HOME / press box: Media criticism.

Rahm Emanuel, Press TamerWhat to expect as Clinton's enforcer becomes Obama's chief of staff.

(Continued from page 1)

"On a particular day he might chat up columnists Paul Gigot and Mark Shields, return calls from James Bennet and Todd Purdum at the New York Times, check in with the networks, have lunch with Cokie Roberts," Kurtz writes. "He would often call the network folks at 10:05 a.m., right after their morning conference call with New York, to find out what they were working on and try to shut it down if necessary." NBC Washington Bureau Chief Tim Russert got a couple of calls a week from Emanuel, who would complain about coverage, push a story, or just pester.

Writing in Slate in 1996, Jacob Weisberg described Emanuel as perhaps "the [Clinton] administration's most diabolically effective tactician" and credited him as being "largely responsible for moving the Clinton campaign beyond mere 'rapid response' to pre-emptive strikes—engineering, for instance, Clinton's endorsement by the Fraternal Order of Police on the day Bob Dole was set to launch a major attack on the president's crime record."

Bumiller writes that after Clinton won in 1992, his advisers, including Emanuel, met at Doe's Eat Place to discuss taking revenge on journalists (and others) who had wronged them during the campaign. Even so, Emanuel appears to be a proud member of the "Fuck you—let's go to lunch" school of press management. William Safire, who called Hillary Clinton "a congenital liar" in 1996, may have earned White House enemy status, but to Emanuel, the columnist was "Uncle Bill," Kurtz writes, and Emanuel "even had Safire over for dinner." Michael Kelly of the New Republic won a lunch date with Emanuel for calling Clinton "a shocking liar," "occasional demagogue," and worse. (Note to White House reporters: For a face-to-face with Emanuel, write the most scathing thing you can about Obama.)

Emanuel games everybody and everything, so the press shouldn't take it personally—and it won't. In fact, as I write, the White House press corps is doing whippits in celebration of his appointment. The Obama campaign famously kept the press at arm's length. Emanuel, on the other hand, can't shut up. (Whose fault do you think it is that the whole world knew for days that Emanuel had been offered the chief of staff job but couldn't make up his mind?)

The Obama campaign provided the press with no internal drama, forcing reporters to intuit the real agenda. Emanuel, on the other hand, is a drama queen; seething, foaming Mamet production; a big mouth; and a calculating mensch who loves nothing more than to stoke the feed bag for press-corps noshers. With Emanuel at the top, the Obama administration might not get the stories it wants, but with the Emanuelian forethought and topspin, it might just avert the stories it dreads.

******

Thanks to the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz for writing a book that I could sieve into a column so efficiently. He's very thoughtful, that Kurtz. And it's a good book. Read any good books about media manipulation lately? Send titles to . (E-mail may be quoted by name in "The Fray," Slate's readers' forum; in a future article; or elsewhere unless the writer stipulates otherwise. Permanent disclosure: Slate is owned by the Washington Post Co.)

Track my errors: This hand-built RSS feed will ring every time Slate runs a "Press Box" correction. For e-mail notification of errors in this specific column, type the word Rahm in the subject head of an e-mail message, and send it to .

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Jack Shafer is Slate's editor at large. Follow him on Twitter.
Photograph of Rahm Emanuel by Lauren Victoria Burke/ABC News via Getty Images.
COMMENTS

Good. I like a chief of staff who does not care about offending the sensibilities of the Washington Press Corp!

--Ltngbolt

(To reply, click here)

Obama had them at hello. He didn't need to lift a finger to get the press on his side. Odds are they'll stay, even if he continues to treat them as highhandedly as he did during the campaign, most visibly shutting off nearly all access to Gaffemaster B (Biden) and to himself as it came down to the wire.

If motormouth Emanuel changes the tone, that will help Obama to extend his honeymoon. However, as chief of staff, he won't have the time to obsess over the press as he has done in his other roles.

Also, it certainly doesn't seem as though the two men are temperamentally suited to work together. Mr. Cool and Mr. Hot? Even more unusually, in politics the even-tempered guy is usually the one behind-the-scenes trying to cool off the passionate front-man. Here it's the reverse. Fun to watch...

--Larry

[Reply to above] I believe you are correct that RE will not have the time to engage in the seemingly low-level noise he was disseminating in the Clinton WH. He now has a "serious" job while engaging others to do the lunches with Cokie et Howie etc. And lets not forget that guru Axelrod will still be around to ensure that everyone is on message. Both ER and Axelrod will probably have Obama's ear... at different times.

--Polmanic

(To join this thread, click here)

(11/10)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
The end of Prohibition.58/091204_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Tiger Woods.37/091204_TC.jpg
Eaking-spay in ode-cay.52/091204_TD.jpg