culturebox
columns
- Lawn Pox
Children's play equipment and the decline of the American yard.
Tom Vanderbilt
posted May 2, 2008 - iHero
Why Iron Man is like Steve Jobs.
Grady Hendrix
posted May 1, 2008 - The Sweet Smell of Success
The mysterious art of writing about perfume.
Jim Lewis
posted April 30, 2008 - Mickey Mouse Operation
Forget Miley Cyrus. Check out Disney's Chinese underwear ad.
Daniel Brook
posted April 29, 2008 - The Music Industry's Extortion Scheme
The record labels want you to pay a tax on music. It's not as horrible as it sounds.
Reihan Salam
posted April 25, 2008 - Search for more culturebox articles
- Subscribe to the culturebox RSS feed
- View our complete culturebox archive
Believe It or NotMemoir fabulists getting caught means the system is working.
By Ben YagodaPosted Thursday, March 6, 2008, at 5:29 PM ET
Click here for guidelines on how to fake your next memoir, here to learn about the feud over a former child-soldier's autobiography, here to hear about the next faked-memoir scandal before anybody else does, and here to get a sneak peek at Volume 2 of Margaret B. Jones' memoirs.

In 1837, the American Anti-Slavery Society published the life story of a fugitive slave who went by the name of James Williams. The book, narrated in Williams' first-person voice, told of his harsh treatment on an Alabama plantation and the torture he had seen inflicted on his fellow slaves. The veracity of the book was almost immediately challenged by an Alabama newspaper editor, who called it "a notorious libel upon our country" and printed a letter claiming that Williams was in fact Shadrach Wilkins, a fugitive not only from slavery but from charges of attempted murder. The Anti-Slavery Society initially denied the charges, but the accusation didn't go away, and the society directed two of its members to investigate. These men reluctantly concluded that "many of the Statements made in the said Narrative were false." Weeks later, the society discontinued sales of the book. James Williams/Shadrach Wilkins, meanwhile, was nowhere to be found.
So the fake memoir—currently in the news with the daily-double outing of Love and Consequences and Misha: A Mémoire of the Holocaust Years—is by no means a phenomenon that originated with James Frey. In fact, the history of autobiography is full of them. A 1937 book called Sisters of the Road was supposedly the memoirs of Boxcar Bertha Thompson, a female hobo; years later, the real author was revealed to be Ben Reitman, a Chicago physician and reformer. The Education of Little Tree, the autobiography of a Cherokee boy growing up in the 1930s, was published in 1976 and became a young-adult classic. Actual author: Asa Carter, a white Alabaman who had once been a Ku Klux Klan member and a speechwriter for George Wallace. So many holes have been found in Lillian Hellman's autobiographical trilogy of An Unfinished Woman, Pentimento, and Scoundrel Time that the books couldn't keep you dry on a drizzly day.
But is it such a terrible thing that so many lying memoirists have been exposed? On the contrary: It's evidence that the system works. (Full disclosure: I am writing a book on memoir for Riverhead Books, the publisher of Love and Consequences.) Consider the case of James Williams' tale of his life as a slave. The discovery that it was a fraud chastened the abolitionists who had been behind the book. They continued to seek out and publish slave narratives, but post-Williams, knowing that their very cause was at stake, they put a finer point on the truthfulness of the tales they were distributing. They began sending their authors on the lecture circuit to answer questions from all corners and, equally important, to show that they existed, scars and all. Scores of slave narratives—including The Autobiography of Frederic Douglass, a classic of American literature—were published after the Williams affair, and it's universally acknowledged that these memoirs were an important factor in the abolition of slavery.
And this is pretty much how things have happened since then: The perpetrators have eventually been found out. Or, to be more precise, the more brazen or audacious the lie, the greater the likelihood of exposure.
In the wake of the Frey and now the Jones scandals, there's been hand-wringing about the need for fact-checking—or lie-detector tests or something!—at publishing houses. But you're never going to stop people from making stuff up. It is a fact of human nature that a substantial number of people have the capacity and inclination to lie. Some of them are pathological and lie because they are compelled to or just for the fun of it. But generally people lie only when a) they sense that people will believe them, and b) they will be rewarded (with respect, attention, career advancement, money, pity, or something else they covet).
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Michel Gondry Entertained For Days By New Cardboard Box
Sat, 10 May 2008 01:00:52 -0400 - [audio] India's Top Physicists Develop Plan To Get The Hell Out Of India
Sat, 10 May 2008 01:00:39 -0400 - [audio] Cheney Adds Rare '64 Kuwait To Oil Cellar
Fri, 09 May 2008 01:00:54 -0400 - » More from the Onion
- Today's Opinions
- New Allies In Asia?
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - The Price of Delay
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - Keeping New Mothers Alive
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - » More from washingtonpost.com
- Today's Headlines
- McCain's Convention Chair Worked for Burma's Military Junta
Sat, 10 May 2008 15:27:13 GMT - Baby Names: Does Popularity Affect Choice?
Sat, 10 May 2008 00:14:43 GMT - It’s Fiction—For Real
Fri, 09 May 2008 23:14:05 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Grounded: Conversations on The Root
Wed, 7 May 2008 18:55:35 GMT - Viva Vogue Italia!
Thu, 8 May 2008 18:17:41 GMT - Jazz: On the Cusp of a New Golden Age
Thu, 8 May 2008 15:36:33 GMT - » More from The Root

culturebox









