Slate's Bizbox
everyday economics: How the dismal science applies to your life.

Attack of the Giant Shopping Carts!!!A few theories on why they got sooooo big.

By Steven E. Landsburg
Posted Thursday, April 27, 2000, at 3:00 AM ET
Illustration by Robert Neubecker

For the past three decades, only one economic variable has exhibited strong steady growth year in and year out. I refer, of course, to the size of shopping carts. According to the grocery store managers I just spoke to, today's average cart is almost three times as large as its 1975 counterpart. That's remarkable because by 1975 the growth spurt had already been underway and apparent to economists for several years.

Although I can't conjure a citation from NEXIS or the Web, Ralph Nader is said to be one of the first to notice the growing-shopping-cart phenomenon. He is said to have offered it as a prime example of how consumers are manipulated by unscrupulous capitalists: Bigger carts were designed to shame consumers into bigger purchases.

Even if we accept the dubious presumption that a normal shopper would be embarrassed to have the neighbors see him roll up to the checkout line with a half-full cart, this explanation lacks fundamental logic. That's because it's a story about why shopping carts are big, not a story about why they're getting bigger. As soon as some clever grocer figures out that big carts mean big purchases, carts should immediately get bigger—and stay that way.

Shortly after the big cart hypothesis surfaced in the mid-'70s, the topic started showing up on exams in the economics department at the University of Chicago, usually attached to a question such as, "Explain why Mr. Nader can't be right, and offer an alternative explanation that can be right." The answer the professors had in mind was this: Until recently (or what was then recently), most households had a member (usually called the "wife") whose full-time job description included a weekly shopping trip. The entry of women into the work force changed all that, so shopping trips became less frequent and shoppers wanted to buy more per trip.

There's an old joke about the graduate student who discovers that the exam questions are the same every year but that the answers are always different. As the shopping cart question grew to legendary status, students began competing to offer new and more creative solutions. Nowadays I teach a freshman honors seminar in economics, and I often throw the question out to my class on the first day. To my never-ending surprise and delight, I get at least one new and thoughtful answer every time I do this.

For example: People are a lot wealthier now than they were 30 years ago. That means they are willing to pay higher prices for the luxury of shopping in wide aisles. (Wide aisles drive up prices because they require a bigger investment in land.) Once you've got the wide aisles, you might as well have the bigger carts. (Actually, this one came not from a student, but from my father—thanks, Dad.)

Or: Houses are a lot bigger now than they were 30 years ago. That means more space in the pantry, so people can buy more food on each trip.

Or: Most people used to shop with cash, and their purchases were limited by the amount of cash they were willing to carry. As credit cards became ubiquitous, more and more shoppers were willing to fill up a big cart. This one is testable: It predicts that stores will offer a mix of small carts (for cash shoppers) and large carts (for credit card shoppers) and that the proportion of large carts should grow over the years. By contrast, some of the other theories predict a steady growth in the size of all carts.

Or: Now that people are richer, they're more likely to cook several dishes for the same meal. Or: Now that people are busier, they're more likely to eat separately rather than as a family, and hence to cook more meals per household per day. (Of course, this also cuts the other way—busier families are more likely to eat at restaurants.)

Or: Technological improvements have made it easier for each family member to have the food he prefers. Frozen dinners are a lot better now than they used to be, so a family of five is more likely than before to eat five frozen dinners than to share a single meatloaf. Sometimes even a minor innovation can have a huge effect on purchasing habits. When packaged pies were available only in 14-inch sizes, apple was the best-selling flavor. When 7-inch pies became available, apple immediately fell to somewhere around fifth place. That's because in the old days, the whole family had to agree on a pie, and apple was everyone's second choice. Now that everyone can have his own pie, very few choose apple.

One reason I like throwing this problem out to the classroom is that it gives us a chance to talk about the difference between a good and a bad theory. A good theory doesn't just explain why shopping carts grow; it has to explain why they've grown at this particular time. Changes in income, changes in the labor-force participation of women, changes in payment habits, and changes in technology are all plausible starting points for a good theory.

By contrast, a theory that says shopping carts are large because people like to have a lot of vegetables is no good unless you explain why people have gradually come to like vegetables more over this particular time period—and why people who are buying more vegetables would not buy correspondingly less meat. A theory that blames the whole thing on more effective advertising, creating an army of zombielike consumers who must have their morning Trix, is no good unless it explains why Trix don't just replace corn flakes.

I once did a radio call-in show in Pittsburgh called "Economist With Attitude." I asked the shopping cart question, callers offered solutions, and there was a prize for the one I disliked the least. I am dismayed to report that I don't remember the prize-winning entry. Is there a reader from Pittsburgh who can remind me? Drop me an e-mail at .

Better yet, if you have an explanation that should have won, send it to . I'll append this column with the best explanations.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Steven E. Landsburg is the author, most recently, of More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics. You can e-mail him at .
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Reader Response from The Fray:


Can someone please explain the regional difference in shopping carts in the United States? In North Carolina and other Southern states, since the 1970s shopping carts are higher off the ground and have gates that open in front. The bottom of the basket is at the same level as the cashier's work station. At the checkout line, the cashier puts down the gate, reaches in, and slides the food across the UPC reader. You don't have to touch your purchases until they are already bagged. In New Jersey and the Northeast (as in North Carolina 30 years ago), the carts are larger, the baskets are lower and they have no front gate, so you have to reach down to take your food out. This puts the customer back to work. If you have a bad back or are short, this it is painful or awkward. The checkout lines are equipped with electric conveyor belts, which cost money and aren't needed in the South.

Add to the mystery: carts are larger in New Jersey, but families tend to be larger in North Carolina. The service is better for the customer in North Carolina, even though consumers are on average wealthier in New Jersey and New Jersey has more grocery store competition due to denser population. This difference has persisted for over 20 years, even though everyone who has lived in both areas agrees that the Southern system is superior, and it does not seem more expensive for stores in either labor or materials.

--Arthur Stock

(To reply, click here.)

(4/27)


[There was an enormous response from readers with views about shopping carts, and Mr Landsburg will return to the topic soon. In the meantime here are a few choice theories:]

Once the stores, for external reasons, got big enough to handle them, the carts got bigger because there was an upside (more convenience for--and thus greater profit from-- shoppers with many dozens of items, or bigger items like hundred pound sacks of dog food etc), and no downside for those of us picking up a box of cereal and a jug of milk.

--Dick Riley

(To reply, click here.)


It seems to me that the growing shopping carts are paralleling the expansion of our country's waistline. Didn't we break the 50 percent mark this year? If I remember correctly the newest figures show that more than half of all Americans are overweight. Fatter people eat more food and thus require larger carts to haul this growing amount of food to the register. To support this argument it would be interesting to know if the number of all-you-can-eat places has been on the rise as well, and have restaurant portion sizes been increasing?

As for why we are getting fatter, I don't know, bigger shopping carts maybe?(Just kidding.) Ease of accessibility? An over-indulgent society? And we still have to fit--now obese--kids in the shopping carts so I guess we need bigger carts (sorry).

--Dana Haasz

(To reply, click here.)


Having shopped for groceries for about 40 years, I can tell you one possible reason why grocery stores have switched to larger carts. They want to keep me shopping as long as possible. When I shop, I tend to stop when the cart gets full. So--the larger the cart, the greater the chance I'll buy several items I'd have passed up if I had a smaller, full cart. And those extra items tend to be discretionary items, which usually cost more and, I assume, have a higher profit margin.

It's not a really big mystery--it's just that someone finally started paying attention to how people actually shop (probably when men started having to do some of it--ever see how awkward a big man looks pushing one of those tiny old-fashioned carts?).

And by the way, you'll find Occam's Razor on aisle 6B.

--Linda

(To reply, click here.)


In my local grocery store they have Kiddy-Sized shopping carts for kids to push around that display a flag declaring "customer in training." There is something about that that makes me uneasy.

--George P. Hickey

(To reply, click here.)

(4/28)

Washington Post