HOME / explainer: Answers to your questions about the news.

Gov. Sanford Is a Cheater. Is He Also a Criminal?Technically, yes.

By Meredith SimonsPosted Tuesday, June 30, 2009, at 2:51 PM ET

Glenn McCall of the Republican National Committee is organizing a rally in Columbia, S.C., for Wednesday or Thursday to demand that Gov. Mark Sanford resign. After confessing to a yearlong affair with an Argentinean woman last week, Sanford may have lost his moral authority—but did he do anything illegal?

Technically, yes. Extramarital sex is illegal in South Carolina. "Habitual carnal intercourse" with someone other than your spouse is a crime, even if it's committed outside of the Palmetto State. If Sanford were tried and convicted, he could be slapped with a fine of between $100 and $500 and face a year of jail time. But legal experts say there is almost no chance that Sanford will actually be prosecuted, much less locked up. No one in South Carolina has been prosecuted on an adultery charge since 1909.

Sanford's admitted infidelity could, however, become an issue if he or his wife decides to end their marriage. South Carolina usually requires a one-year separation period prior to a divorce. But since adultery is one of the four grounds for fault (the others are desertion, habitual drunkenness, and physical cruelty), the Sanfords could speed through the process. And unlike those in no-fault states (Texas and California, among others), South Carolina courts take infidelity into account when making judgments about the division of assets. Mark will be ineligible for alimony. And Jenny could receive a much greater share of their estate than she would have if Mark's e-mail relationship had never gotten past the Gchat phase.

Explainer thanks Marcia Yablon-Zug of the University of South Carolina School of Law.

Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.

E-MAIL

RECOMMEND... Get Slate RSS Feeds

Meredith Simons is an intern at DoubleX.

COMMENTS

Adultery is a criminal offense in a number of states besides South Carolina, Illinois, for instance. Yes, adultery can be asserted as grounds in a fault-based divorce, but some evidence of it has to be presented. It's much easier to use a non-adulterous spouse's knowledge of the other's adultery as the basis for grounds of "mental cruelty", at least here in Illinois.

-- Illinichief
(To reply, click here)

What about the use of state funds in carrying on this tryst?

Sanford has quickly agreed to reimburse the state for travel monies spent on his jaunts to visit Maria, but since when does a criminal get to reimburse the victim (SC) when he gets caught?

Do liquor store robbers get the same courtesy?

-- northwoods
(To reply, click here)

What did you think of this article?

Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum

POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES