Slate's Bizbox




human nature: Science, technology, and life.

Rocket BoosterClemens, Pettitte, and "performance-enhancing" drugs.


(Continued from page 1)

Don't get me wrong. You'd be a fool to mess with HGH. The benefits aren't worth the risks. But the notion that Pettitte harmed himself by taking it for three days over two years is ridiculous. And even if he'd taken it every day, it would have done nothing for his pitching.

Is B-12 more natural than HGH? Hardly. Your body produces HGH but not B-12. Vitamins seem natural because they're the kind of thing your mom tells you to take. That's why Clemens, in his case for the wholesome goodness of taking B-12 shots in the buttocks, invoked his mother's advice. But the reason your mom told you to take vitamins is that they're foreign. As Dr. Susan Shurin of NIH explained to the committee, "A vitamin is a chemical substance that is required for a particular chemical reaction to occur in the body, but is not synthesized by the body, and therefore needs to be included in the diet."

That brings us to the question of intent. Was Pettitte's stated motive for taking HGH worse than Clemens' stated motive for taking B-12? In his Feb. 4 deposition, Pettitte testified that he had resorted to HGH after an elbow injury disabled him in 2002. He had felt obliged to "do whatever I could to try to get back on the field and try to earn my money." Why HGH? "I just thought that that it could help me, you know, heal up quicker," Pettitte said. Athletes often lie about their reasons for doping. But by all accounts, and by the evidence of his conduct since baseball's report on doping came out, Pettitte has been particularly honest. And you don't have to take his word for it. The trainer who injected both pitchers has corroborated Pettitte's story.



Why did Clemens get B-12 shots? "I think it's beneficial," he told the committee. "It was most common if anybody was sick on the team or if your energy felt run down." The former chief doctor for Clemens' old team said Clemens came to him for a B-12 booster because "he was feeling fatigued." A fellow player, C.J. Nitkowski, recalled hearing about B-12 from Clemens when players were saying it was "great for your immune system and great for giving you energy."

Let's tally the score. Pettitte took HGH while on the disabled list. Clemens took B-12 while healthy. Pettitte took HGH to heal an injury. Clemens took B-12 to avoid sickness and restore energy. It's hard to see how Clemens' motives were more therapy-oriented, as opposed to enhancement-oriented, than Pettitte's were. Neither drug made a difference. Neither drug enhances performance. Taking vitamins is normal and risk-free, but taking them in your ass is not. The chief difference between HGH and B-12 is that HGH is legally restricted because, in excessive doses, it can be harmful. But it's hard to imagine anyone better positioned to avoid that harm than a professional athlete under elite medical supervision. Furthermore, if baseball regulated drugs according to harm, you wouldn't see players and managers chewing tobacco in the World Series.

Why is Pettitte, unlike Clemens, apologizing? Because Clemens, unlike Pettitte, has chosen to lie. And because what Pettitte did—unlike what Clemens admitted to doing—somehow counts as cheating. The first difference is already under investigation. The second deserves no less.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
William Saletan is Slate's national correspondent and author of Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War.
Photographs of: Roger Clemens by Mark Wilson/Getty Images; Andy Pettitte by Robert Browman/Getty Images.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES




Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Over the Line
Harold Ford Jr. | I know what it's like to be smeared by your opponent.
: The Positive in Negative Ads
PLUS » Milbank: The President's Lullaby