HOME / the big idea: The thinking behind the news.

The Genius CabinetWhy the president-elect should surround himself with brilliant—albeit prickly, semi-autistic, and egomaniacal—thinkers.

By Jacob WeisbergPosted Saturday, Nov. 15, 2008, at 7:43 AM ET

Here's a radical suggestion: Barack Obama should pick the smartest people he can find for his Cabinet.

RSS

Brilliance has sometimes been a criterion in presidential appointments, of course, but seldom the major one. It usually takes a back seat to rewarding friends and backers, playing congressional politics, seeking diversity, and appeasing industry and interest groups. Presidents also feel obliged to avoid too many retreads and place a high premium on personal loyalty.

Obama can't avoid such considerations, of course. He needs to cultivate his congressional relationships, avoid alienating allies where possible, and rely on people he trusts. President No Drama doesn't want a Cabinet full of undisciplined prima donnas. But it makes sense for Obama to give greater weight to intellectual acumen and subject-specific knowledge than his recent predecessors have, both because of the depth of the problems he faces and because of his own style as a thinker and a decision-maker. Bush, whose ego was threatened by any outburst of excellence in his vicinity, politicized all policymaking and centralized it in the White House. Obama, happily, has the opposite tendencies. He is intellectually confident, enjoys engaging with ideas, and inclines to pragmatism rather than partisanship. He can handle a Lincolnesque "Team of Rivals" or a FDR-style brain trust. And he's going to need one.

The issue starts at the Treasury Department, where the best choice would be former Clinton Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. Summers is the outstanding international economist of his generation, someone whose brilliance is immediately evident in any conversation. I happened to run into him at a dinner in New York a couple of days after Lehman Bros. was allowed to collapse. Summers analyzed the situation, which he said had suddenly become far more dangerous, with a clarity I haven't heard from anyone else since. He explained that it was simultaneously a crisis of liquidity, solvency, and confidence and that the government would ultimately have to inject capital into financial institutions and not just buy up distressed assets. It took Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson another three weeks, a defeat in Congress, and a jump-start from Gordon Brown to find his way to a similar conclusion.

Summers can also be arrogant and politically incorrect. He sometimes does a poor job hiding his contempt for lesser intellects and loves to play the intellectual provocateur. Socially, he can be a bit autistic. But these are the defects of a superior mind, and they are a small price to pay for getting the person most likely to maximize our chances of avoiding a full-scale global depression. To say that Summers is the best person for the job of treasury secretary is no knock on others frequently mentioned, including New York Federal Reserve President Timothy Geithner and New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, both of whom are highly qualified. But if chosen, the first thing either of them would do is call Summers for advice.

It's a similar story at the State Department, where the Great Mentioner has dropped a number of plausible names, including those of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Either would be a good choice, if it didn't mean passing over the person they both get their best foreign policy advice from, Richard Holbrooke. Holbrooke dominates the field like no one else on the Democratic side. He has a quick and supple mind, understands all the issues, knows the leaders, and has a proven record as a diplomat and peacemaker. At Dayton, Holbrooke single-handedly ended the war in Bosnia by sheer force of personality.

Holbrooke has some personal defects, too. He is legendary for his relentless ambition and self-promotion. To say he rubs some people the wrong way puts the proposition mildly—he's a handful. He also backed Hillary Clinton in the primaries. But as with Summers, Holbrooke's flaws hardly rate in the context of the urgent need to rebuild relationships, manage complex security threats, and develop a tough-minded liberal vision of American's role in the world. The president-elect should pick Holbrooke simply because he's the best available player at a hinge moment in history.

The genius principle should also be applied to the lesser agencies, where many of the names being trotted out have a dreary, box-checking quality. Obama says transitioning to renewable sources of energy is his second-highest priority after saving the economy. So why not talk the brilliant, socially awkward Al Gore into taking the job of Energy Secretary? Following the anonymous Samuel W. Bodman might seem like demotion for the former vice president and Nobel Prize winner, but it would give Gore a chance to accomplish his life's mission by addressing climate change (and make up for his neglect of the issue when he was vice president). If the president wants a first-class legal thinker to help him clean up the Justice Department, he can't go wrong with his old Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, his University of Chicago colleague Cass Sunstein, or Stanford law professor Kathleen Sullivan. For Education, he might choose Joel Klein, the chancellor of the New York City school system. Klein has not gone through life making friends, but he has shown himself an unusually shrewd and committed thinker about educational management and reform. Better yet, what about getting Bill Gates to tackle the problem?

Among the intangible tasks Obama faces is vanquishing the anti-intellectualism of the past eight years, the prejudice that serious policy discussion is too effete for the Cabinet Room or the Oval Office. If he really wants to bring change to Washington, the new president should start by putting a sign in his window: No hacks.

E-MAIL

RECOMMEND... Get Slate RSS Feeds

Jacob Weisberg is chairman and editor-in-chief of the Slate Group and author of The Bush Tragedy. Follow him at http://twitter.com/jacobwe.

Illustration by Rob Donnelly.

COMMENTS

This is not a list of geniuses: It is a list of fairly smart misfits.

--Yakubu Kasavubu

(Find this post here)

I'm sorry, but all the best minds aren't white males…I expect more from Barack Obama and I think I will get it. Just wait.

--DallasNE

(Find this post here)

I am a recent graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, and had the privilege of taking many classes from Cass Sunstein.. the thought of this particular genius heading up the Justice Department (or really any job that would require him to manage other people), made me laugh so hard I almost fell off my sofa.

--honour98

(Find this post here)

[Re: Larry Summers] Treasury secretaries and university presidents have quite different jobs. Treasury secretaries have (or should have) real power. For example, they can fire people who work up to several levels under them. People willingly overlook a cabinet secretary's social inadequacies because they need something from him. University presidents, on the other hand, famously have relatively little power. A university president's biggest responsibility is to coax money out of donors; to do that, s/he must have social graces. He must also win over faculty lest they make him/her look like he can't keep order in his own house and thereby harm his fund-raising ability. Faculty, many of whom (at a place like Harvard) have long-cherished outsized images of their own prowess and importance, sense that dependence and are not shy about asserting their prerogatives. And they can't be fired.

Thus, it's quite possible that Summers' social ineptitude could be a serious liability as president of Harvard and not so much as secretary of the treasury.

--Fritz Gerlich

(Find this post here)

I wonder why all the "brilliant" people have to be famous political insiders…there must be some very smart and well-informed citizens who have yet to serve in an administration. And with that I'd like to throw my hat into the ring. I'll even submit to Obama's more stringent vetting process, although a few of the questions will have to be left blank.

–Lid

(Find this post here)

A few more suggestions:

Internal Revenue Service, Director-- Hank Williams, Jr. All his rowdy friends are comin' over tonight and you'd best have your receipts.

Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms--My brother in law, Steve. He has extensive experience with all three simultaneously.

Drug Czar-- Snoop Dogg. Understands the perils presented by the mixing of Tanqueray and chronic. Can speak to the kids.

--bckwtr1

(Finid this post here)

Despite the "no drama" discipline of his campaign, the two year story line of Obama's campaign was intensely dramatic. As he progressed through each impossible hurdle, the political world constantly underestimated him. As he continue to to overperform expectations there were periodic spurts of elation and awe. Speeches, tactics, turns and twists. Could he raise the money on-line? Could he win Iowa? Could he overcome the Clinton machine and the Republican juggernaut? Could he overcome his worst enemies -- his friends?...

But "no drama" is finally coming true. I don't care how hard the media tries, it cannot make a Hillary appointment to Secretary of State match any moment in the last two years. The economy needs fixing but nothing Obama does, whether it works or not, will make America's heart pound with expectation, fear and loathing like each successive victory or setback during the election.

Obama's transition and Presidency is shaping up to be one competent, well planned step after another. Sure he's charismatic, but that doesn't make for excitement. Saving the auto industry or making health care universal will be heartwarming, but frankly, dull. There is nothing more boring than competence. But in my boredom I will be quite happy to take up knitting or something.

--john adkisson

(Find this post here)

(11/18)

What did you think of this article?

Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum

POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES