
Periodic DiscussionsElement 112 was discovered more than a decade ago. Why wasn't it given a place on the periodic table until now?
Posted Friday, June 12, 2009, at 3:59 PM ETJon Lackman provided a history of the periodic table in 2005.
Correction, June 15, 2009: The original version switched the order of "Pure" and "Applied" in the full name of IUPAC. (Return to the corrected sentence.)
What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
What Obama Meant—and Didn't Mean—About "Beginning" To Withdraw in July 2011
49 Million Americans Are Hungry. What Can You Do To Help?
Admit It, Dems: These Reform Bills Won't Control Health Care Costs
Parks and Recreation Is Now Better Than 30 Rock and The Office
Lithwick: The Supreme Court's Best Beach-House Case Ever
The Economic Reports About Christmas Shopping Are Confusing, Contradictory, and Useless












I sure don't see a reason for schools to buy new periodic tables. Learning the *useful* elements and their properties should be enough. Any science pedant can draw in a spot on the table for this. It will surely not be used in any experiments the kids do.
-- Bondsman
(To reply, click here)