HOME / politics: Who's winning, who's losing, and why.

U.S. Department of BloggingWhat the rest of the government can learn from the TSA.

By Christopher BeamPosted Thursday, April 9, 2009, at 11:28 PM ET

(Continued from page 1)

RSS

Another thing agency blogs need: actual power. When Evolution of Security commenters complained about having to remove all electronics from carry-on bags during screening in certain airports, the TSA put a stop to it. When they kvetched about long lines, the agency created a new express-lane program. (They don't take all suggestions. One commenter asked TSA to focus more on invisible supernatural terrorists. Another suggested that the agency ban nail clippers on flights so passengers don't get hit with stray clippings.) The direct line from the comments section to the top brass isn't just good business; it also builds goodwill.

Which brings us to a good govblog's other function: damage control. When TSA officials detained a Ron Paul organization official in March for carrying too much cash—he was transporting $4,700 in contributions—the blogosphere went nuts. More embarrassing was a recording of the incident: The man asked whether he was legally obligated to answer questions, to which one TSA official replied, "You want to play smartass, and I'm not going to play your fucking game."

The TSA blog responded with a staid, press release-y item: "The tone and language used by the TSA employee was inappropriate. TSA holds its employees to the highest professional standards. TSA will continue to investigate this matter and take appropriate action." Normally, Burns signs his posts with the jaunty moniker, "Blogger Bob." This time he played it straight: "Bob." "What I wanted to say was a little bit harsher," he told me. "But that's what was approved."

Commenters railed against Burns and the TSA for the limp response. "Bob, will the TSA tell us what the results of the investigation and any actions taken against the employee?" asked one. "Or will this just be swept under the rug?" But at least these complaints were being lodged not with a faceless entity but with a guy they knew and, for the most part, liked: Bob. And because he had spent so much time building trust, many commenters gave him the benefit of the doubt. Said one: "It is unusual these days to here [sic] any organization admit that it, or its employees, did something wrong. TSA's official statement above does exactly that. Kudos to the TSA for having the courage to say so." Burns thus serves as a lightning rod—he attracts criticism, but he also helps ground it.

There's no reason the rest of the government Web sites can't do the same thing. Many agency blogs have comments sections—almost all monitored—but few of them try to create a community. The White House blog tries to be more conversational than its press releases, but the conversation is still one-way. When I asked about creating a comments section for the blog, an administration official pointed to the Open for Questions program, in which the president answers questions in a live streaming town hall. Sure, but that's not the same as a forum that allows users to engage with one another and government officials at the same time.

And if there's one thing the TSA experiment has shown, it's that engagement doesn't sacrifice authority. It enhances it. Obama has made a point of increasing transparency through new media: How about a secretary of blogging?