
The Making of an Afghan PoliticianAshraf Ghani is an intellectual and a technocrat; after this campaign, he is also a pol.
Posted Wednesday, Aug. 19, 2009, at 2:49 PM ET
JALALABAD, Afghanistan—On Aug. 2, Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai appeared on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS to make his case for the Afghan presidency. His answers were astute and his facts irrefutable, and he seemed more engaged than the other main challenger, Abdullah Abdullah, who spoke from an office in Kabul, wore a suit, and seemed to be trying, with an affect of singular disinterest, to appear modern and refined. Ghani, in all his Afghan plumage, was beamed in "from a tent in Kabul" (Zakaria emphasized tent, as if amused by it), but he looked to me as though he were playing a high-stakes game of dress up. "It's a palace of intrigues," he said of President Hamid Karzai's administration. "All is a game of pretension, and King Lear does not understand that he is being fooled." Shakespeare crossed with the Afghan wardrobe made for a confusing optic, as if Ghani were trying to appeal to eyes in Afghanistan and ears in America—and looking generally uncomfortable in both pursuits.
Ghani is a brilliant intellectual with a mile-long résumé who has done a tremendous amount for Afghanistan's reconstruction since the fall of the Taliban, one of the few who has been able to bridge the gap between ideas and execution. In America, interested parties are, for the most part, smitten with him, but few harbor illusions about his presidential prospects, which are dim, even though he is widely regarded as the best medicine for an ailing country.
Ghani came back to Afghanistan after the fall of the Taliban having co-written a book called Fixing Failed States and having co-founded an institute to study them. His reputation as an academic, technocrat, and reformer is close to sterling, but his international appeal plays to a narrative Afghans are programmed to reject. In a country that has been a stepping stone for empires and a chessboard for foreign interests, politicians with external ties are to be watched closely. On the streets of Kabul, I have variously heard Ghani dismissed as "not Afghan"; "a foreigner"; and, most charitably, "an intellectual, yes, but not presidential." By default, his extended furlough in the West has relegated him to the political purgatory Afghans devise colorful names to describe: Zana-e Bush, literally "Bush's wives"; or sag-shuyan, "dog washers," for the lowly vocations the privileged classes surely filled while overseas. (The latter is an especially insulting slur, because the American pastime of inviting animals into homes and giving them human names is a source of genuine consternation here. "They're unclean," a friend says, "it makes no sense.")
Unlike other exiled politicians who have returned to their native lands and been greeted by welcoming crowds, Ghani wasn't forced out of Afghanistan, so he doesn't have the hero's privilege of a public that either obligingly forgets the reason he left or celebrates it. Ghani's campaign must constantly prove that his loyalties lie with Afghanistan—Afghans expect him to leave if things really heat up. Ghani represents everything Afghanistan needs, but he's also precisely what its people can't stomach. A vote for Ghani is a concession of pride.
This mind-set is particularly pervasive in rural areas where low literacy and uneven media saturation make Ghani hard to explain, and it plays to Karzai's strengths. His Afghan-ness is harder to question, and that's critical to an electorate whose most frequent expression of nationalism is collective resentment for other countries' meddling. Karzai has convinced most of the Afghans I've talked to that he has rebuked the West when they've overstepped their boundaries, but Ghani has no record to prove that he has or will.
The Tiger-Obama Cover Golf Digest Wishes It Could Unprint
Four Reasons The Blind Side Nearly Toppled New Moon
AOL's Plan To Flood the Web With Idiotic Celebrity Content
Amazing Photos of Obama's Secret Service Agents at Work
If You Want To Fix Darfur, Fix Chad First
A Close Reading of the Victoria's Secret Christmas Catalog












***sigh*** The UN's loss... is Afghanistan's gain. If the Bush administration hadn't demanded an ineffectual prat like Ban Ki-Moon as Secretary General, we could all have been benefiting from this charming, capable, intellectual technocrat. He could have been the world's Barack Obama.
For the record, the US vetoed every other candidate, making Ban America's SG. I'm so proud.
-- finkyboy
(To reply, click here)