into suburban country clubs. (Ever seen the movie Caddyshack? Picture Rodney Dangerfield in the lotus position.)
2) Bobby Fischer, the eccentric chess champion of a few decades ago, once said that his favorite thing about chess was the moment when he looked across the board and could tell that his opponent's ego was crushed. Does Tiger have similar feelings? Or has he attained the sort of detachment that the Buddha would counsel, and that in principle should be good for your golf game by screening out distracting impulses of animosity?
And so on … Until people start asking Woods such questions, and he starts answering them, he'll remain an enigma. He might as well be a visitor from an advanced civilization in another galaxy—which, actually, is a theory I haven't ruled out.
Postscript: In my last column on Woods, by way of stressing the natural link between Buddhism and golf, I noted the importance of emptying your mind of conscious thought at the moment of your swing. A reader wrote in to "The Fray" arguing that baseball sage Yogi Berra had made the same point in saying that you can't swing and think at the same time. (This prompted another reader to quip that maybe that's why they called him Yogi.) It's true that thought can be the enemy of performance in just about all sports. The difference is that in most athletic endeavors—including hitting a baseball—you're reacting to something, so you don't have time to think anyway. Many sports have their momentary exceptions, such as shooting free throws in basketball (which, as Shaquille O'Neal has proved, can become a serious mind-control problem). The nearly unique thing about golf is that it is never reactive. Every shot you take is an invitation to overthink, to become a head case—an invitation that it has always been my policy to accept.
Did the NYT Just Call Joe Biden the Second Most Powerful Vice President Ever?
Meet the TV Genius Behind Jon & Kate, Table for 12, and the Duggars
Does the Health Reform Bill Really Restrict the Rights of Gun Owners?
Don't Fall for Best Buy's Scam To "Optimize" Your New Macintosh
Would Sen. Obama Approve of President Obama's Afghanistan Plan?
How Roald Dahl's Stories for Children Eclipsed His Fiction for Adults












Reader Comments from The Fray:
Robert Wright overlooks the obvious explanation: Tiger has the perfect genes for a golfer. Attributing his talents to Buddhism is particularly strange: he was already a celebrated golf prodigy at age 3. Boy, Buddhism must be particularly amazing if it can work on a child by the time he can learn to speak! This makes as much sense as saying that being a Freemason was the secret of Mozart's musical talent. In reality, Tiger's secret is probably his multiracial genetic background. He appears to have gotten just the right combination of different races' traits: eg African strength and masculine charisma, Southeast Asian flexibility, Chinese focus, American Indian stoicism etc.
--Steve Sailer
(To reply, click here.)
The only historical exception I can think of to the theory that golf is purely reactive was Nicklaus' one-iron on the 17th at Pebble Beach in the last round of the '72 Open. I heard him state in an interview that once he began his downswing he felt his clubface was too open and made the adjustment prior to contact! With a one-iron, no less! Famously, the shot hit the flagstick, and Nicklaus barely missed a hole in one. This is either the most ridiculous boast in the history of golf, or all the proof needed (if any is) that golf at the highest level requires as much athletic skill as any other sport. I suspect Woods will provide plenty of other examples before he is done, if he hasn't already.
--Will Allen
(To reply, click here.)
This is not a trivial matter. If Tiger knew that people were puzzling over his success to this extent he might agree to at least a email question and answer. Pursue. Pursue!!!!!
--Hugh Van Dusen
(To reply, click here.)
[Note from the Fray Editor: Disappointingly, no Fray posters wanted Robert Wright to Pursue! so much that they offered money to increase the pot for Tiger Woods--they confined themselves to pushing other interviewers, theories about golf swings, and (from a former Slate intern) a film/book suggestion.]
(8/22)