HOME / tv club: Talking television.

Mad Men, Season 3

Season 3 Preview: Will Don Draper Attend a Sit-in?

Posted Thursday, Aug. 13, 2009, at 5:27 PM ET

Mad Men. Click image to expand.Dear Julia and Patrick,

Break out the chip 'n' dip: The moment we've been waiting for is finally here. In just a few short days, the boys from Sterling Cooper will be back, boozing, smoking, and philandering their way through … 1962? That's where Season 2 left off—in October, to be precise. But nearly two years elapsed between the end of Season 1 and the beginning of Season 2. What if Mad Men maestro Matthew Weiner decides to leapfrog another year or two? What if Season 3 opens in 1964, with Don Draper trying to figure out how to sell Belle Jolie to counterculture chicks by attending a sit-in at Berkeley? It's a testament to the enthusiasm of Mad Men fans—and to the intensity with which its creator guards his secrets—that the year in which this season takes place has become spoiler material.

I can understand why some fans want to be completely in the dark about the coming season, but it's never been Mad Men's plot twists that have kept me coming back for more. Don's twist-rich flashbacks consistently irritate me; indeed, the hokey set piece in Korea, in which Don steals his commanding officer's identity (having just accidently blown him to smithereens), is, for me, a low point. The scenes I love most are ones you can't really spoil. I'm talking about Ken Cosgrove basking in the news that the Atlantic Monthly has published his short story (the perfectly titled "Tapping a Maple on a Cold Vermont Morning"); Paul Kinsey directing his colleagues in an impromptu, drunken staging of his play on election night 1960; Harry Crane, sitting in Don's office in his tighty-whities, describing his fascination with the cave paintings at Lascaux; Roger's oh-so-wrong, yet oh-so-perfect breakup speech to Joan Holloway ("I am so glad I got to roam those hillsides") as she dabs him with foundation to hide his post-coronary pallor from the Lucky Strike people; Don's just-on-the-right-side-of-maudlin Kodak Carousel pitch.

These are all moments from Season 1, which I recently revisited. Maybe I'm just biased, since that season is now freshest in my mind, but I'm hoping the new episodes feel more like Season 1 than Season 2. There were moments last year when Mad Men lost me. I prefer it when the changing times creep up on Don; during his sojourn in California, he was too much a fish out of water, too fast. Much as I adore the way January Jones looks in jodhpurs, I also could have done without the will-she-or-won't-she with that dope from her equitation lessons. And, please, enough with that shifty priest constantly pushing up on Peggy.

Julia, Patrick: Am I being too hard on Season 2? Either of you care to defend the good father, he of the symbolic egg? Or that comely L.A. nymph who takes a shine to Don?

There has been a ton of Mad Men coverage in the last few weeks—for the most part, a basket of very wet kisses—but allow me to recommend one article well worth reading before Sunday night: Bruce Handy's feature in Vanity Fair. It's hardly news that Matthew Weiner is obsessed with getting the period details right, but I'd never quite processed just how obsessed he is. Handy notes that Weiner had his writers research the train schedules in 1960, so when Don says he's taking the 5:31 to Ossining, that means there really was a 5:31 to Ossining that day. And the aforementioned chip'n' dip, the one Pete and Trudy got two of for their wedding? It's an item Weiner's parents received as a gift in 1959.

A final question for my fellow TV Clubbers: If you were an employee of Sterling Cooper, who would you be? And also: If I were an employee of Sterling Cooper, who would I be?

That's it for now, except to say I am very excited for this season and can't think of anyone I'd rather roam these hillsides with than the two of you.

Fondly,
John

Season 3 Preview: Will Don Draper Attend a Sit-in?

Posted Thursday, Aug. 13, 2009, at 5:27 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Patrick Radden Keefe is the author of The Snakehead: An Epic Tale of the Chinatown Underworld and the American Dream, which has just been published. John Swansburg is Slate's culture editor. You can e-mail him at and follow him at www.twitter.com/swansburg. Julia Turner is Slate's deputy editor. You can e-mail her at or follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/juliaturner.
Stills from Mad Men © 2009 American Movie Classics Company LLC. All rights reserved. Stills in entries 65-70 by Carin Baer.
COMMENTS

Series creator Matthew Weiner has stated he leaves nothing for future seasons and puts everything out there each season, like its the last, and this episode could almost double as a series finale. I think when Mad Men eventually ends its run, there will be discussion whether this episode was the proper series finale and should have called it quits right here, or will Weiner have new and interesting places to take us in season 4?

-- guyroy
(To reply,
click here)

"And the way that they saw themselves is gone." Julia, I think this pretty clearly refers to Peggy having her child and giving it away. Until Peggy told Pete about the baby, Don was only person on the show outside of her family and priest that knew her secret. Don was the one that visited Peggy in the hospital after she gave birth and had been out of work for a while.

-- BumblebeeMan
(To reply,
click here)

Who's in charge, Betty or Henry? Something that surprised me was the amount of involvement Henry had in Betty's divorce advice. Does it ring true for the period that Henry went to the lawyer with Betty and apparently also knew the lawyer and may have selected the lawyer for Betty? And, when Betty told Don that she would be consulting with a divorce attorney and Don should too, was she simply parroting Henry's words?

Certainly since Henry's divorced he knows the routine and I can understand him giving Betty the benefit of his experience. Last episode Henry was willing to give Betty the time she needed and he would wait. Now, things are fast-tracked to Reno. I'm sure that it's been hard for Betty to continue to live in the same house with Don who continues to deny Betty's feelings. But, seeing Betty sitting in the lawyer's office on the sofa with Henry, reminded me of Betty sitting on the sofa with Glen last season. Then, when Don confronts Betty about Henry, they seem to be having their first real fight.

Anyway, I wonder if Betty/Henry are the 'lasting love' mentioned in the Roy Orbison song at the end.

-- lkd711
(To reply,
click here)

I think season 4 will include a serious health issue for Don-perhaps lung cancer. Note the cough at the beginning of the last episode. Also the brief scene when Sterling's dog food heiress old flame states that her first husband died of lung cancer, there is a brief cut to Don lighting up another. Thoughts while I write an order for Don to get a screening cat scan.

-- ldbmd
(To reply,
click here)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
DOONESBURY FLASHBACK
TODAY'S VIDEO
Black Friday.12/TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Thanksgiving.69/091125_TC.jpg
Hedley struts his stuff.52/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg