Caveat MercatorDon't spend a lot of time worrying about online credit card fraud. Unless you're a merchant.
Posted Friday, Feb. 11, 2000, at 3:30 AM ET
Is it safe to buy things online? News reports make charging things on the Web sound as dangerous as shopping in downtown Grozny. A hacker recently stole thousands of credit card numbers from e-tailer CD Universe and is holding them hostage until the company accedes to his demands. An MSNBC reporter revealed the lax security at seven Web sites by accessing credit card info on them. And a consumer who shopped at Amazon.com is blaming the company for the fraudulent billings that subsequently appeared on his credit card.
The short answer is shopping online is safe as long as everybody does their homework. The longer answer is too many merchants are flunking Computer Security 101.
Credit card fraud predates the Internet, of course. New cards are routinely stolen from mailboxes. Dumpster divers steal credit card receipts for the valid numbers printed on them. Bunco artists call unwitting consumers and pry card info out of them. Other crooks broker the purloined numbers to their fellow criminals.
Despite all this rampaging fraud, most consumers suffer only the slightest of dings. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act, consumer liability for fraudulent card charges is limited to $50, and many card companies cover those damages, depending on the circumstances. Moreover, some merchants (such as Amazon.com) will refund that $50 if the fraud was their fault. Bricks-and-mortar merchants, who run the physical credit card through a credit card reader—and who can also check signatures and ask for photo IDs—are also indemnified by credit card companies for fraudulent charges. But online and mail-order merchants are a different case. They must swallow every fraudulently billed credit card dollar.
But before we explore the Web merchants' credit card nightmare further, let's make sure you're shopping safe.
-
Is your computer secure? Click here to make sure.
-
Be cautious. Don't give out your vital numbers to strangers. Or your mother's maiden name. Don't share passwords.
As described in a previous "WebHead," the "SSL protocol" in the latest browsers securely transfers your information to the merchant. The link between the merchant and the payment processor is equally secure. And the payment processors, the companies that actually authorize your credit card information, tend to have the best security money can buy.
The weakest link in the chain is the merchant. MSNBC's reporter successfully hacked those merchant sites because the proprietors hadn't changed the database's default user name and password. But no hacker would have gotten as far as the database sign-in page at a properly designed Web site. Another vulnerable zone is internal security. Disgruntled employees are always walking off the job with credit card information, and other naughty employees sometimes take advantage of poor internal security to program "back doors" in the site's code so they can slip in undetected and steal information.
There's no way for you to know which merchants practice safe shopping. Although several independent organizations perform security audits of e-commerce systems, merchants have yet to publicize the results in any organized fashion. Not surprisingly, the larger, more established online merchants tend to be the most vigilant about security.
But even at the big-name sites, merchants have a hard time spotting a fraudulent transaction unless the card has been reported stolen. When a credit card purchase is made on the Web or over the phone the card issuer (American Express or a bank that issues Visa or MasterCard) makes a rudimentary attempt to verify the customer's identity by comparing the address given to the merchant with the card's billing address on file. The "Address Verification System" used by card issuers only looks at the first five digits of the street address and the first four digits of a ZIP code. Cards issued internationally don't typically use AVS, for legal (some European privacy laws forbid it) and technical (some European banks are just plain low-tech) reasons. As a result, the fraud rates on these cards are so high that some U.S. merchants won't take them.
Card issuers routinely detect fraud by analyzing card usage. In the old days, the best way to exploit a physical stolen card was to "burn it to the ground"—charge goods rapidly at a bunch of different stores before the theft was reported. Most banks now detect suspiciously high "transaction velocities" with software from HNC and deny further purchases until the cardholder is contacted. I have a friend whose legitimate shopping spree triggered the transaction-velocity tripwire and caused a few retailers to grill him.
If a credit card
purchase passes the address and velocity hurdles (and the customer hasn't exceeded his spending limit), the transaction is authorized. Now the merchant waits anxiously for a "charge back" notice—a bank message informing him that the cardholder has disputed the charge. Each "charge back" costs the merchant the amount of the charge, plus a fine, plus a potential increase in the credit card fees the merchant must pay the bank.
To reduce "charge backs," online merchants use common sense to flag suspicious purchases. For instance, an online store that typically takes $50 orders does a double take when it gets a $1,000 order. But clever thieves fly below the radar by making infrequent, relatively small purchases at a variety of shops. A cardholder who doesn't check his statements assiduously may not notice the fraud for many months.
Some credit card fraud cannot be foiled. An accomplished "identity thief" armed with your Social Security number and a few other critical facts about you (I'm not telling!) can set up a credit card under your name, but have it sent to his P.O. Box. He can quickly run up big bills that he'll never pay and damage your credit in the process.
