SalesjerkMeet the next great TV pitchman.
Posted Tuesday, May 13, 2008, at 12:01 PM ET
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponI've made several attempts to get in touch with Vince, hoping to quiz him about the finer points of his delivery. As of this writing, my phone calls have not been returned. But Internet sleuthing suggests (and a Shamwow spokesman confirms) that Vince is a man named Vince Offer. (Key pieces of evidence: the photo attached to this press release, and the fact that Offer once pitched kitchen vegetable choppers at swap meets.)
Offer's history includes lawsuits waged against the Farrelly brothers, Anna Nicole Smith, and the Church of Scientology. He also wrote and directed the 1999 film The Underground Comedy Movie. The New York Post review gave the film zero stars, said it "may be the least amusing comedy ever made," and asked, "How can the War Crimes Tribunal indict Slobodan Milosevic but let Vince Offer still walk the streets?"
Harsh! But hey, Vince is certainly not boring, and therein lies a significant component of his effectiveness. The guy's jerky, aggrieved attitude jumps off the screen—particularly when he berates his own crew, snapping, "You followin' me, camera guy?" Vince manages, in the course of a minute spent swiping counters and dabbing at carpets, to make us wonder, "Whoa, what's the deal with this freak?" That makes the ad an attention-grabber, and it helps the Shamwow stand out from a crowded field of useless doohickeys.
Vince's abrasive manner might also mark a unique, new strategy in the annals of pitchdom. TV salespeople tend to be warmly enthusiastic, not confrontational. Watch the crew of hosts on the Home Shopping Network. Their role is to serve as easily wowed surrogates for the viewer. They'll run their fingers along the jeweled necklines of a knit separates collection, rapturously whispering, "Look. At. That." The constant ruse is that the hosts covet these products for themselves.
Billy Mays—likely the most famous pitchman of the last decade—also traffics in friendly excitement. A black-bearded fellow who shills for OxiClean, Hercules Hooks, Ding King, and other as-seen-on-TV dreck, Mays' celebrity no doubt stems from his signature, high-decibel style. (He locks into his upper vocal register and stays there for minuteslong, breathless monologues. Check out the YouTube clip of Mays doing multiple takes as he seeks the perfect way to yell, "You don't need a cabinet full of cleaners!") But through all the screaming, Mays is always an upbeat pal of the viewer—never a sneering bully.
Can Vince become the next Billy Mays—a ubiquitous, mercenary pitchman hawking products up and down the TV dial? I don't see why not. If anything, the current moment's more suited to Vince's smooth-talking condescension than to Mays' earnest fervor. Jaded consumers expect to get snowed and almost distrust the very pretense of trustworthiness. As my friend who's been tempted by the Shamwow puts it: "What I think I like about Vince is that he is upfront and seemingly comfortable with his schtick. He appears to be saying, 'I am a carnie huckster, you know it and I know it, but that's OK because this product is that good.' "
Grade: B-. It's by no means revolutionary, but the Shamwow ad gets the job done. Just pay no attention to the slew of quick edits going on as that spilled cola miraculously evaporates from that swatch of carpet. Also, ignore the fact that Billy Mays once pitched a near-identical product called Zorbeez using a near-identical set of demos. And, of course, be sure to ascribe no significance to the Shamwow's unfortunate first syllable.
Got an ad you'd like to see reviewed? E-mail your suggestions to .
The Hilarious Results of Slate's "Write Like Sarah Palin" Contest
Does Your iPhone Really Need a Titanium Case?
Vice Presidents Say the Darnedest Things
The Golden Scissors Awards Are the Oscars of Black Hair
Slate's Complete Coverage of the Tiger Woods Scandal
The Awesome Spectacle of Glenn Beck's Live Performance of The Christmas Sweater
Remarks from the Fray:
I had been seeing these ads on television and was wondering why I was so captivated by this thing which is advertised by everyone. This article got at the root of that pretty well; the guy is an asshole.
That said, this guy also does the ad in Spanish. While his Spanish is straight out of a can, it showed a different side of the guy with the headset. It presented him as a somewhat polite salesman. His intense edge blunted by his remedial Spanish. Anyone who reads this comment should look for them, as it is an interesting contrast to the abrasive English version.
If you don't frequent the Spanish channels, watch gol tv as that's where I usually see them along with multitudes of ads for male potency pills.
--acisnoone
(To reply, click here.)
Just go to WalMart and get about a dozen over in the automotive section for about $4.76. WalMart has almost every thing that is "not available in stores". Sometimes a little smaller, a bit less quality. Look for the same product, often, but not always, with a WalMart House brand name.
Sometimes the product may be available at WalMart before the 'only on TV offer'. Makes one wonder if the TV pitch man buys, or in this case, gets the idea from WalMart.
--janeslogin
(To reply, click here.)
I spilled something a few minutes ago, and reached for-- <gasp> a paper towel, which got me to wondering whether Mr Annoying's math was on target. He said that I would be using $20 worth of paper towels a month, implying that I would do better to use Shamwows instead. I wish I could set up a couple of columns here, but I'll leave that to the Fray Wizards to fix next time they go a Fray overhaul. Meantime, we'll have to go vertical for this off the cuff cost benefit analysis...
On the Paper Towel Side: Cost. My paper towels are about $8 for a package of twelve. So I'd have to be using, according to the huckster in question, one roll of paper towels a day. Sorry, Huck-- not even close. Even on Bad Spill Days we don't use an entire roll of paper towels. We don't have enough time in our days to use a roll a day. Maybe if we spent more time making infomercials we would, but no, sorry. We probably go through one to two rolls a week, call it one and a half, for six a month, which is.... $4. Call that $50 a year, a dollar a week just about.
On the Sham (starting to sound aptly named, huh?) side, we have $28 for eight towels. Good, as we have seen, for soaking up spilled water (cola). Frankly, we don't spill water (cola) all that much, but now and then we do! I just did, in fact, spill a little water on the kitchen table, and I mopped it up with a single paper towel, which I threw away. If I had a Sham Towel handy, I could have mopped it up, wrung it out in the sink, and, uh, what, hung it on a cabinet door somewhere to dry. Real, uh, handy..
Here are some things I am not so sure the Sham Towel would be good at mopping up: Tomato Sauce, melted butter, spilled flour, oil spatters on the stove. Here are some things that even if Sham Towels could clean up, I don't see how the Sham Towel itself could be cleaned of: engine oil, automotive coolant, anti-seize compound, epoxy resin, Gorilla Glue, WD-40.
If I used a Sham to wax my car, would I want the washed and cleaned and dried Sham in my kitchen to wipe up something off a surface where I do food prep? Maybe not. And how convenient is it to have to keep track of these Shams and wash and dry them and carry them back to wherever I keep them handy? On top of the $3.50/per Sham cost I have to add them to my laundry stream, so the actual cost is more. Say it costs me only fifty cents/per to keep a Sham Towel clean and ready to absorb every year-- that's $4 per Sham, and I still need paper towels for dealing with french fries and fried dumplings that need draining, wiping out cast iron frying pans, and for the garage and automotive use where I really want the towel and toxic chemicals to just leave and go away for good. (Oh sure, I could "wring out" the engine oil, then take the Sham Towels to the dry cleaners for laundering-- that would certainly be cost effective!)
No, sorry, I just don't think that Shamwows are a substitute for any but a small fraction of my paper towel usage, and that the cost of using Shamwows where they could be substituted in would exceed the cost of using paper towels, and in the bargain would impose a time and bother burden that would make them truly expensive.
--DuckworkerMike
(To reply, click here.)
(5/14)