HOME / well-traveled: Dispatches from the front lines of travel.

Eco-Touring in Honduras

Beware, Shark

Posted Tuesday, June 3, 2008, at 7:14 AM ET

Click here to launch a slide show on day 2 of eco-touring in Honduras.Not so much swimming as hovering, I slipped into the school of sharks. There were 18 of them, some as long as 8 feet. "These are big girls," the dive master had warned us; many were pregnant and thicker than usual. They swam above, below, and around me, so close I could have reached out and touched them. The dive master had advised us not to, a warning that had struck me as bizarre. I mean, really. What idiot would do such a thing?

But now I saw the problem. These Caribbean reef sharks had skin like velvet, dark and rich in the shadows, shiny and pale when it caught the light. They shimmered hypnotically as they moved. I noticed scars, dark healed gashes on their sides and around their jaws, telling stories I couldn't read—of feeding frenzies, mating rituals, and fishermen. I wanted to touch. The sharks, meanwhile, seemed to register me as an uninteresting object. They came disquietingly close but always turned away from me at the last second. As they swerved, I found myself wishing one would shimmy along my body as she did, gliding in tandem with me for a few moments.

The sharks gave me butterflies, but the truth was that I was probably more of a danger to them than they were to me. For one thing, I was with 14 other humans, some of them fatter and slower than me, giving the sharks considerable choice should they choose to nibble. For another, as sharks go, the Caribbean reef shark is not especially threatening. Just four species of the 410 or so known to science account for most shark attacks on humans, and this wasn't one of them.

The sharks, on the other hand, would have had a lot to worry about had they been half as anxiety-prone as humans. Our group was shark baiting, one of the most controversial eco-tourism practices in the Caribbean. Sharks, being wild animals, are difficult to procure on command. So many of the hundreds of shark-dive operators around the world tempt the animals with food. At Waihuka Diving, Roatán's sole shark operation, the dive master took a plastic bucket with holes punctured in the lid and filled it with a small amount of chopped-up fish. The dive master planted the bucket in the sand 20 feet from the coral wall where we kneeled, and the sweet smell of fish guts lured the sharks to school right in front of us. They kept schooling as, at the dive master's signal, we moved into the fray. My excitement was pure, more real and visceral than I had expected. And, fortunately, immune to the presence of other humans and the artificiality of the setup.

Which brings me back to the bait. In 2001, Florida banned shark feeding in its waters, a move hailed by public-safety officials but also by conservationists. Feeding sharks lowers their natural fear of humans, which makes them easier prey for fishermen. And repeatedly luring them to the same spot makes them easy for fishermen to find.

This is a problem, because more than 100 million sharks are killed by humans every year. Several species are critically endangered, and some have gone extinct within specific regions. Sharks are frequently killed as collateral damage—for instance, by tuna boats in the Pacific. (Your dolphin-safe tuna is not necessarily shark-safe.) Sharks are also a direct target of fishermen, especially for their fins, with escalating demand for shark-fin soup in China and Taiwan. The fins are so valuable that fishermen often cut them off and throw the shark back into the ocean, where it bleeds and sinks to its death.

We humans returned to our places in front of the coral wall, and the dive master, wearing a chain-mail gauntlet, ripped the lid off the bucket of chopped fish. The effect was instantaneous. These lazily graceful creatures were suddenly bullets of muscle. In a matter of seconds they became a writhing, food-focused mass. A single thrash by a single shark looked powerful enough to knock me out.

As the melee ended, the sharks dispersed, trolling the area in wider and wider curves until a few disappeared into the blue. The divers reluctantly began to swim up the anchor line. At 15 feet below the surface, I paused and hung onto the line, floating like a windsock in the current while the nitrogen left my body. For a few minutes, I was able to watch the sharks from above, now just gray silhouettes but still recognizable by the S-curve of their swim.

