
Sarah's Book ClubSarah Palin talks about Going Rogue with Oprah.
Updated Monday, Nov. 16, 2009, at 8:37 PM ET
Sarah Palin has always enjoyed complaining about the "media filter." But that was before she met Oprah Winfrey.
Palin's appearance on Oprah on Monday afternoon, the first big interview on the tour for her book Going Rogue: An American Life, is not likely to relaunch Palin's career. It will take more than a single sit-down, no matter how successful, to change the minds of the six in 10 Americans who think she's unqualified to be president. The Oprah appearance did, however, play to Palin's strengths in a way that no major interview has, save her occasional T-ball practice session with Sean Hannity.
Most of Palin's flubs during the 2008 campaign resulted from a lack of preparation. She stumbled on Katie Couric's question about Supreme Court cases because she simply wasn't expecting it. She couldn't name any publications she read because she was shocked, she says, by the condescension of the question. When she said she was disappointed the McCain camp was pulling out of Michigan, it was because she hadn't been briefed on the campaign's official response. When handed a great script—at the Republican National Convention, for example—she killed.
This time, the interview was on Palin's terms. Oprah did stray from the Palin-approved script here and there, peppering the former governor with questions about her abrupt resignation and Levi Johnston and possible presidential ambitions. But the interview was fundamentally about Palin's book. These were questions she has had plenty of time to mull.
As a result, the interview, like her book, felt like a methodical refutation of her critics. You thought Palin doesn't read much? "Obviously … I am a lover of books and magazines," she said. (As if to prove it, her book name checks C.S. Lewis, National Geographic, Ogden Nash, Animal Farm, Sports Illustrated, and John Steinbeck—all within the first 30 pages.) You thought she hated Levi? Not at all; she's just very sad for him. You heard that she had seriously thought about aborting Trig, her child with Down syndrome? No, she'd merely considered the possibility that other women might do something like that.
Palin gave some of the most cogent answers of her short life on the national stage. Why didn't she just tell Katie Couric what newspapers she read? Could she really not think of any? "No, it was more like, are you kidding me?" says Palin. "Are you really asking me? To me, it was in the context of, Do you read? How do you stay informed? You're way up there. It seems like she was discovering some nomadic tribe, this member of a tribe from some Neanderthal cave in Alaska, asking me how do you stay in touch with the real world."
Other answers were clear—you could understand what she was saying—but the underlying ideas were not. Palin has yet to come up with a convincing story for why she quit her job as governor of Alaska in June, with two years to go in her term. "I came back from those 10 weeks on the road to a new normal in Alaska," she explained to Oprah. "Everything had so changed from my administration. There were so many opposition researchers up there" that she felt her presence was "hampering" the state rather than helping it. "I wasn't able to get up there and talk about issues that were important to me, or an ethics violation would be filed."
If victimization is a common tool in the Palin tool kit—she gave a special shout out to "the haters and the critics"—so is the noncriticism criticism. When Oprah brought up Levi Johnston, who has said some "unflattering things" (Oprah's words) about the governor, Palin lurched in two directions at once: "I don't think a national television show is the place to discuss some of the things he's doing and saying," she said, before doing just that: "And by the way, I don't know if we call him Levi. I hear he goes by the name Ricky Hollywood now. So if that's the case, we don't want to mess up the gig he's got going, kind of this aspiring—aspiring—porn, some of the things that he's doing. … It's a bit heartbreaking to see the road he's on right now." Oprah asked if he spends time with his baby, Tripp. "He's quite busy with his media tours, and he hasn't seen the baby for a while," Palin responded. "But we will let that be the discussion between Bristol and Levi as they work out their relationship." Yes, we will.
For her part, Oprah avoided going into full Oprah mode. She didn't start every question with "How did you feel when …" It was more like every fourth question. But because she's Oprah, she can ask questions that would elicit scoffs in other contexts, like whether Palin could have handled being a mother of five and a vice president at the same time. "It's a fair question," Oprah said, given that in the vast majority of cases, the burden of raising children falls disproportionately on the mother. (Palin said she would have relied on her "support network.") She also pushed Palin back on track when she sensed a dodge. At one point, she got a reluctant Palin to issue an "open invitation for Levi to come to Aunt Katie's house for Thanksgiving dinner in Washington. There!" She also corrected Palin when Palin suggested that reporters honored Obama's request not to write about his children but didn't honor hers. In fact, Oprah pointed out, it was in the context of a question about Palin's children that Obama had declared kids off-limits.
Oprah closed the interview by asking whether it was true that Palin might be getting her own talk show. Instead of an answer, Palin reached for the butter. "Oprah, you're the queen," Palin said. "You have nothing to worry about." That may be so. But for Palin, a talk show would be a best-case scenario: Top billing. Pre-set conversation topics. A favorable audience. And once and for all, a media filter of her own.
The Tiger-Obama Cover Golf Digest Wishes It Could Unprint
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Trial Will Be Fair Enough
AOL's Plan To Flood the Web With Idiotic Celebrity Content
Amazing Photos of Obama's Secret Service Agents at Work
If You Want To Fix Darfur, Fix Chad First
A Close Reading of the Victoria's Secret Christmas Catalog












Remember that time at the bar, when you got in an argument, and were handed your butt by the less drunk, more articulate guy? Remember all the perfect zingers and rejoinders you came up with the next day? Wouldn't it be cool if you could go on Oprah and toss them all out there on national TV? Sarah just got that chance. It's actually pretty easy to win a debate a year later when the other guy isn't in the room to make you look stupid again.
-- vincent1963
(To reply, click here)
Palin will always play the victim. Palin's reaction to the question about what she reads is typical of her tendency to play the victim. The question is standard in puff interviews like Couric was doing. It isn't designed to trip up the interviewee, but rather to give them a moment to puff up the media outlets they enjoy, find informative, or want the viewers to read.
Newsweek was good enough to promote Palin's book on its cover this week, but Palin feels the need to play the victim and complain about the photograph they used. Conveniently, she gets to play the sexism card while also raking in the benefit of the exposure.
-- fletc3her
(To reply, click here)
Palin is another poser in a long line of people short on talent and substance and long on narcissism. . She wants to be in the spotlight except when the spotlight examines her motives for being there. She is the singer who can't sing but has a great backup band, the golfer with the yips, the novelist who doesn't write her own book. She is like one of those attractive young women who holds up a product and smiles and THAT is supposed to be why we should buy it.
But there is nothing in Palin's hand. She is holding up herself and saying, "Buy me, buy me!"
She gets petulant when she faces criticism because it feels so personal to her. But it is personal because it is all about her that she is out there. She is selling herself - we are supposed to buy her for herself, so should we not examine the product?
She is a spokesperson, that's all. She is a personality for consumption. She is cute. And her bar is so low that her supporters applaud if she can string together a complete thought in a cogent sentence, even if it is not her own thought.
It's not just that we must continually suffer the onslaught of yet another new "celebrity" who has only a modicum of talent that saddens me, it's that so many Americans go for them. It would only be a relatively harmless pabulum if not that sometimes one of them gets into a position of real responsibility, such as GWB.
Sarah Palin is out to make money and fulfill her need for attention. Fine. If you like her, give her your money. But, please, let's not elect her to anything.
-- crowe
(To reply, click here)