hot document: Primary sources exposed and explained.

California's Gay Marriage Decision

hot document
entries
12345678
from: Bonnie Goldstein

Posted Friday, May 16, 2008, at 4:08 PM ET

Four years ago, the California Supreme Court decided that same-sex marriage licenses issued at San Francisco's City Hall were "unlawful." Although California has conferred legal benefits to same-sex couples since 1999 through "registered domestic partnerships" (Page 3), in the absence of a judicial determination, "civil marriage" was reserved for opposite-sex couples.

That lapse was remedied by the same high court on May 15*. The justices ruled (excerpts below and on the following eight pages) that neither one's "capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship" nor "the responsibility to care for and raise children" (Page 7) depends upon an individual's sexual orientation. The state constitution guarantees the "right to marry" as integral to "liberty and personal autonomy" (Page 6), and each person has the right to establish an "officially recognized and protected family" and "to have their family relationship accorded dignity and respect" (Page 8).

Send Hot Document ideas to . Please indicate whether you wish to remain anonymous.

Correction, May 19, 2008: This article originally referred to April 15 as the date of the ruling. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

hot document
entries
12345678
from: Bonnie Goldstein

Posted Friday, May 16, 2008, at 4:08 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Bonnie Goldstein is a former special investigator to the U.S. Senate and investigative producer for ABC News.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Let the Oil Deals Flow
Raad Alkadiri | Congress should not interfere in the oil industry's contract negotiations with the Iraqi government.