Slate's Dialogue on the Sotomayor Hearings

See Slate's complete coverage of Sonia Sotomayor.

Let me just point out that Judge Sotomayor is very, very good at elaborate nonanswers. Each sounds fresh as spring rain. She's clearly culled from the Greatest Hits of Hearings Past and deployed the "it may come before me in the future" defense as well as the "summarize Youngstown" dodge, plus the "precedent is precedent" duck. She can't answer broad questions (because they are broad) or narrow ones (because they are narrow). This morning was no more revealing than any other morning of any other Supreme Court confirmation hearing in recent years, and to the extent any news was made, it was that Sotomayor is very empathetic and open-minded in those few minutes before she robotically applies the facts to the law. That, and she might be able to persuade her future colleagues to allow cameras into the court someday.

—Dahlia

PRINTDISCUSSE-MAILRSSRECOMMEND...SINGLE PAGE

FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUponCLOSE

PRINTE-MAILRECOMMEND...RSS

FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUponCLOSE

SPONSORED CONTENT

• Slate's Dialogue on the Sotomayor Hearings
  How Sotomayor fits into Obama's definition of bipartisanship.
  Emily Bazelon | July 16, 2009
• The Sotomayor Stopwatch
  How much time she talks vs. how much time the senators talk.
  July 14, 2009
• Making Sense of the Credit Debacle
  Failure to connect the dots.
  Jesse Eisinger | March 4, 2009
• Search for more Dialogues articles
• Subscribe to the Dialogues RSS feed
• View our complete Dialogues archive