Strangle With CareDavid Carradine may have died attempting autoerotic asphyxiation. Is there a safe way to do that?
Posted Friday, June 5, 2009, at 6:32 PM ET
Kung Fu star David Carradine was found dead in a Bangkok hotel on Thursday. Police discovered him in a closet with cords tied around his neck and genitals, suggesting that he asphyxiated while engaged in a sex game. Is there a safe, proper way to perform autoerotic asphyxiation?
No. There is no doctor-approved way to strangle yourself while having sex or while masturbating. Indeed, cutting off oxygen to the brain is never a good idea. But there are ways to make this dangerous act slightly less dangerous: Do it with a trusted partner; set up a "safeword," commonly used in bondage situations, to signal your partner to let you go; don't use drugs or alcohol, which could make the strain that much riskier; and, of course, don't tie the belt or rope too tight. Some deaths by asphyxiation occur simply because the victim made escape too difficult—in one case, a man rigged it so he would have needed a bolt cutter to release his chains.
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponAutoerotic asphyxiation, or AEA, is typically performed in the following way: A man—the vast majority of AEAers are male—loops a belt or rope around his neck, attaches the other end to a door knob or pipe, and lowers himself into a controlled suspension. Sex or masturbation ensues. The pressure from the belt cuts off the flow of blood through the veins in his neck, causing blood to congest in the brain. Oxygen levels drop and carbon dioxide levels increase, producing lightheadedness and, for some, intensifying erotic pleasure.
When death occurs, it's usually because of pressure on a part of the neck called the carotid body, a small cluster of chemoreceptors located near the fork of the carotid artery. Pressure on the carotid body causes a discharge from the vagus nerve. This slows down the heart and can make a person pass out instantaneously. (That's why karate chops and the Vulcan nerve pinch target the vagus nerve.) Losing consciousness causes the person to go limp, which tightens the choke and decreases circulation through the neck arteries, causing asphyxiation. Rarely is there enough pressure to block the windpipe—rather, it's the lack of blood flow that causes death.
Can't you just hold your breath? Sure, but that's unlikely to have the same effect. Studies suggest that people who practice AEA do so because of the risk of flirting with death—not just because orgasms without oxygen feel good. (The bodies of AEA victims sometimes have evidence of masochism as well, like cigarette burns or mutilated genitalia.)
The first recorded case of autoerotic asphyxiation was Frantisek Kotzwara, a famous composer from Prague who died in 1791 while having sex with a prostitute. (She was tried for murder and acquitted.) Influential underground cartoonist Vaughn Bodé asphyxiated to death in 1975, according to his son. Stephen Milligan, a member of British Parliament, was found dead in his home in 1994, naked except for a garter belt and women's stockings, strangled by an electrical cord.* In 1997, a coroner called the death of INXS singer Michael Hutchence a suicide, but his girlfriend and some members of his family believed he died from AEA.
Statistics on AEA are hard to come by, since deaths by asphyxiation are often reported as suicide. But the FBI estimates that it accounts for 500 to 1,000 deaths a year. Closely related is the so-called "choking game"—the adolescent practice of strangling yourself or a friend—which caused 65 deaths in 2007.
Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.
Explainer thanks Park Dietz of Park Dietz & Associates.
Clarification, June 11, 2009: This article originally referred to a garter belt by its British term, "suspenders." (Return to the revised sentence.)
Hitchens: The "War on Terrorism" Didn't Cause the Fort Hood Shootings
Enter Slate's Write-Like-Sarah Palin Contest
Whoa! The House Health Care Bill Is Actually Less Expensive Than the Senate's.
Like Israel but Colder: The Jewish Autonomous Region of Russia
Why Everyone Should Read When Everything Changed
Spitzer: How Tim Geithner Was Fleeced by Wall Street
What about the lemon?
Just about every article about AEA mentions that people doing it often have a lemon in their mouth and chomp down on it to bring themselves back to earth so they can untie themselves. It would seem to be a relevant point for this article as well.
-- spackle
(To reply, click here)
Indeed, an at the time much publicized detail of the British MP, Stephen Milligan's death, who is mentioned in this article, was that he was found to have an orange segment in his mouth.
The publicity surrounding his death damaged the Conservative government of the day who were on a 'Back To Basics' family morality drive. His fiancée, Julie Kirkbride, went on to marry another Conservative MP and is now back in the headlines for fiddling her expenses to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds.
-- C-Tips
(To reply, click here)
"Statistics on AEA are hard to come by, since deaths by asphyxiation are often reported as suicide."
Actually, the FBI keeps pretty good records. They have also published a profile to assist local law enforcement in determining whether the death was homicide, suicide or "misadventure". For example, the typical AES practitioner positions himself in front of a mirror or other reflective surface for the act. He is a user of visual pornography which will be found nearby. He may possess/wear women's or silken undergarments. He (and most practitioners are male) is of above average intelligence, well integrated socially, and is usually engaged in a demanding, high skill, high stress profession (pilots, doctors and lawyers abound)
I used the FBI profile in an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals here in NJ to argue that my client died accidentally while engaged in AES and that his estate was therefore eligible for death benefits under his life insurance policy. The typical insurance company argument is that the act was "intentional" and therefore, coverage is denied. This begs the question: If the act was intentional but the result accidental, is an insured entitled to benefits?
Most reported cases come out of Texas and Oklahoma, with California a distant third. I think it reflects jurisdictions where insurers think they have a chance to void coverage rather than a greater local incidence of the behavior. At last look the Circuits are split on the intent/result issue.
-- vertarmis
(To reply, click here)