Do Wolves Kill for Sport?No, but sometimes they hunt down more than they can eat.
Posted Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009, at 6:55 PM ET
During this fall's inaugural wolf-hunting season in Montana, hunters killed the matriarch of a Yellowstone wolf pack that researchers had been studying for more than a decade. Park officials suspect that her mate and three other pack members were also killed. A Los Angeles Times story about the hunt claims that wolves are known to kill for "pure pleasure." Do wolves really attack their prey just for the fun of it?
No. When they kill more than they can eat in one sitting, the pack usually comes back for second helpings. Wolves achieve a very low yield on hunting expeditions in the wild; somewhere between 4 percent and 8 percent of their attacks are successful. (Lions, by contrast, manage a kill rate of 27 percent or more when they hunt in groups.) Consequently, wolves are opportunistic hunters. If the chance to kill prey en masse presents itself, they have been known to go after more than they can consume. But they're rarely wasteful. Hungry wolves are not above scavenging, and they often return to their kill—or another animals'—days later. They may even bury the leftovers to hide them from competitors such as wolverines. (This is probably how dogs, which are descended from wolves, got into the habit of burying bones.) Of course, no one can say for sure whether wolves derive "pleasure" from a kill.
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponMass kills are rare. Most of a wolf's favorite prey species—ungulates like deer, elk, moose, and caribou—can mortally wound their attackers with one swift kick, so wolves tend to focus on the most vulnerable individuals. It isn't often that a lucky wolf pack happens upon an entire herd of young, sick, or elderly prey. (It does happen, though. When elk transition from winter to spring diets—from woody vegetation to fresh green shoots—they go through a period of weakness and lethargy, which renders them vulnerable to a lupine rout.)
Sheep and cattle, unlike their wild ungulate cousins, lack any kind of defense against wolf attacks. This mismatch can lead to the occasional slaughter, raising outcries from Western ranchers who demand greater measures to prevent wolf attacks. However, wolves only turn to livestock when their natural prey is unavailable, so these killings are infrequent. In 2008, wolves are known to have killed fewer than 200 cattle and sheep in Montana, and 100 wolves were hunted down in response.
Wolves are not alone in displaying an apparent lack of predatory economy. Foxes have been known to kill large numbers of chicken, eating only the head of each victim. (Veterinarians vaccinate foxes against rabies by sprinkling inoculated chicken heads throughout their territory.) Weasels like the back of the head and neck of their avian prey and tend to pile up the uneaten bodies in neat stacks. Raccoons eat the head and the crop.
Dolphins have been observed engaging in the seemingly gratuitous killing of porpoises—going so far as to use sonar to locate the victim's vital organs and increase the lethality of the strike—but experts haven't quite worked out their motivation. Some speculate that the dolphins use the porpoises for target practice, preparing for possible clashes with fellow dolphins who infringe on their territory.
Dogs are the only animal that definitely kills for sport, but that's only because humans taught them to do so. When a farmer finds a few dead chickens killed during the daylight hours with no missing body parts, the neighbor's dog is almost always the culprit.
Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.
Explainer thanks Scott Creel of Montana State University and Tom Talasz of Wolf Song of Alaska. Thanks also to reader Eileen Libby for asking the question.
Is It More Important for Your Turkey To Be Organic or Local?
Why Gift Cards Are a Terrible Gift
Is Sarah Palin's Approval Rating Really as High as Barack Obama's?
Justice Scalia's Most Eccentric Habits
Adam Lambert's Refreshing Non-Apology on the CBS Early Show
Democrats Have a Lot To Be Thankful For
A well-fed house cat will kill song-birds and rodents - and snakes and any other damn thing that moves - like there's no tomorrow. They certainly don't hunt out of hunger - not with Mommy feeding them Super-Duper-Elite-Gourmet Mix cat food from Feline Foodie Mart. You know the stuff - the cost of a week's worth would feed an entire village in Africa for a year, and build them a school as well?
-- JonFrum
(To reply, click here)
I live in the bush in northern Minnesota wolf country. I see their tracks and their scat all the time. The way to differentiate wolf scat from a dog's is the wolf's will be full of fur and bits of bone. Wolves eat everything, including the hide and fur. Wolves don't have freezers, so they will gorge themselves at a kill until they can't eat anymore, and then, over the following days come back to the kill until there's nothing left.
Three weeks ago I hit a deer with my car, which killed it instantly. I dragged the carcass off the road. Wolves, eagles and ravens were on it right away, and three days later there was nothing left except a few tufts of fur.
-- fred schumacher
(To reply, click here)
Wolves are just wild animals. They are canines and act like dogs-except bigger, smarter and more wild. Wolves will kill anything that runs from them, if prey is abundant, they eat their favorite parts and abandon the rest, and wolves do not have a sense of conservation. Wolves can reproduce at a high rate and kill off all the prey in an area. Wolves will outcompete other predators and drive out bears, mountain lions, coyotes, and even small predators like raccoons. Wolves are a prime example of how a fantasy can be created that becomes politically correct, conventional wisdom- wolves are wolves not some mystical shaman in fur. Without management they would kill off all the other animals and then die off themselves. It's not mysticism-it's nature.
-- siempre
(To reply, click here)