Fraud rates are highest on digital products such as a subscription to an online magazine or downloadable software. With no shipping address, the identity thief cannot be tracked down. Another popular scam is the "Real-Time Triangular Trace," in which credit card thieves reap cash. Here's how it works: The thief advertises a $500 color printer on eBay for $250, and the lucky person who wins the auction sends the check for $250 to the thief's P.O. Box. Meanwhile, the thief purchases the printer from an e-tailer with a stolen credit card and sends it to the auction winner's address. (Some credit card fraud is perpetrated less professionally, as this anecdote from my company's files illustrates.)
Commercial fraud-screening software from CyberSource, HNC, and other companies helps to spot the bad guys. Every Internet connection requires an IP address—a numeric identifier issued to every computer connected to the Internet. So, if the street address of the cardholder making a purchase is in Texas, but the connection's IP address is in Russia, screening software can sniff out the possible crime. The problem with screening software is that it turns up occasional false positives, such as when a Texan shops online from a Russian hotel. What's a merchant to do? Let the potential fraud through or insult a valid customer? And even when fraud is presumed, sleuthing it out is not a top priority for law enforcement. These are small-scale crimes, difficult to trace across state lines and international borders. FBI and Interpol aren't interested. Believe me, my company has called them.
Thieves and merchants will continue to duel on the Internet, as more inventive scams challenge more sophisticated screening software. Eventually, the merchants and card issuers will get the help they need from law-enforcement agencies, and the card issuers will tighten up their security. But until then, watch your wallet, read your credit card statement, and think twice before buying stock in online merchants. (Oh, did I just write that?)
- Your New Small Business Committee Chairwoman
- Count Yourself In On the Money-making
- The Obama Stimulus Plan and Small Business
The Day She Was Sent to Auschwitz
Girl Who Pretended To Be a Guy Now Pretends To Be Crazy
The Proper Way To Flagellate Yourself During Ashura
The Miserable Fate of Democrats Who Endorsed McCain
What Obama's Justice Department Appointees Should Fix First
Algerian Guy Walks Across America, Decides We're Pretty Nice










Highlights from The Fray
I think if you ask the crypto-community whether the strength of SSL is up to the level of thwarting an organized (possibly by governments) criminal effort to ferret interesting packets and to perform a brute-force attack to find the key, you'll find a huge consensus saying the key size is insufficient and within the resources of a person or organization determined to use this computing power in the hope of developing an industry to broker valuable information obtained by cracking encrypted messages.
If you don't believe me, then I invite you to sit in on a group where you pose the question, "Please comment/remark on the value of a protocol like SSL in the enhancement of net security, or whether merchants should be released from legal liability if they can say they made bona fide attempt to protect sensitive information through the use of tools like SSL."
Then hold tight.
--Mavi Gozler
(To reply, click here.)
(2/14)
As an accountant for an online merchant I feel like I am on the front lines of this new battle with credit card criminals. We are having to review our company policies regarding credit card purchases on a daily basis. Unfortunately, the criminals seem to be one step ahead of us sometimes. We follow the guidelines given to us by our Merchant Services for accepting credit cards as payment. However, we have still been hit by several fraudulent charges and learned some hard lessons. We require from our customers a signed Purchase Order and a copy of the front and back of the credit card for all purchases over a certain dollar amount. This seems to eliminate those who try to purchase with credit card numbers that they simply stole from the Internet somewhere.
-- e-commerce merchant
(To reply, click here.)
I had to learn the hard way. Never shop at a vendor who ships to a different address than the billing address. This includes big places like Amazon.com and others. Boycott these vendors. You can add a secondary shipping address to your credit card if need be, but you control that, not the online vendor. Never use a debit card – if thieves get a hold of that number the money is coming right out of your account rather than a credit charge you can dispute. Online swindlers like to charge small amounts (not that small -- in the $200-400 range), hoping some people won't notice. If you order online, check your statement carefully.
--Glen Roebuck
(To reply, click here.)
The people who are afraid to shop on the Internet are the same ones who give their credit card to a waiter or waitress, who disappears with it for 5-15 minutes. The same person who hands it to a bartender to keep all night to run a tab, behind a bar with hundreds of people who can see it. The same people who throw away store receipts after they purchase something in a mall with a credit card. Wake up, people, there are a lot more unsafe places to use your credit cards than the Internet.
--Phillip Bunton
(To reply, click here.)
Re: online companies worrying about offending legit customers occasionally. I would not be offended if I were the customer just as I am never impatient or offended when I am asked for my picture ID in a physical store. These people are on my side and are protecting my interests, identity and privacy. Give them a break!
--Frances
(To reply, click here.)
Dear Frances,
Sadly, the experience online is quite a bit different from a physical store. Instead of being asked for your ID, you're simply rejected out of hand without even being told why. And calling your bank won't make a difference--the factors that contributed to your rejection by the fraud screening method are beyond its control. I know from experience that our customers are insulted when they are refused even though they are using a valid card with plenty of credit.
--Bill Barnes
(To reply, click here.)
(2/15)