A fisherman on Roatán can get about $40 for one of these sharks, or $720 for 18. Waihuka gets about $80 per diver, so $960 on this 12-customer dive. They can charge $960 for those same sharks again and again, and the sharks don't have to die: The resource is renewable. Assuming similar overhead (a boat, an outboard engine, gasoline), shark-watching is more profitable for the locals than shark-fishing, and it conserves nature rather than decimating it.

Doesn't that make shark diving a good thing? The rosy view of eco-tourism would say we should exploit shark viewing to stop shark fishing. Hire the fishermen as dive masters, and you've got a win-win-win for locals, tourists, and sharks. Shark-watch businesses further argue that the more people have happy encounters with the animal, the more public support there will be for researching and protecting it. (The whale-watching industry plausibly advances a similar argument.)

Unfortunately, ecology is a little more complicated. The day before my dive, I had asked James Foley of Roatán Marine Park what he thought about shark baiting. "If you feed sharks, you're interfering with their natural feeding cycle," he said. Since they're the top predators, that messes with the entire food chain. If they eat less of their usual prey, the prey population balloons and eats more of the creatures below it, and so on and so forth. "It sends shock waves through the whole ecosystem," Foley said. Masses of data and very sophisticated computing are required to get an idea of the ultimate impact, but the point is this: Feed wild beasts with utmost caution, not because of some selfish concern over getting your hand bitten off, but for their sake.

Even knowing what Foley had told me about the food chain, I wanted, post-dive, to side with proponents of shark diving, the ones who say that such cara-a-cara encounters will teach man to love the beast. After I surfaced, and for some time afterward, I would close my eyes and try to re-imagine myself back down to the reef, envisioning their skin and their scars and re-tasting the frisson. Not many experiences in adult life make me want to do that.

Beware, Shark

Posted Tuesday, June 3, 2008, at 7:14 AM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Elisabeth Eaves is the author of Bare and a staff writer at Forbes.com.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

It seems like ecotourism is always the answer whenever a third world country's interest in improving their economy runs into everyone's interest in conservation.

I wonder, though, how big the market for these destinations is, and how many such places it can support. Even assuming that everyone who traveled abroad was a firm believer in low-impact environmentally-friendly hospitality, how many people could afford to travel internationally and stay in the middle of nowhere (which eliminates business travelers, who have to be in or near cities or industrial areas)? How long before these places are simply poaching each others' customers?

--eofiss

(To reply, click here.)

I've been reading the articles about eco-touring in Honduras since Monday, and as an Honduran who loves and lives in his country, I'm sometimes offended by the way the country and its people are portrayed.

Yes, we are an underdeveloped country, most of our population lives in poverty, unexplainable events happen on a regular basis. (right now the capital's city national airport has been shut down for almost a week due to a plane crash.) But I think that the article takes a simplistic view of Honduras, the challenges the country faces, and most importantly our history.

--Roberto Cardona

(To reply, click here.)

I saw much of the Honduran mainland in 1988 while a preventive medicine specialist there. The Copán site was a real highlight out of all of my travels. I also remember a small river which was actually the runoff of a geothermal hot spring and remarkable for its volume of very hot water. My boss called me foolish for even checking but I surprised us both when I discovered that mosquito larvae could still live in the very hot and not perfectly still waters defying what we had been taught about them. I was later disappointed when my request to visit Roatán was denied and I have been wanting to visit ever since.

Recently I viewed the itineraries of every cruise ship with a port call in Roatán and I nearly did book on one. I have only gone on one cruise ever, to Antarctica in 2005, on an eco-tour with Zodiac shore excursions from a luxury 120 passenger ship with PhD biologists for guides and evening lectures on the ecosystems that we visited. We left only our footprints behind and even then we were very careful about where we left those on the rocks and snow fields by only following in our guide's foot steps.

I am glad that I skipped Roatán this year. I would be saddened to be a part of the current degradation of it's environment. More than ever now I wish that I could have seen it 20 years ago while it was still pristine.

--wmccomninel

(To reply, click here.)

(6/5)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
DOONESBURY FLASHBACK
TODAY'S VIDEO
Black Friday.12/TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Thanksgiving.69/091125_TC.jpg
Hedley struts his stuff.52/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg