Paul:
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponSomewhere outside of Decatur, Ga., in the bathroom of a Krispy Kreme, Newt Gingrich is sobbing uncontrollably. George W. Bush vows to spend (!) $5 billion (!!) on literacy (!!!)? Al Gore should declare victory and go home. Is that what running for national office as a Republican has come to? Co-opting the Democrats' big government, budget-busting agenda? And epoxying yourself to a motherhood-type issue, one that no one could possibly oppose? Way to make the hard choices, Dub.
Of course, that's not me talking. I would never been that snarky and cynical. That's what his enemies will say (and, privately, maybe even some of his friends). Illiteracy is absolutely a serious issue, and if he can get more kids to read, we'll all be better for it. But when I saw the story of Bush's proposal on the front page of today's Times, I thought to myself, That's it; the Democrats are going to win back the House, and Gore is in much better shape than we think. If this turns into an election about education and other so-called "soft" issues, including Social Security and health care, the Repubs are dead. Overwhelmingly, the public believes this is D rather than R territory; add in gun control, which is likely to be a major sticking point in the fall thanks to that sweet-natured Wayne LaPierre, and you can imagine a scenario in which Bush is constantly on the balls of his feet, never off, with the end result being that no Texan ever gets to utter the words "Governor Rick Perry."
That possibility—Bush losing—seemed fantastical only a couple of months ago, and yet we all talk about it here (c'mon, admit it; even you, Paul) with alarming regularity. The reason, I'd submit, is that you can't really run as an outsider in American politics and win. Outsider is code for "inexperienced as a campaigner, with inexperienced campaign staffers leading the charge." You know who ran as an outsider? Ross Perot. John McCain. Look where it got them. Bush loves to talk about how his area code is 512, not 202. Well, he's paying for it. The mistakes he's made—Bob Jones, not taking McCain seriously, blowing off New Hampshire till the last minute, his passive-aggressive approach to the press—can all be chalked up to having never done this before and to not having people who have done it guide him through the process. Which is fine; there's no law against learning by doing, and if Bush really wants to change the culture of Washington, it would be hypocritical at best and incredibly dumb at worst to put his campaign in the hands of the Charlie Blacks and Bob Teeters of the world, who are the culture of Washington. Still, I can't help but wonder what might have been if he'd put as much energy into planning his campaign as he put into funding it. As a resident of Texas, and as someone who genuinely likes Bush personally, I'm just plain disappointed in how things have gone. And I don't blame the handlers. I blame the guy who hired them.
Yrs.,
Evan
Twitter and Google Couldn't Stop Facebook. Can Anyone?
Nine Theories for Why It's So Hard To Find Chocolate in China
Why Is Buttoning Up Your Shirt All the Way Hollywood's Shorthand for Retarded?
George Clooney Almost Convinced Me To Like Up in the Air. Almost.
Why Is More Than Half of Congress Still Not on Twitter?
The Best Thing About Alice: Kathy Bates as the Queen of Hearts
Reader Response from The Fray:
[Note: Should be read after most recent Dialogue entry of the week.]
I find Ms Hart's (perfectly legitimate) complaint [Wednesday] about the "news columns"--ie, that they're showing an abominable if visceral loathing of Mr Bush--quite charming in its innocence. She seems to have somehow managed to avoid realizing that such an attitude has colored reporting of the Clinton administration for years, of Mr Gore, and indeed of just about any gopher who stuck his head up far enough to be hit with a mallet. The sole recent exception---the esteemed Senator from Arizona---avoided this solely by pandering to the reporters' idiot sense of their own moral and intellectual superiority and even he would have been savaged had he had any chance of victory.
I don't particularly like Mr Bush, but he was elected twice by a real state and he did manage to generate an awful lot of money and support among real people. I'm not awfully fond of Mr Gore, but he is pretty smart and well-educated and any sensible analysis of his fundraising activities needs to balanced against a history in which Republicans outspent Democrats dramatically--it's hard not to see Republican complaints about the Clinton/Gore fundraising as analogous to their complaints about many of the administration's policies: how dare they steal our issues/our techniques?
I think they both deserve to be treated seriously, courteously, and dispassionately. The chance of this happening in the current media atmosphere is about equal to the chance I will wake up tall, blonde, and skinny. Why does not a professional journalist realize this as well?
--Alan Kornheiser
(To reply, click here.)
(3/31)
I'm not surprised Governor Bush could impress the Texas Monthly writers with his policy expertise in a friendly, sympathetic small-group discussion. Most journalists hardly study policy at all; very little expertise is required to impress them. And, there isn't a politician alive who does not look more impressive talking to a sympathetic small group than he does to a large audience.
I didn't see any recognition in their discussion that a Governor's education policy, however successful, might not be terribly relevant to the conduct of foreign relations and management of the Pentagon. Yet the next President is very likely going to spend much more time in each of these areas that in education, all campaign rhetoric to the contrary notwithstanding.
Finally, I had to laugh at the comment that a dropped "g" at the end of the word "asking" identifies Bush as a Texan. Here in Wisconsin we have a very successful Governor who uses only two "g's", the one in "Governor" and his middle initial. I promise you that no one will ever mistake Tommy Thompson for a Texan.
--Joseph E Britt
(To reply, click here.)
Uh, who the hell is Joe Nick? And what is he so cranky about? Am I missing something?
--Paul
(To reply, click here.)
[Yes you were. Joe Nick Patoski replied here, filling in with the missing entry that made everyone else think he was cranky.]
(3/28)