moneybox
columns
- Selling the Family Jewels
Desperate American banks are selling everything that isn't nailed down (except the private jets).
Daniel Gross
posted July 23, 2008 - Starbucks Obituaries
Slate readers' responses to our call for Starbucks memories.
Chadwick Matlin
posted July 23, 2008 - Save Your Starbucks!
Soon there will be 600 fewer places to get a Frappucino. Slate wants to hear the symptoms of your withdrawal.
Chadwick Matlin
posted July 21, 2008 - Help Wanted
If the federal government can't accurately forecast which jobs will grow, can anyone do it?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - Bair Market
The FDIC chairwoman's great ideas for preventing the meltdown of America's banking industry.
Daniel Gross
posted July 18, 2008 - Search for more moneybox articles
- Subscribe to the moneybox RSS feed
- View our complete moneybox archive
How Bad Could It Get?Will the recession be more like the 1990-'91 downturn or the Great Depression?
By James LedbetterPosted Friday, May 2, 2008, at 5:06 PM ET
And remember: If Feldstein is right, then we've already been through six months of shrinkage, so only another 10 or so to go. Not a reason to cheer—but also not a reason to panic.
Joblessness. The age-old joke says that it's a recession when your neighbor loses her job and a depression when you lose yours. The joke contains a kernel of economic truth: The Great Depression involved massive job losses that affected nearly every American family. At one point during that 43-month ordeal between 1929 and 1933, one in every four working Americans was unemployed. Every significant industry cut jobs, and entire towns and regions—at least in economic terms—were wiped off the map.
It's never been that bad since. In the 1981-'82 downturn, the unemployment rate hit nearly 11 percent, but the postwar norm has been single digits. (The April rate is 5 percent, down from 5.1 percent in March.) True, unemployment is generally considered a "lagging indicator," meaning that if we're in a recession now, we may not yet have seen the worst of job losses. Moreover, critics say that the official definition of unemployed would be larger if it included people who work part-time but can't find full-time work, the substantial U.S. prison population, and so on.
But no one would dispute that the American economy is more dynamic and resilient than it was in the '30s. The overwhelming majority of workers in those days toiled in either manufacturing or agriculture, sectors that are especially vulnerable to bust cycles. The employment market has diversified, workers have better skills, and global trade is much more important. So, if this recession leads to increases in unemployment—as it almost certainly will—not all job sectors will be uniformly hit. (Even in the severe '81-'82 recession, only 72 percent of U.S. industries experienced declining employment, compared with 100 percent during the Depression.) Wages may well flatten or shrink—as they've been doing for years—but it's difficult to find a credible scenario in which U.S. unemployment is going to hit 10 percent in the next 18 months.
Depth. The recession between 1973 and 1975 was punishing. Then as now, rising fuel costs led to inflation (more than 12 percent in 1974). An unprecedented wage and price freeze imposed by the Nixon administration did not stem the problem. Gasoline was rationed, and unemployment rose as high as 9 percent.
Yet for all that, the actual drop in gross national product, according to research by late economic historian Geoffrey Moore, was just under 5 percent. By that measure, '73-'75 was the worst recession since the Depression. The inflation-adjusted gross domestic product (as it is now called) has shrunk only in two brief periods since—in the early '80s and the early '90s, in both cases by less than 3 percent.
So, let's say this recession gets as bad as the one in '73-'75. The 2007 gross domestic product in current dollars is more than $13.8 trillion. A 5 percent hit this year would take the economy to $13.1 trillion, or a little less than what it was in 2005. Based on growth patterns that have been quite steady since 1939, we'd be back at $13.8 trillion by 2009. Undesirable, but not catastrophic.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:27 -0400- Queen Elizabeth II Announces She's Pregnant Again
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:00:00 -0400 - Ebert and Roeper Leaving 'Ebert and Roeper'
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:00:21 -0400 - » More from the Onion
A Grand TourDavid Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon
- David Ignatius: Middle East Peace for Dummies
- Robert Novak: Scandal at the Pentagon
- Dana Milbank: Sorry We Asked, Sorry You Told
- Jamie Barnett: Defending Our Values
- Today's Headlines
- Can Mugabe Survive Zimbabwe’s New Political Order?
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:31:17 GMT - How the Pine Beetle is Destroying Colorado Forests
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:20:17 GMT - Obama in the Middle East: No Easy Questions
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:15:44 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- When Thugs Cry
Wed, 16 July 2008 18:25:58 GMT - Black in America, Now What?
Tue, 22 July 2008 14:45:43 GMT - Gen Y and the Colorblind Lie
Tue, 8 July 2008 18:14:03 GMT - » More from The Root

moneybox









