HOME / the has-been: Notes from the political sidelines.

Quitters Never WinIn Sarah Palin's GOP, the leaders keep quitting and the troubles don't.

"It may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down [and] plod along," Sarah Palin said Friday, in an attempt to suggest that serving her full term as governor would add to the nation's apathy. "That's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out." Sarah Palin is no quitter. That's why she's quitting.

She's not the only one. For the past six months, about all that Republicans have been doing is resigning. On Friday, Sarah Palin said she was stepping down because "only dead fish 'go with the flow.' " But far from swimming upstream, she's the latest proof that for Republicans in government, the tide is out.

Look at the 2009 toll so far. One 2012 Republican wannabe, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, announced he would not seek re-election next year. One of the top woulda-beens, Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, quit his job to join the Obama administration and left the country and the hemisphere.*

Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter quit the party. Last month, Nevada Sen. John Ensign had to resign his Republican leadership post to spend more time with his sex scandal. South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford resigned as head of the Republican Governors Association. After this week's disastrous AP interview, Sanford soon may have to step down as governor as well. As his Argentine mistress said, you can't "put the genius back in the bottle."

When did the GOP become such a bunch of quitters? What ever happened to the party of Larry Craig and his you'll-never-take-me-from-this-stall-alive spirit?

Some Republican strategists insist that resignation has its virtues. Mary Matalin told the New York Times that Palin's "brilliant" move will free her to camp out alongside Mitt Romney on the campaign trail. Certainly, we can all relish the next two years of watching the Romney and Palin broods go five-on-five across the heartland. But Romney himself is proof that quitting is no way to win. In 2006, he passed up a second term so he could campaign full-time in Iowa and New Hampshire. He lost them both.

The fallacy that successful presidential candidates are too busy to govern dates back to Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, who won the presidency as former governors. Yet neither Carter nor Reagan were quitters. Carter couldn't run for re-election in 1974 because in those days, Georgia governors were limited to one term. Reagan served two full terms as governor of California.

In the last 20 years, perseverers have prospered while quitters withered. Bill Clinton won a fifth term as governor of Arkansas before launching his 1992 campaign. George W. Bush won a second term in Texas two years before running for president in 2000.

Compare that with the dismal track record of strategic quitters. In 1986, Gary Hart chose not to run for a third Senate term and went on to meet Donna Rice. In 2004, John Edwards passed up a second Senate term and went on to meet Rielle Hunter.

Bill Bradley's decision not to seek a fourth term in 1996 helped cost him the Democratic nomination in 2000 to Al Gore, whose slogan was "stand and fight." Bob Dole's spectacular resignation from the Senate after he clinched the Republican nomination in June 1996 earned his campaign a few days of good press. But when his White House bid was over, Dole no longer had the Senate job he had loved.

Time after time, quitting has turned out to be the "worthless, easy path" that Sarah Palin insists it isn't. What makes her sudden resignation especially troubling, though, is not the flawed strategy so much as her jubilation and relief in putting the statehouse in her rear mirror. Palin's resignation is a symptom of what's crippling the Republican Party of late: Governing has become an unwelcome distraction.

Like Sanford's fatal press conference, Palin's bitter statement reads like a cry for help—an all-caps plea for someone to rescue her from the messy business of running Alaska. She passes up running for re-election because she doesn't need a title "to HELP people," then says she'll pack it in altogether rather than "milk" her lame-duck status by traveling to the Lower 48. Like Sanford, Palin snuck away to visit a distant land and fell in love with a siren she cannot bring home or leave behind. Her fatal attraction was the national spotlight.

Palin closed her statement with words she attributed to Gen. Douglas MacArthur: "We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction." Right war, wrong general: The man who said those words was Oliver Smith, who helped his men escape annihilation at the Battle of the "Frozen Chosin" Reservoir in Korea. She should be so lucky. For Sarah Palin, avoiding disaster continues to be a losing battle.

Correction, July 6, 2009: This article originally gave the wrong first name for Utah's governor. He is Jon Huntsman. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Bruce Reed, who was President Clinton's domestic policy adviser, is CEO of the Democratic Leadership Council and co-author with Rahm Emanuel of The Plan: Big Ideas for Change in America. E-mail him at . Read his disclosure here.
COMMENTS

Jon Huntsman accepted the Ambassador to China post when asked by President Obama to do so. Any cursory search will note that with that appointment comes a safer 2012. The reasoning for Huntsman was a winning one for a 2016 run: Country First. The win for Obama is also obvious: 2012. This run involves a politician who won the Governorship for another term by around 80% of the vote. He is the obvious 2016 candidate so we may as well start watching him. He is not going to be easy to dismiss by grouping him into the wall of shame.

Oddly while everyone is watching the circus of the Palin's, Sanford's, and others, Huntsman is being handled by McCain's handlers. It can have the same results McCain ended up with but it is less likely. For a republican in this chaotic time, being out of the country serving your country may just be the best insurance policy. I suspect more than a few would like to get out of the mess a few have made of this party.

Anyone who dismisses Huntsman is not doing themselves a favor. There should be no surprises if we really dig into what a smart move Huntsman's acceptance was.

Take him off the wall of shame. He bears watching.

-- marylb
(To reply,
click here)

Liberals and conservatives should agree that the death of the GOP (at the very least, it's extremely sick) is bad for democracy. Even the most strident liberal must surely see the potential danger in one-party rule. Dems are so overjoyed at their new-found power that they are over-playing their hand. Even the most liberal Americans understand that ultimately the tax revenue for their programs must come from a healthy private sector. In my opinion, the Repubs lost their way when they let the neocons and fundamentalist Christians take over their party. Not only is it too small a base on which to build, but it is contrary to the beliefs of most conservatives, who by nature believe in a small federal government. We need a healthy debate over what the role of Washington is and how we should pay for it. All Americans should be concerned about the lack of intelligent debate in Washington.

-- hestia_m
(To reply,
click here)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
All that glitters …93/091202_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Afghanistan.55/091202_TC.jpg
Handling the old dude.66/0912102_TD.jpg