
In the Biblical SenseA guide to the booming Christian sex-advice industry.
Posted Tuesday, Nov. 30, 1999, at 3:30 AM ET
When University of Chicago researchers set out to discover which religious denominations have the best sex, they learned that the faithful don't do all their shouting in church. Conservative Protestant women, their 1994 survey found, report by far the most orgasms: Thirty-two percent say they achieve orgasm every time they make love. Mainline Protestants and Catholics lagged five points behind. Those with no religious affiliation were at 22 percent. (Unitarians may not wish to read any further.)
What are the Phyllis Schlaflys of the world--those twice-born PTA moms--doing in bed that the agnostics and unbelievers are not? Education may explain some of their sexual satisfaction. (Click here for how.) But they also may be getting better sex advice. Thanks to evangelism's surge during the past quarter-century, America is in a golden age for Christian sex manuals. Evangelicals may not want their children to study sex ed in school, but they are not afraid of studying a little sex ed in their bedrooms.
The modern Christian sex advice business dates to 1973, when the evangelical Marabel Morgan achieved brief notoriety for The Total Woman. Morgan famously suggested that wives spice up their marriage by greeting their husbands at the door wearing nothing but Saran Wrap--a seduction attempted with sad consequences for Kathy Bates in the movie Fried Green Tomatoes. James Dobson, founder of the evangelical group Focus on the Family, published a sex-and-marriage book in 1975. Best-selling Christian authors Tim and Beverly LaHaye followed in 1976 (also the year of Helen Wessel's The Joy of Natural Childbirth, which taught Lamaze from a Christian perspective). Scores of books have followed, selling millions of copies.
While the Marabel Morgan book aimed chiefly to comfort and instruct the wife on holding the attention of her husband--implying without subtlety that any sexual problems were her fault--later writers have expanded the boundaries of the field, which is now marketed as "family counseling," a category that includes child-rearing, lovemaking, marital relations and, of course, sexual orientation. Today, the genre has even subdivided into niche markets. Teens can buy I Kissed Dating Goodbye, by Joshua Harris, which counsels against early sexual experience. Earl Johnson's Single Life: Being Your Best for God as He Prepares His Best for You assures black women that their single status, which demographics may brutally enforce, can be "a celebration rather than a burden." Numerous books target gays for "recovery," including Coming Out of Homosexuality, by Bob Davies, dean of the ex-gay evangelists.
Sex-and-marriage guides are the best sellers of the genre, and Tim LaHaye has emerged as its Alex Comfort. If you're a Christian who wants to go forth and multiply, he's your guide. Lately on the best-seller lists for the six apocalyptic novels in his "Left Behind" series, which have sold nearly 10 million copies, LaHaye has long been a household name among fundamentalists for his works on sexual and family life. His most famous book, the wonderfully titled How To Be Happy Though Married, hearkens back to another era, in ways both quaint and disturbing. LaHaye rehashes all the conventional ideas about male and female sexuality. For example, he perpetuates the Freudian myth about vaginal vs. clitoral orgasms, and he views male sexuality as essentially dangerous. "The sex drive in a man is almost volcanic in its latent ability to erupt at the slightest provocation." Men are stimulated by sight, says LaHaye, women by words and touch. In the LaHaye scheme, the New Testament is a sexual guide. Matthew 5:28, for instance, says, "But I say unto you, that whosoever look unto a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." But Jesus made no such statement about women because most women do not look at men with lust. Thus man "should be the initiator because of [his] stronger sex drive," while "the role of the woman is to respond."
LaHaye's books have their share of quackery and pseudoscience, but that does not preclude some genuinely wise counsel to lovers--especially inexperienced ones. He is wonderfully clear and clinical about the mechanics of sex. Here is part of his description of female sexual arousal, for example: "When a woman is sexually aroused, several of her glands begin to secrete a lubrication that bathes the vulva area with a slippery mucous, easing the entrance of the penis into the vagina." For young marrieds who have grown up shielded from the universal sex talk of the secular world, these details are surely useful.
Perhaps the most notable quality of the Christian sex business is that it is evangelical, not puritanical. It is very pro-sex--as long as sex takes place in the context of marriage. Ed and Gaye Wheat, authors of Intended for Pleasure: Sex Technique and Sexual Fulfillment in Christian Marriage, may curiously advise "taking an acid or alkaline douche just before intercourse" to select the sex of one's baby (they don't say which douche is for which sex), but their overall tone is both practical and sensual. They note that lubricant works best if you first "warm the K-Y Jelly by holding the tube in warm, running water." They advise that newlyweds should "not get a TV set for at least one year" and that "every master bedroom needs a good lock." The Wheats and LaHaye offer finely wrought anatomical diagrams, exhortations to married couples to communicate, reminders to "observe daily hygiene habits," and constant refrains about making sure to satisfy your partner. Bob Davies allows that masturbation is biblically permissible. The Wheats condemn oral sex and vibrators only because they might be too fun, thus souring couples on intercourse. The writers do not invoke the language of sin.
Christian sex counselors are most alienating to worldly audiences when they talk about masculinity and homosexuality. They are obsessed with manliness and have a narrow idea of what that means. Self-styled natural law theologian Anthony Moccia writes in Happily Ever After: How To Stay Married and Be Happy Too! that "a husband has more of a chance to keep his marriage together if he is rough and abusive but assertive than if he is kind and considerate but submissive." (Moccia's greatest professional qualification, according to the jacket flap, is an appearance on the Morton Downey Jr. Show.) Moccia's tone is atypically harsh, but his message is shared by other counselors. Noted preacher T.D. Jakes, who presides over a Dallas-based empire of books, tapes, and TV shows, wants to "heal" not just homosexuals, but all "men who are feminine in their mannerisms." These Christian sex writers contend unequivocally that gays can simply turn straight through faith and willpower. They generally describe gays with crude stereotypes. In What Everyone Should Know About Homosexuality, LaHaye employs Galen's theory of the four humors to help explain gayness. "It has been my observation," LaHaye writes, "that most homosexuals reflect a high degree of Melancholy temperament"--"sensitive, artistic, gifted."
The Christian love doctors believe, against all evidence, that teen-agers can squelch their hormones and homosexuals their essences. Still, for the tens of millions of married couples who just need a little cheerleading--or a detailed diagram--their books may literally be a godsend. LaHaye's advice, from the most florid talk of "eruptive" and "electrifying" touches to his prim injunction to "refrain from the use of back-alley words" during coitus, won't please everybody. But with more than 2 million copies sold, he's one evangelist who is spreading the good news.
Most Fast Food Restaurants Thrived During the Recession. Not Arby's.
Did Anti-Communists Really End Communism? Two Historians Say No.
Dear Farhad: How Does Facebook Know I'm Gay?
What Ever Happened to Hood Ornaments?
Are Doctors Allowed To Say They're Sorry?
Hitchens: Let's Not Get Sentimental About Communism












The readers respond:
If you read the scriptures it seems the original intent was extremely intimate (Mark Ch. 10):
6
"But at the beginning of creation God `made them male and female.' [1]
7
`For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, [2]
8
and the two will become one flesh.' [3] So they are no longer two, but one.
9
Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate."
WOW! Now that's intimacy! Unfortunately the preceding verses 4 and 5 apply even more today.
--Geoff
(To reply, click here.)
I found the article interesting but was rather disgusted by the writer's obvious contempt for Christianity. The overall gist of the article was that the books were basically a surprisingly good source of sexual advice. This was almost overshadowed by the writer's obvious opinion that the authors and their audience were ignorant dolts and that Christianity was a subject of ridicule. If you are going to address Christian topics you should find a writer that can be neutral or at least stifle his personal prejudice against Christianity.
--stever
(To reply, click here.)
One reason why "liberated" people have so much problem with sex is that they expect too much from sex, themselves, each other, etc. Also, sex involving people who do not know or trust each other is not a very appealing thing.
On a darker note, could some of the "conservatives" be reporting what is supposed to happen instead of what actually happens, since they are so heavily propagandized that there is something wrong with them if they are not "normal."
--JG
(To reply, click here.)
So, what might be Mr. Oppenheimer's bias? Namely that there is no God, that we are the products of purely natural evolutionary processes, that we are victims of our natures and ought not do anything about destructive behavior, that humans are only animals. The evidence Mr. Oppenheimer alludes to is really not evidence at all. It is an interpretation of data rather than any presentation of data for objective analysis.
Mr. Oppenheimer concludes that Evangelical Christians are having better sex because of better education. No doubt there is some truth in that. But, could it not be that the most important issue Evangelical Christians learn from these books is not sexual technique but rather how wonderful it is to do a right thing in a right way?
--Roger Oliver
(To reply, click here.)
Oppenheimer's item on Christian sexual advise includes a footnote reference that seeks to explain Evangelical's greater sexual satisfaction in terms of lower education levels. The quote is from the Kinsey study. We know now that most of Kinsey's subjects were jailed perverts, that he loaded the data to prove his hypothesis, that he appears to have been a pervert himself.
--Roger Oliver
(To reply, click here.)
Jesus gave Christians a choice. If you want to be a eunuch, be one. If you don't, then don't. Paul only tried to impress how hard it will be if you minister to all the people and are married at the same time. The duties to a wife surpass that of ministering to the ones who did not know the gospel.
--Sarah
(To reply, click here.)
Paul was celibate because he chose to be. Jesus was celibate because he was the Son of God. Paul told those who could be celibate to do so; remainder to wed. Most Christians choose the marital state for better or worse. Christianity does not command anyone to be celibate; just faithful and to love one another.
--Jerry McDaniel
(To reply, click here.)
Just a comment on the article. I happen to be a Christian woman and I don't know about anyone else but I love sex with my husband, and we have been married almost 6 years and we have sex almost everyday. It is very liberating to know God created sex to be pleasing but in the confines of marriage, one man and one woman.
Thank God for sex!!!
--Delores Alexander
(To reply, click here.)
(11/30)