Slate's Bizbox
television: What you're watching.

Karl Rove, News AnalystHe offers clarity, concision, humility, good humor, good posture …

By Troy Patterson
Posted Friday, Feb. 15, 2008, at 5:02 PM ET
Karl Rove. Click image to expand.

Liberals would seem to believe that Bush strategist Karl Rove is a monster genetically engineered from the DNA material recovered from a fair copy of Il Principe, Pat Nixon's cloth coat, and one of Lee Atwater's old guitar picks, while moderates regard him with a vague but considerable sense of respectful queasiness. I will not pretend to understand what our friends on the Right think of the man, but the president of the United States calls him "Boy Genius," and those nicknames have got to count for something. All concerned parties must be a bit unnerved by Rove's recent performance as a contributor to Fox News.

Since materializing on-air on Super Tuesday, Rove has merely offered clarity, concision, humility, good humor, good posture, and dispassionate analysis. To be sure, there are lefties distraught that he does not eat babies on-air. Maybe some conservatives, too. But the only thing more impressive than hearing the man drop political science—what other cable-news analyst has lately name-checked Henry Cabot Lodge?—is seeing that one of our culture's most controversial figures is one of its most mild-mannered. Given the jaunty clattering of MSNBC's 24/7 locker room, the rapid-fire banter of CNN's endless phalanxes of conventional wiseguys, and the screeching maelstrom summoned nightly by Rove's Fox colleagues, the guy plays like a human comma, a very welcome thoughtful pause.

Unlike most other campaign managers who've made their way to the analysis desk, Rove is not in possession of a shtick. No full-throated James Carville gumbo for him. None of the hissing superiority of Dick Morris, who eagerly embraces the role of a blow-dried weasel. Rove leaves only an impression of relaxed competence and happily resigned nerdiness. On The O'Reilly Factor last Monday, Rove's stiffness either unsettled the host or triggered his bullying instinct. ("Are you ready for this?" Bill blared. "You look a little, you know. Just relax now!") The new kid, beyond the occasional smirk or mouth-breathing giggle fit, makes little effort to project personality. It thus falls to Fox News to massage his image for him.

The other night, Rove appeared, by satellite, on Hannity and Colmes, whose producers lit the Boy Genius as if attempting to establish an aura of creepiness. The shadows of venetian blinds wavered on the wall behind him; his chin cast a shadow on his second chin; you could imagine that he was doing the segment from an office he'd just broken into. The noir mood was only shattered when, in an endearingly assistant-managerial touch, he produced a white board and began doing some delegate math.

True, the white board was derivative of Tim Russert's old Electoral College math prop from 2000. (Rove to Hannity: "Hey, I was doing white boards when that boy was still shoveling sidewalks in Buffalo!") But there was something appealing about its homeyness and homeliness, especially in an era when CNN's election-night returns coverage features a wall-sized map combining a Telestrator, an interactive Smithsonian display, and HAL 9000. And, after years of hearing about Rove as an ogre or mastermind or dark architect, it's a pleasure to see him looking like Dilbert.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Troy Patterson is Slate's television critic.
Screen shot of Karl Rove on Fox News courtesy YouTube.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Comments from the Fray

Karl Rove is a genius. His genius was applied to politics in a way that distressed, well, liberals and moderates, and all of the candidates whose careers were destroyed by the application of that genius. People that we like or don't like are not made smarter or dumber by our opinion of them…

I think some talent is needed as well as an ability to be ruthless. Too many wannabe's out there have the ruthlessness and the sarcasm but little or no talent.

--Tonto Goldberg

(To reply, click here)

I think the jury is still out on Rove's alleged genius. He did pull a pretty impressive rabbit out of his hat by engineering the election of a president only marginally smarter than a box of dirt. But if you recall, his longer-term strategic goal was to establish a "durable Republican majority"; we'll see what happens in November (if Hillary's nominated, that might just energize enough Republicans to make it competitive), but he might end up achieving just the opposite. His strategy of winning by ginning up turnout of the far-right base was one part of a larger pattern of overreach that might just have turned the Democrats into a semblance of a functional party united against a common enemy.

--Sawbones

(To reply, click here)

(2/18)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
A Grand Tour
David Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon