HOME / politics: Who's winning, who's losing, and why.

Situation Almost CriticalObama's latest attempt to reshape the health care debate.

President Obama. Click image to expand.In his back-to-school remarks Tuesday, President Obama told America's schoolchildren to pay attention. By Wednesday, when he speaks to a joint session of Congress about health care reform, he hopes the message will have trickled up to their parents. Cutting through the fog surrounding the issue may be the president's biggest challenge of the evening. In a Pew poll taken in early September, 67 percent of Americans say the health care debate remains hard to understand. That's about the same as the 63 percent that said the issue was hard to understand in mid-July.

Despite August's carnival (and sometimes gothic) atmosphere, the president has not lost the public. It increasingly disapproves of his handling of the health care issue, but in general it still supports reform. According to a recent CBS poll, more than 70 percent say the system needs a major change.

As Obama put the final touches on his speech, the president appears to have already achieved one goal. He's spurred the Senate finance committee to quicken its pace. Chairman Max Baucus provided an 18-page framework to the other members of the "Gang of Six" trying to find a bipartisan basis for agreement. Last week, a senior administration official said of the committee's long process of coming to consensus, "If there's a thing in this process that deserves to be called a death panel the [Senate] Finance Committee is it." But this new development has caused a slight reappraisal. Maybe the committee's work might be useful in forging a compromise after all.

The president's aides say he will get specific Wednesday about the areas of common agreement—from insurance reform and regulation to measures for controlling health care's skyrocketing costs. The argument will be simple: We're so close on so much of this, and the public wants it. We can't turn back now.

The more specific the president gets, the better he'll be able to clear up public confusion. The White House hopes that once people hear the facts, they'll start believing that the big changes they say they want won't harm their individual health care. Clarity also helps supporters in search of political cover. If Obama backs it, it's safer for them to back it. When health care reform is associated with Congress, the public has a less-favorable view. Fifty-five percent of Americans say they have either a great deal or fair amount of confidence in the president when it comes to dealing with health reform, about 10 percentage points more than those who say they trust Congress on it, according to a recent Pew poll.

The president has actually been pretty specific, as he argued in a July interview with Karen Tumulty of Time. It's very possible it won't seem like there's much new in his remarks. But even if he repeats himself, he will be repeating himself in a highly charged moment at which people are paying more attention. According to a recent Pew poll, 56 percent of Americans say they plan to watch the speech.

We saw an example of how the old can seem new on Monday when the president spoke to the AFL-CIO. He used his campaign voice, and the speech was heralded for its emotional tone. Obama gave a nearly identical speech, lending the same emotion to the cause and calling out his critics, more than two months ago at a campaign rally for New Jersey Gov. John Corzine. The DNC mailed a clip of it to supporters to fire them up for the August fight.

The question is whether the president will now keep using that same tone not only to rally supporters to the cause but to also warn opponents about the political consequences of doing so.

The mere notion that the president is willing to put the weight of his office and his rhetoric behind the cause is what made Monday's speech so appealing to supporters. It's why they're optimistic when they hear that he's going to get more specific Wednesday. On Monday, he sharpened his remarks about insurance companies "raking in the profits" while denying people coverage. He suggested they benefited from a fundamental unfairness in the current system. This heartened reform proponents, who believe that Obama has to make insurance companies more obvious villains in order to explain the value of reform for those who already have insurance. "Right now the fear of the unknown is trumping the fear of insurance companies," says one strategist involved with a third-party group advocating for reform.

The other key question for supporters is whether the president will really get more specific about his support for an increased government role in health care—the so-called "public option." At the Labor Day rally, after using all of the flashes of campaign style that worked so well in his race against McCain, Obama then said this about his support for a government role in the insurance market: "I continue to believe that public option within the basket of insurance choices would help improve quality and bring down costs." That's a statement of belief, not a commitment of energy.

The debate has reached the point at which Obama needs to "draw lines in the sand," to use one of the official clichés of the 2009 Health Care Reform Debate, because after he leaves the Capitol, Congress will go back to its messy work of making legislation. The president has to be clear enough to avoid having the public debate hijacked by the day-to-day congressional process as it was during June and July. If he merely explains and describes rather than advocates the clear contours of what he supports, he'll merely be drawing pictures in the sand. Those might be pretty, but they don't demand attention.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
John Dickerson is Slate's chief political correspondent and author of On Her Trail. He can be reached at . Follow him on Twitter.
Photograph of President Obama by Jim Watson/Getty Images.
COMMENTS

Obama doesn't know HOW to draw lines in the sand. He's been blathering about his 'vision' of health care for weeks now and NOBODY knows what the heck the man actually wants, and this is because he refuses to traipse into the unknown and scary territory called SPECIFICS.

At least with president Bill Clinton people KNEW precisely what he wanted and why he claimed to want it. He would appear with charts and graphs and sometimes bore people to tears but when he was done they KNEW where he stood and why and could then make informed decisions. Obama? All they hear from Obama is variations of campaign speech rhetoric; heavy on flash and trash and low on meaningful substance.

You EXPECT Obama to change his nature for the speech and get down to specifics on which he can be pinned to the wall? That's NOT going to happen. All he is going to do is blather about meaningless Hope and Change ONE MORE TIME.

I'm quite looking forward to the entertainment value.

-- Gatewood
(To reply,
click here)

It's becoming increasingly clear lately that Obama's closest advisors have drastically misread the political landscape. They see his declining poll numbers and decide to back off the public option, even though, with more than 60% (in most polls) of the country in favor of it, they should be urging him to be more aggressive.

Plus, a joint session of Congress is entirely the wrong place to be selling health care right now. He needs to connect with us and up on the dais is not the place to accomplish that. He should be behind his desk in the Oval, talking to us, rather than at us. Standing up there behind the podium turns him into an abstraction, commanding from on high. That only plays into the hands of the crazies on the right who keep comparing him to a Nazi.

-- RadicalRationalist
(To reply,
click here)

The public doesn't need to be sold. We want health care reform. Obama is going to speak to the ones who need to "get it". Every single member of Congress knows just as well as you and I that health care in this country is a farce, and will remain so as long as insurance and pharma pull the strings. Obama has to shame and bully congress into fulfilling its moral imperative to govern effectively and provide for the general welfare of the nation.

-- vincent1963
(To reply,
click here)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
All that glitters …93/091202_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Afghanistan.55/091202_TC.jpg
Handling the old dude.66/0912102_TD.jpg