dialogues
columns
- Oscars 2008
The mystery of Rebecca Miller's dress is solved!
Kim Masters
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Oscars 2008
E-mail debates of newsworthy topics.
Troy Patterson
posted Feb. 25, 2008 - Let Us Leave Our Musical Islands
Two critics discuss the state of classical, jazz, and pop.
Ben Ratliff
posted Nov. 7, 2007 - Debating The Year of Living Biblically
Exercising the God muscle.
A.J. Jacobs
posted Oct. 18, 2007 - Debating God's Harvard
A Patrick Henry College grad weighs in.
David Kuo
posted Sept. 20, 2007 - Search for more dialogues articles
- Subscribe to the dialogues RSS feed
- View our complete dialogues archive
Who's the Real Economist?
to: Paul KrugmanPosted Thursday, Nov. 7, 1996, at 3:30 AM ET
Clearly, Paul Krugman's response narrows our differences. I do not criticize him for the simplicity and elegance of his math; my linear algebra is not fancy either. We agree that journalists should be careful with numbers. And while I'm quite certain that my own work also contains mistakes, it is gratifying that so far, Paul hasn't found them. His reply also does not repeat the canards about "deconstruction," "anti-academic writers," "lit-crit style," and "intellectuals who can't stand algebra" of his original attack.
Paul's own past work is probably not available online, so readers may have to go to the library to check whether there isn't, after all, just a hint of that Ricardian vice on his record. Readers should also stay tuned on the great questions of trade and wages that are the subject of the rest of Paul's letter. The real issue here, still very much unresolved between academics, is not the division of income between wages and profits. It is the effect of trade on inequality within the wage structure. It is whether trade has displaced relatively low-wage manufacturing jobs, not high-wage jobs. My present view is that the actual effects of trade on wage inequality are stronger than Paul appears to believe, that they worked mainly through the exchange rate, and that they are, nevertheless, not as strong as the influence of high rates of domestic unemployment. For more details, however, readers will just have to wait--I'm still checking the numbers.
to: Paul KrugmanPosted Thursday, Nov. 7, 1996, at 3:30 AM ET
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Bigfoot Corpse A Fraud
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:09:19 -0400 - Netherlands Taught How To Play Softball Seconds Before Being Shoved Onto Field Against U.S. Team
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:00:48 -0400 - Michael Phelps Returns To His Tank At Sea World
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:00:46 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Tom Toles | John McCain likes to tell a story about the foundation of his political faith.
- Broder: A Bellwether Town's Forecast
- Meyerson: Assembling an Obama Nation
- Froomkin: A Reversal for the White House?
- Editorial: The Bush Administration's Silence
- Today's Headlines
- Readers Fend Off a Croc Assault
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:23:53 GMT - Kaplan: The New On-Campus Environmentalism
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:52:30 GMT - Kaplan: Are We Educating Enough Engineers?
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:50:05 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Remembering Stephanie
Thu, 21 August 2008 16:43:07 GMT - A Dying Breed
Thu, 21 August 2008 15:17:14 GMT - TV One-Dimensional
Wed, 20 August 2008 20:31:50 GMT - » More from The Root

dialogues













