dialogues
columns
- Oscars 2008
The mystery of Rebecca Miller's dress is solved!
Kim Masters
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Oscars 2008
E-mail debates of newsworthy topics.
Troy Patterson
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Let Us Leave Our Musical Islands
Two critics discuss the state of classical, jazz, and pop.
Ben Ratliff
posted Nov. 7, 2007 - Debating The Year of Living Biblically
Exercising the God muscle.
A.J. Jacobs
posted Oct. 18, 2007 - Debating God's Harvard
A Patrick Henry College grad weighs in.
David Kuo
posted Sept. 20, 2007 - Search for more dialogues articles
- Subscribe to the dialogues RSS feed
- View our complete dialogues archive
The War on Cars
to: James Q. WilsonPosted Tuesday, Feb. 17, 1998, at 3:30 AM ET
Your assertion that "by car you can escape ugliness" reveals the severe limitations of your view. Our use of cars, our willingness to subordinate all other values in civic design to the needs of cars, has in itself generated ugliness of the everyday environment unsurpassed among the supposedly advanced nations.
You imply that population density is responsible for the ugliness of America's townscape. This is a common fallacy. In fact, a viable scale and quality of urbanism cannot be achieved without higher residential densities than are currently permitted under most American land-use codes. It is the lack of density and our consequent car dependency that makes American cities so lifeless and sterile. Holland has population densities second only to Bangladesh, and anyone who has been to Amsterdam cannot fail to identify it as one of the world's most enchanting cities.
It is the excessive population of cars, not people, that makes American city life so uniformly dispiriting. You cite Phoenix as a successful example of a city. This is astounding. Do you know that it is commonly referred to (by people who live there) as "L.A. without the charm"? I was there a month ago. It is a wilderness of sodium-vapor lamps and parking lots. It is hard to imagine a less rewarding urban form. It may be surrounded by interesting mountains, but I would remind you that scenery is not the equivalent of civic life or an adequate substitute for it. To cite Kansas City as a successful urban construct is also absurd. In fact, Kansas City exhibits some of the highest rates of auto-dependency in the world in terms of miles driven per day per resident.
Your view of railroads as the chief generators of contemporary urban squalor is also not borne out by the facts of life in the United States and abroad. Three weeks ago, I took the RER train from Charles de Gaulle Airport to the heart of Paris. The trip took less than 30 minutes, and I was then happily walking down the richly rewarding rue des Abbesses in Montmartre, past handsome, well-maintained buildings; shop fronts full of sensual delight; on sidewalks full of well-behaved, healthy-looking people going about their business on foot. I had similar experiences in Rome last November (where the train likewise goes directly from the airport to the heart of the city), and Berlin in July (ditto). (By the way, Berlin, which was bombed to rubble 50 years ago and then suffered the indignity of division, is today in visibly much better shape than a score of comparably sized American cities.)
A week after I left Paris in January, I had the misfortune of attending a conference at a hotel in San Diego. The hotel was sited in its own "resort pod" miles from the shops, cafes, and other civic equipment of San Diego. The only way to get to any of these things was by a $20 cab ride. For practical purposes, I was marooned there for two days.
Baltimore is dead at its center. Camden Yards may be a nice ballpark, but city planners have failed utterly, so far, to connect it meaningfully with any other urban fabric. The nearby convention center features immense blank masonry walls that make the adjoining streets absolutely without interest for a casual visitor. The residential neighborhoods are notorious slums and I understand that the city shows some of the highest per-capita drug use in the nation. This is due largely to the fact that the middle class and even the rich have abandoned the city in order to live in a cartoon version of the countryside, i.e., the suburbs.
to: James Q. WilsonPosted Tuesday, Feb. 17, 1998, at 3:30 AM ET
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400 - Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400 - Novak Hits Pedestrian With Corvette
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:45 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Let the Oil Deals FlowRaad Alkadiri | Congress should not interfere in the oil industry's contract negotiations with the Iraqi government.
- Ronald Kessler: Happy 100th Birthday, FBI!
- Binder & Evans: How to Teach Evolution
- Colbert I. King: More D.C. Incompetence
- Today's Headlines
- Poll: Hispanic Voters Back Obama by Wide Margins
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:26 GMT - Opinion: Germans See Themselves in Obama
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:52 GMT - How the Mosley Orgy Ruling Could Affect U.K. Media
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:59 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT - The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT - Go for the Bronze
Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT - » More from The Root

dialogues









