dialogues
columns
- Oscars 2008
The mystery of Rebecca Miller's dress is solved!
Kim Masters
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Oscars 2008
E-mail debates of newsworthy topics.
Troy Patterson
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Let Us Leave Our Musical Islands
Two critics discuss the state of classical, jazz, and pop.
Ben Ratliff
posted Nov. 7, 2007 - Debating The Year of Living Biblically
Exercising the God muscle.
A.J. Jacobs
posted Oct. 18, 2007 - Debating God's Harvard
A Patrick Henry College grad weighs in.
David Kuo
posted Sept. 20, 2007 - Search for more dialogues articles
- Subscribe to the dialogues RSS feed
- View our complete dialogues archive
Linda Tripp: Victimized or Vicious?
to: Margaret CarlsonPosted Wednesday, July 1, 1998, at 3:30 AM ET
Dear Margaret,
Since it was my suggestion to have this dialogue in the first place, I suppose it's only fair I begin. I would like to make it clear that neither am I Linda's spokesman nor do I represent her in any other professional capacity. But as a matter of full disclosure, I should let it be known that my mom did represent Linda Tripp as her book agent at one point and that she and I are her friends. Also, my mom and I have heard Linda's side of the story, and we have listened to about four hours of the vaunted Tripp-Lewinsky tapes.
Now, with all that out of the way, the question before us is "Linda Tripp: Victimized or Vicious?" I have you at a disadvantage, because I simply know firsthand that Linda is not vicious. But the question of whether she was right or wrong in her actions is obviously open to debate. So let us draw the line. You side with the teeming masses of Clinton-watchers who--having witnessed the dozens of lives Bill Clinton has ruined, the rivers of lies he's told, the mountains of promises he's broken, the rafts of laws and ethics he's violated--have reached the inescapable conclusion that someone other than Clinton must be to blame for his troubles.
I, on the other hand, believe Linda belongs in the legions of little people whose lives have been thrown into chaos by a president and a presidency with a utilitarian understanding of inconvenient people. I concede Linda has been inconvenient for Clinton and most assuredly for Monica Lewinsky.
Edmund Burke noted that "power gradually extirpates from the mind every human and gentle virtue." Alas, things were less than gradual when the Clintons came into power. At the outset of this administration, they determined it would be helpful in some small way to replace the employees of the White House Travel Office. These apolitical public servants were given two hours to leave the premises before being escorted from the White House in a van with no seats. Billy Dale, the 32-year veteran director of the travel office, was fraudulently charged with criminal embezzlement in order to provide cover. Also, the two dozen little old ladies who answered presidential mail, as well as all the White House operators, were canned with only slightly more consideration. Linda knew and liked these people. Now, imagine if a beloved retirement-age co-worker of yours were fired without cause, snatching his last glimpse of his office while sitting on the wheel rim of a municipal van. Imagine that your new boss bragged to the national press about doing all this. Imagine that in order to provide that extra veneer of righteousness, your boss trumped up false criminal charges against your former colleague. Imagine that he did all this to mask the stench of his cronyism. I don't know about you, but I would take note that when it came to the little people, life could be short, cruel, nasty, and brutish in the Clinton White House.
Linda began taping her conversations with Monica, partly at my mother's suggestion, because she did not think this White House would hesitate to destroy her if she chose not to go along with Monica's--officially endorsed--entreaties to lie under oath. Her thinking in this regard was abetted by the fact that the president's lawyer, Bob Bennett, had already called her a liar for telling what she knew about Kathleen Willey.
I concede it is a betrayal of friendship to tape-record a friend's confidences. We will have to put off until next time the question of whether that is a greater betrayal than a Beverly Hills doctor's daughter asking a single mom of two to commit perjury in order to protect the president's adulterous affair.
to: Margaret CarlsonPosted Wednesday, July 1, 1998, at 3:30 AM ET
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: The Twenty Top-Most Books In Print At Present
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: The Surgeon General Has Added Snuff To Tobacco Pyramid
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: A Puzzle For The Mind
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Over the LineHarold Ford Jr. | I know what it's like to be smeared by your opponent.
: The Positive in Negative Ads
- Robinson: A Little Worried About the Meltdown
- Khaled Hosseini: Sen. McCain, Am I a Pariah?
- Ombudsman: A Puff Piece About the Obamas?
- King: The Anatomy of an Assault
- Today's Headlines
- Cars: GM-Chrysler Merger Would Be A Lemon
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:51:58 GMT - Laramie Resident Reflects On Shepard Anniversary
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:11:55 GMT - Zakaria: A More Disciplined America
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:00:21 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- An Obama-Palin Ticket
Thu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMT - Love the Player, Hate the GM
Thu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMT - Schooling McCain on the Man Code
Thu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT - » More from The Root

dialogues













