HOME / technology: The future and what to do about it.

I, for One, Welcome Our New Android OverlordsGoogle's mobile operating system is jumping to the PC. Hallelujah!

By Farhad ManjooPosted Friday, June 5, 2009, at 3:45 PM ET

(Continued from page 1)

RSS

Related in Slate

In 2007, Tim Wu predicted that Android was Google's first step in taking over the wireless world. Farhad Manjoo explained what Google stole from the iPhone. Manjoo also explained what the netbook craze tells us about the future of computing and proclaimed that Windows 7 was superior to Microsoft's usual operating-system fare.

Microsoft promises that Windows 7 will be able to run on netbooks, but it has announced a risky strategy to squeeze profits from these machines. The company plans to cripple the cheapest versions of the new OS in order to encourage PC makers to pay for premium editions. If you buy a netbook that comes with the low-priced Windows 7 Starter Edition, you won't be able to change your screen's background or window colors, you won't be able to play DVDs, you can't connect it to another monitor, and you won't see many of the user-interface advances found in other versions. If you'd like more flexibility, you'll need to upgrade to a more expensive version of Windows—which will, of course, defeat the purpose of your cheap PC. (Microsoft had originally planned to limit Starter Edition even further—you wouldn't be able to run more than three programs at a time. It removed that limitation after howls of protest.)

While Microsoft is setting up barriers for netbook makers, Android is inviting them with open arms. Google offers the OS to anyone at a price even lower than what Microsoft charges for XP: It's free. The first Android-based netbooks aren't scheduled to hit the market until the fall—PC makers Acer, ASUS, Compal, and others have unveiled upcoming Android-based machines—so we'll have to wait to see whether Google's OS will actually run well on something other than a phone. But I've got high hopes; I've found Android to be a delight on the few phones I've tried it on, and by many accounts the experience on computers is similarly enjoyable.

What's more, Android offers a user-interface well-suited to machines with limited power that are constantly online. Unlike Windows, Android will run only programs that you get from a centralized location—Android's App Marketplace, which lists programs that have been deemed safe by Google. This makes your system less susceptible to malware, which is important on a machine that has so little processing power to begin with. Android's got lots of other little touches that are a blast on the go. Like a cell phone, it can stay connected to the Web even when it's in standby mode—it can be busy downloading stuff, for example, even if it's tucked away. It also switches between apps and load new ones very quickly; there's little of the lag one finds on PCs when going between, say, a bloated e-mail program and a bloated Web browser.

What can Microsoft do to blunt the threat of Android? This is not complicated: It needs to make a better mobile OS, and fast. In February, the company released Windows Mobile 6.5, a long-awaited new version of its cell phone operating system—it was immediately panned. While its rivals have been improving their devices at a breakneck pace, Microsoft has failed to add support for a host of features people consider important in modern phones. For instance, Windows Mobile can't support the "capacitive touchscreens" on multi-touch-enabled phones and doesn't include an on-screen keyboard, and its Web browser looks like something you might have used in 1999. Unless Microsoft has a major change in priorities, it'll likely be a year or more before it comes out with mobile phones that can do what Android, the iPhone, and the Pre can do today. By that time, of course, its rivals will be way ahead, and Android in particular will have conquered devices far beyond the humble phone.

Page: 1 | 2SINGLE PAGE

E-MAIL

RECOMMEND... Get Slate RSS Feeds

Farhad Manjoo is Slate's technology columnist and the author of True Enough: Learning To Live in a Post-Fact Society. You can e-mail him at and follow him on Twitter.

Illustration by Rob Donnelly.

COMMENTS

Android sounds great -- if only for the rapid start-up/shut-down.

I've been using a Netbook for some time. The Dell outlet has been selling refurbished models at a price that competes with the newer machines coming on the market, and I find I can carry a 2 pound computer comfortably in place of the laptop that seems determined to affect my spinal curvature. When I ordered it, the very nice order taker suggested that I buy an external drive. I declined. When she asked how I would load programs, I explained that I didn't have to -- Google may be on its way to becoming the next evil empire, but it's sort of a benevolent despot. For my purposes, Google Documents provides all the productivity software I need, and it's easy to transfer files to my primary computer. While I suspect Google is hiding under my bed to extract personal information, one of the disappointments of my life is that I really don't have anything worth keeping secret. Also, Dell has done a nice job of designing a workable keyboard for small computers. The letter keys are full size, but keys like caps lock and shift are reduced to save space.

But -- unlike a full size laptop, which is often used as a desktop replacement, a Netbook has to be turned off and on routinely. If you're on a train or a bus, you do want a computer that can shut down fast enough to let you get off at your stop, and XP doesn't pass that test.

I'm not really concerned about appearance, and don't play games (much) -- but the notion of a Netbook that can turn on and off with the speed of my cell phone is incredibly appealing. Google can have every detail of my browsing and buying behavior -- I'm ready.

-- Sanskara
(To reply, click here)

The irony about Microsoft is that it's spent the past 20 years or more trying to leverage its dominance in small stuff (consumer and corporate desktop OS's and applications) into market share in the big stuff: corporate servers and enterprise software. To some extent, they have succeeded. They seem to have just about put Sun out of business, for example. True, Linux was a large part of that, but Windows seems to have grabbed about half the server market.

But now they're losing their grip on the small stuff!

-- Mmmmmm
(To reply, click here)

What did you think of this article?

Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum

POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES